Laserfiche WebLink
COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. C- 5.3583 <br />EXHIBIT B <br />approval and CITY concurrence. CITY or AUTHORITY signature on individual sheets or specifications <br />is not required. <br />6.1.5 Design Reviews <br />The Plans and Specification design package(s) will entail a formal review package including <br />30 percent, 60 percent, 90 percent, and Ready to Bid. Each shall be scheduled in advance with _at_ <br />least a three -week notice provided for each submittal. The total review time shall be thirty (30) days <br />for each formal review package submittal. The thirty (30) day period begins when the City receives <br />the submittals. If multiple formal review packages are prepared the separate packages will not be <br />concurrently reviewed. In situations where the AUTHORITY intends to submit review packages <br />outside of the formal review packages, the CITY and the AUTHORITY will determine the review times <br />on a case by case basis. The AUTHORITY shall provide the number of copies of the Plans and <br />Specifications for review as requested by the CITY. The CITY shall provide written comments on <br />hard -copy prints, e -file comments, or tabular comments with clear reference to where the comment <br />applies in the review set. Comments must be clear, concise, and legible. Prior to submission to the <br />AUTHORITY, the CITY shall resolve any conflicting comments. <br />The MSF and TPSS site plan design packages shall be reviewed following the CITY's Site <br />Plan Review process and shall be no more than a sixty (60)- -day review. The MSF and TPSS <br />construction document packages shall be reviewed following the CITY's building permit review <br />process and shall be no more than a sixty (60) day review. The sixty (60) day period begins when the <br />City receives the complete package of Plans and Specifications for each submittal. OCTA and the <br />CITY shall endeavor to shorten review durations where possible. <br />The AUTHORITY shall hold comment resolution meetings for each formal review stage and <br />discipline, and shall discuss rejected comments with each reviewer. It is the AUTHORITY's <br />responsibility to evaluate conflicting review comments between the various stakeholders (utility <br />companies, agencies, etc.) and work with the reviewers to develop a final disposition. <br />Exhibit B <br />Page 14 <br />25F -32 <br />