My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75D - PH - MATER DEI EXPANSION AND PARKING STRUCTURE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
03/15/2016
>
75D - PH - MATER DEI EXPANSION AND PARKING STRUCTURE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 10:21:29 AM
Creation date
3/15/2016 10:14:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75D
Date
3/15/2016
Destruction Year
2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EIR No. 2013 -91 and Amend DA No, 1999 -01 <br />July 13, 2015 <br />Page 3 <br />General Plan and Zoning Analysis <br />The General Plan land use designation for the site is Institutional, which allows both government <br />and educational uses such as Mater Del High School. The proposed project is consistent with this <br />General Plan land use designation. A general plan amendment will be required for the 19 parcels <br />and street right -of -way that will be used for the parking structure once they are under the control of <br />the school. <br />The subject site is located in the Open Space (0) zoning district. The O zoning designation allows <br />uses such as educational facilities like Mater Del High School, As a result, the project site is <br />consistent with the zoning designation. An amendment application (zone change) to change the <br />zoning designation of the residential parcels to the Open Space (0) designation will be needed <br />once the additional 19 parcels are acquired. <br />Project Analysis <br />Mater Dei is proposing to expand upon the operations of the existing school campus by <br />constructing a three level, 990 -space parking structure on 19 parcels of land and street segments <br />not currently owned by the school. Additionally, the school is proposing to demolish two older <br />classroom buildings and construct a new two -story classroom building in the central section of the <br />campus, Given the urban nature of the site, and the lack of available land surrounding the school, <br />the applicant is proposing to expand into the adjacent single - family residential neighborhood. The <br />following subsections of this staff report provide analyses for each of the recommended action <br />items. <br />Environmental Impact Report <br />The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation and approval of an <br />environmental impact report (EIR) for this project. The environmental issues analyzed in the EIR <br />include aesthetics /light and glare, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, housing, land use and <br />relevant planning, noise, and traffic and circulation. Preparation of the EIR was originally initiated <br />in late 2012 for the project. However, as a result of the economic downturn, minimal work was <br />done on the EIR due to concerns with the ability to finance the project. During this time, the <br />applicant was able to commence the purchase of some of the homes in the expansion area of the <br />project. The applicant is now ready to move forward with the project, which includes the <br />certification of the environmental impact report. <br />In accordance with CEQA, the Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the project was circulated for a 30- <br />day public review period on November 13, 2012. Further, a public scoping meeting was held on <br />December 4, 2012 to receive comments on the NOP and project. The draft EIR was circulated for <br />review and comment to public, local, regional and state agencies, and interested parties on October <br />0, 2014 for a 45 -day review period, On October 27, 2014, a public hearing was held on the <br />document to obtain input from interested members of the public. By the close of the 45 -day review <br />period, a total of five comments, three written comment letters and two oral comments, were <br />received on the document. <br />75D -5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.