My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-019 - California Environmental Quality Act
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2016
>
2016-019 - California Environmental Quality Act
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2016 10:41:28 AM
Creation date
3/22/2016 11:51:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2016-019
Date
3/15/2016
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mater Dei High School <br />_ •, c i Parking Structure and School Expansion Project <br />�.. Environmental Impact Report <br />Findings <br />1. The,fndiags of the proposed project set jbrth hi this document and the overriding social, economic, and other <br />issues set forth in the Statement o f Overriding Con tideralions provide sitpport for the proposed project and the <br />elimination of this alternative finny fiather consderation. <br />Facts in Support ofFlndings <br />The No Project /No Development Alternative is considered environmentally superior to the <br />proposed project in regards to land use, aesthetics, air quality, GHGs, noise, housing, and traffic and <br />circulation. This Alternative would eliminate the significant and unavoidable impact related to <br />aesthetics that was identified under the proposed project. However, the No Project /No <br />Development Alternative would not accomplish any of the project objectives as listed above in <br />Section 1.2. This Alternative would not provide any on- campus parking in order to accommodate <br />the projected parking demand under the Master Plan for Nlator Dei Ftigh School (Objective 1). <br />Objective 2 would not be accomplished as the No Project /No Development Alternative would not <br />serve the projected growth and potential increase maximum student enrollment from 2,200 students <br />to 2,500 students. Lastly, this Alternative would not provide improvements both on -site (screening <br />walls, landscaping improvements, enhanced architectural treatments) and off -site (transportation <br />improvements) (Objective 3). <br />"REDUCED HEIGHT" ALTERNATIVE <br />The Reduced Height Alternative would involve a reduction in the height of the proposed parldng <br />structure from three-levels to two - levels. This Alternative would develop an approximately 22 -foot <br />parking structure, which would result in a reduction of 316 parking spaces compared to the <br />proposed project (assuming that 686 spaces would be provided, based on the Ground Ploar and <br />Buil&ng Section and Area Surrtnrary, prepared by The Austin Company March 21, 2012]). The parking <br />structure footprint would remain similar to that proposed by the project. New landscaping and <br />architectural treatments would be requited per the City's regulations, This Alternative would also <br />construct a new classroom building and roadway /intersection infrastructure improvements sin filar <br />to the proposed project. <br />Findings <br />The fzndiagt of #fie proposed pr ject set forth in this document and the overriding social., ecanornu, and other <br />issues sat forth in the Statement of Overriding Cotuieleratims provide •support for the proposed project and the <br />elimination of this alternative front further consideration. <br />Facts in Support of Findings <br />The Reduced Height Alternative would accomplish the intent of the project's objectives, but not to <br />the extent of the project, as listed witMn Section 1.2, above. The Reduced Height Alternative would <br />achieve Objectives 1 and .3. However, Objective 2 would not be accomplished as the reduction of <br />316 parldng spaces would not serve the potential increase of the student enrollment from 2,200 <br />students to 2,500 students as a result of buddout of the Master Plan of Mater Dei High School. <br />Statement of Facts and Findings 29 June 2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.