My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3 - PUBLIC HEARING ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
Housing Authority (1999 - Present)
>
2016
>
03/15/2016
>
3 - PUBLIC HEARING ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2016 3:03:55 PM
Creation date
3/22/2016 2:55:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
448
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Administrative Plan 4/1/2016 Page 12-9 <br />12-II.D. CRITERIA FOR DECIDING TO TERMINATE ASSISTANCE <br />Evidence <br />For criminal activity, HUD permits SAHA to terminate assistance if a preponderance of the <br />evidence indicates that a household member has engaged in the activity, regardless of whether <br />the household member has been arrested or convicted [24 CFR 982.553(c)]. <br />SAHA Policy <br />SAHA will use the concept of the preponderance of the evidence as the standard for <br />making all termination decisions. <br />Preponderance of the evidence is defined as evidence which is of greater weight or more <br />convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to it; that is, evidence which <br />as a whole shows that the fact sought to be proved is more probable than not. <br />Preponderance of the evidence may not be determined by the number of witnesses, but by <br />the greater weight of all evidence <br />Consideration of Circumstances [24 CFR 982.552(c)(2)(i)] <br />SAHA is permitted, but not required, to consider all relevant circumstances when determining <br />whether a family’s assistance should be terminated. <br />SAHA Policy <br />SAHA will consider the following factors when making its decision to terminate <br />assistance: <br />The seriousness of the case, especially with respect to how it would affect other <br />residents <br />The effects that termination of assistance may have on other members of the <br />family who were not involved in the action or failure <br />The extent of participation or culpability of individual family members, including <br />whether the culpable family member is a minor or a person with disabilities or (as <br />discussed further in section 12-II.E) a victim of domestic violence dating <br />violence, or stalking <br />The length of time since the violation occurred, the family’s recent history and the <br />likelihood of favorable conduct in the future <br />In the case of drug or alcohol abuse, whether the culpable household member is <br />participating in or has successfully completed a supervised drug or alcohol <br />rehabilitation program or has otherwise been rehabilitated successfully. SAHA <br />will require the participant to submit evidence of the household member’s current <br />participation in or successful completion of a supervised drug or alcohol <br />rehabilitation program, or evidence of otherwise having been rehabilitated <br />successfully. <br />In the case of program abuse, the dollar amount of the overpaid assistance and <br />whether or not a false certification was signed by the family. <br /> <br />3-285
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.