My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25I - AGMT - DEVELOP GIS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
04/05/2016
>
25I - AGMT - DEVELOP GIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2016 4:15:56 PM
Creation date
3/31/2016 3:14:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25I
Date
4/5/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(9) <br />CITY OF SANTA ANA <br />REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS <br />FOR <br />ASSET MANAGEMENT NEEDS ASSESSMENT & IMPLEMENTATION PLAN <br />RFP NO.: 16 -013 <br />I. INTRODUCTION / DESCRIPTION OF WORK <br />Nature of Work: <br />The City of Santa Ana is seeking a consultant to develop an asset management needs assessment and <br />implementation plan. A detailed Scope of Work is included in the Appendix of this RFP as <br />Attachment 1. <br />Number of Proposals and Signature: <br />Four (4) hard copies and one (1) digital file on labeled USB Flash Drive (or equivalent) of your <br />proposal shall be signed by a company official with the power to bind the company and submitted to <br />the City of Santa Ana. One (1) copy of your Fee Proposal shall be submitted. <br />Proposal Evaluation and Rating: <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into consideration: <br />• Firm/Team Experience <br />25% <br />• Understanding of Need <br />25% <br />• Relevant Project Experience <br />20% <br />• Schedule <br />15% <br />• References <br />15% <br />The City has established a proposal review committee to evaluate proposers based on the response to <br />the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the City evaluation criteria <br />set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each submitted proposal and used to rank the <br />proposers. <br />II. PROPOSAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS <br />By submitting a Proposal, the Proposer acknowledges that it has thoroughly examined and accepts <br />the Terms and Conditions of this RFP as described below: <br />A. EXAMINATION: Proposer represent that it has thoroughly examined and become familiar with <br />the services and responsibilities required this RFP and that it is capable of effectively and <br />efficiently performing quality work to achieve the City's objectives. Any attachments referenced <br />herein or any interpretations, clarifications or amendments subsequently posted in the relation to <br />this RFP are fully incorporated. <br />B. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT: The City and the selected Proposer will enter into an <br />Agreement similar to that as shown in Attachment 2, in the Appendix of this RFP. If a Proposer <br />is unwilling or unable to execute an Agreement within thirty (30) days after being notified of <br />selection under this RFP, the City reserves the right to select the next most qualified Proposer or <br />call for new Proposals, whichever the City deems most appropriate. <br />City of Santa Ana RFP 16 -013 <br />25i93`b <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.