Laserfiche WebLink
(Element 3) could be modified, including pumping for a shorter duration, or if necessary <br />shutting down the pumps at certain times to provide low flows that the USFWS and the <br />SARWQCB find agreeable for discharge into the Upper Newport Bay. <br />2. Comment: Project implementation could result in increased erosion in the earthen <br />downstream sections of the channel. The project would remove sediment from dry <br />weather flows along the earthen section of the channel from Mesa Street to Upper <br />Newport Bay. The lack of sediment deposition could encourage greater scouring during <br />wet weather flows. Board recommends conducting a hydraulic study of the channel <br />examining sediment transport prior to determining whether to construct the project. <br />Response: OCFCD is currently aware of erosion issues along the earthen section of the <br />channel from Mesa Street to Upper Newport Bay and is currently developing a channel <br />restoration project to address these issues. <br />Erosion issues result from upstream portions of the channel that are fully hardened in a fully <br />urbanized watershed with comparatively minor sediment loading from the Delhi Watershed <br />to Newport Bay Watershed (Shibberu, 2009). It is estimated that of the 74.7 tons of combined <br />material removed annually from Santa Ana Delhi sub - watershed based on period 2012 -2014 <br />( OCFCD), 33.3% consisted of sediment which amounts to 24.6 tons of sediment. It is <br />possible that 24.6 tons of sediment may be fully retained by the proposed diversion structure <br />and removed by maintenance operations. This retained 24.6 tons of sediment constitutes 0.04% <br />of the overall TMDL limit of 62,500 ton per annum for the Newport Bay Watershed <br />(Shibberu, 2009) and would not require a hydraulic study of the channel examining sediment <br />transport. <br />During wet weather, water is not capable of pooling several feet deep behind the diversion <br />structure before it is released downstream. Flows less than 20 efs will be diverted through an <br />off - channel diversion facility for screening treatment and returned to channel via a Bypass <br />Culvert. Flows exceeding 20 cfs, but less than that of a 2 -year water surface will pass through <br />both the off - channel diversion facility trash nets, and main channel. Only the top 18 inches of <br />flows are to be skimmed for floating litter and debris by a floating boom that rises to match <br />the 2 -year water surface. The boom will partially release after a 2 -year water surface has been <br />reached to maintain the 100 -year flood control capacity of the channel provided by both the <br />off - channel diversion facility and the main channel at the proposed project site. At no point <br />are flows fully contained by the facility, only 3 cfs of dry- weather flows may be pumped <br />from the Bypass Culvert if not returned to channel. <br />2.3 COMMENTS FROM ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT (OCWD) — FEBRUARY 25, 2016 <br />1. Comment: OCWD operates a non - potable recycled water supply system called the <br />Green Acres Project that delivers recycled water to irrigation and industrial users. A <br />portion of the Green Acres Project pipeline is located in the vicinity of the proposed <br />Santa Ana Delhi Channel Diversion Project area. OCWD requests that the applicant <br />consider potential impacts to this pipeline as the project is designed and constructed. <br />Response: Comment noted. Project design plans include provisions for maintaining clearance <br />of the Green Acres Project pipeline. <br />20B -15 <br />