Laserfiche WebLink
2.4 COMMENTS FROM JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT (JWA) - FEBRUARY 25, 2016 <br />1. Comment: Homes border the golf course that could be impacted by excessive odors as <br />well as people who play golf along the channel. The MND should include a clear <br />description of how odor issue will be mitigated or eliminated. <br />Response: IS/MND Section 4.3.1.e (page 4-15) addresses potential odor impacts of the <br />project. The section states that the screening of trash may result in the build-up of trash which <br />may be a source of odors. Removal of accumulated trash within the channel is expected to be <br />on a 30-day maintenance cycle, after each rain event, or as required. If collected trash <br />presents a source of odors, the atypical source of trash would be removed or the frequency of <br />cleaning would be increased to eliminate the source of odors. <br />2. Comment: JWA appreciates that project maintenance language provided in the MND <br />allows for more frequent clean -out of the diversion facility as needed. <br />Response: Comment noted. <br />3. Comment: JWA requests that the HIND discuss whether any trees will be impacted by <br />the project and recommends that the trees be saved if possible, or that other trees be <br />replanted. <br />Response: Existing non-native trees along the fence line of the golf course will be removed to <br />accommodate the relocated access road. Replacement of trees, if desired, can be addressed in <br />the MOU being prepared by the Project Stakeholders. <br />4. Comment: In several MND sections, there is reference to "County of Orange Airport <br />Land Use Commission." This should be changed to "County of Orange/John Wayne <br />Airport", since County of Orange/John Wayne is the property owner with authority to <br />grant easements for the project, not the Commission. <br />Response: Comment noted. <br />2.5 COMMENTS FROM DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) -FEBRUARY 23, <br />2016 <br />1. Comment: Caltrans requests that the applicant submit Environmental Review <br />Documents to the Local Development/Intergovernmental Review Branch prior to <br />request for permit. <br />Response: On January 26, 2016, URS submitted a hard copy of the IS/MND to Caltrans <br />District 12 in advance of the Encroachment Permit application. Staff in Caltrans District 12 <br />Environmental Unit received this copy of the IS/MND as well as relevant portions of the <br />Project plans for review (e-mail exchange with Ed Dolan, Caltrans Environmental Unit, <br />02/20/16). Also, the SCH sent the IS/MND to Caltrans District 12 for environmental review <br />as part of the IS/MND 30-day circulation period. <br />2. Comment: The City of Santa Ana must obtain a fee exempt Encroachment Permit prior <br />to commencement of work within the State Right of Way. Also, the City's contractor <br />will also have to apply for a Double Permit to perform the work. <br />20B'°16 <br />