My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25C - AGMT - OCWD CENTENNIAL PARK
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
06/21/2016
>
25C - AGMT - OCWD CENTENNIAL PARK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2016 9:59:52 AM
Creation date
6/16/2016 3:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Parks, Recreation, & Community Services
Item #
25C
Date
6/21/2016
Destruction Year
2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
406
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 5 <br />acceptable level of risk. Compliance with the California Building Code would <br />reduce potential liquefaction impacts to a less than significant level. <br />Alternative 3: Reduced Intensity Alternative <br />Under Alternative 3, one less injection well would be constructed. There would be <br />fewer components of the project that could be susceptible to liquefaction impacts. <br />The components of the project Would be designed to meet comply with the <br />California Building Code. Compliance with the California Building Code would <br />reduce potential liquefaction impacts to a less than significant level. <br />Alternative 4.- Pipeline Design Alternative <br />Under Alternative 4, potential seismic shaking impacts and risks would be similar <br />to the Proposed Project. The components of the project would be designed to <br />meet comply with the California Building Code. Compliance with the California <br />Building Code would reduce potential liquefaction impacts to a less than <br />significant level. <br />Mitigation Measures <br />No mitigation measures are required. <br />Level of Impact <br />Alternative 1: No adverse impact <br />Alternative 2: Less than significant adverse impact <br />Alternative 3: Less than significant adverse impact <br />Alternative 4: Less than significant adverse impact <br />IMPACT GEO-,3: Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the <br />loss of topsoil? <br />Alternative 1: No Federal Action/No Project <br />Under Alternative 1, the project would not be implemented. There would be no <br />earthwork activities that would expose soils and increase the potential for erosion <br />impacts. <br />Alternative 2: Proposed Project <br />The implementation of the Proposed Project would involve the grading and <br />excavation of approximately 1.25 acres of area. The exposed soils on the project <br />site could be subject to erosion impacts caused by water and wind. Additionally, <br />construction equipment and vehicles could transport sediment to offsite locations. <br />Construction projects which disturb one or more acres of soil are required to <br />obtain coverage under a General Construction Permit by the State Water <br />Resources Control Board. The General Construction Permit requires the filing of <br />Mid Basin Centennial Park 9j§c91A7,Project Final E I R 5-86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.