Laserfiche WebLink
ALVARADOSMITH <br />March 15, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />person is entitled to payment for actual moving and related <br />expenses as the public entity determines to be reasonable and <br />necessary..." <br />The definition of displaced person is found in Government Code §7260(c)(1): <br />"'Displaced person' means both of the following: <br />(A) Any person who moves from real property, or who moves his <br />or her personal property from real property, either: <br />(i) As a direct result of a written notice of intent to acquire, or the acquisition of, <br />the real property, in whole or in part, for a program or project undertaken by a public entity or by <br />any person having an agreement with, or acting on behalf of, a public entity. <br />Mr. Chavez clearly qualified as a displaced person, and was entitled to relocation <br />assistance and a notice of eligibility for the same. However, such a notice was not forthcoming. <br />The October 2013 letter was not accepted by Mr. Chavez, and the specter of the Project remained <br />as a cloud on title for the Subject Property since that time. <br />Since 2013, Mr. Chavez has worked to develop information from the City's own files to <br />demonstrate the flawed nature of this Project. The City's own actions have further clarified the <br />flaws in the Project, yet the Staff Report and Proposed Resolution of Necessity neither fix the <br />flaws or even address the issues. <br />A public entity's right to exercise the power of eminent domain is restricted by two <br />constitutional mandates: (1) the public entity's right to take the property at issue; and (2) the <br />amount of just compensation to be awarded to the property owner for the taking. Cal. Const. <br />Art. I, § 19; City of Anaheim v. Michel (1968) 259 Cal.App.2d 835, 837. Here, the first <br />component is being challenged. <br />The fundamental prerequisite to the exercise of eminent domain is that a public entity <br />must hold a public hearing and adopt a proper resolution of necessity. Code of Civil Procedure <br />§§ 1240.030; 1245.220; 1245.230(b). The resolution of necessity must establish the three <br />requirements of § 1240.030: <br />(a) The public interest and necessity require the project; <br />(b) The project is planned or located in the manner that will be <br />most compatible with the greatest public good and the least <br />private injury; and <br />(c) The property sought to be acquired is necessary for the project. <br />4050975.1 --N7475.1 <br />