Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. William Rothacker, It. <br />April l3, 2016 <br />Page 5 <br />the City of Santa Ana Zoning Code. In thruway, the shared parking approach starts <br />front the City's own code ratios and results in the "design level" parking supply needs <br />of a site. <br />It should be rioted that the "demand" results of the shared panting calculation are <br />intended to be used directly for comparison to site supply. No further adjustments or <br />contingency additions are needed because such contingencies are already built into <br />the peal( panting ratios and time of day profiles used in the calculation. <br />There is all important common element between the traditional "code" and tlue shared <br />parking calculation methodologies; the peals parking ratios or "highpoint" for each <br />land use's parking profile typically equals the "code" parking ratio for that Ilse. The <br />analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared <br />Parking, 2' "r Edition publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI). <br />Shared parking calculations for Target Center utilize hourly parking accumulations <br />developed from field studies of single developments in free- standing settings, where <br />travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for <br />calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the <br />shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peals parking demand times, an <br />increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the center. <br />Shared Parking Ratios and Profiles <br />The parking ratios mentioned previously in the code section were used directly for <br />each of the land uses. The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of <br />peals demand) utilized in this analysis and applied to the Target Center are 'based on <br />profiles developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published hl Shared <br />Parking, 2 "`r Edition. The ULl publication presents hourly parking demand profiles <br />for three (3) general land use categories: retail, medical /dental, and fast -food <br />restaurant. ULI profiles of parking demand have been used directly, by land use type, <br />in the analysis of this site and are applied to the City's applicable parking ratio. The <br />fast -food restaurant profile was applied to the restaurant uses. <br />Application of Shared Parking Methodology <br />Tables 3 and 4 presents the theoretical weekday and weekend parking demand <br />profiles for Target Center based on the shared parking methodology, assuming Full <br />occupancy of the center including the proposed tenant mix. <br />Review of Tables 3 and 4 indicates that the future fill occupancy weekday peak <br />parking demands will occur at L00 PM with theoretical peak demands of 946 spaces. <br />31 B -16 <br />