Laserfiche WebLink
more collisions and fatalities at the beginning of the project, sooner rather than <br />later. An unidentified member of the community commented on possible <br />immediate improvements with safety including engineering, solar lighting <br />boxtop crosswalks, and provided an example of 17th and Bristol where the street <br />lines cannot be seen at night. He also suggested contacting the DMV regarding <br />signal timing and synchronization. <br />7. STATUS UPDATE ON THE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE {Strategic <br />Plan No. 5, 3} <br />Executive Director of Planning and Building Hassan Haghani stated that this item <br />was initiated by an applicant for a 1200 -unit project, and the developer is <br />required to pay the entire in -lieu fee. The developer wants to build the project in <br />three phases and asked to pay the $9 million in -lieu fee in phases. The ordinance <br />was reviewed extensively by the staff with the help of the City Attorney's Office, <br />but it was found that there was no way to administratively allow the developer to <br />pay in phases. The developer asked for an administrative remedy and was <br />advised that they could apply for an amendment to the Housing Opportunity <br />Ordinance subject to approval by Planning Commission, public hearing, City <br />Council and a meeting with stakeholders. A meeting of stakeholders was held on <br />July 6, 2016, and stakeholders were briefed on the situation and were advised <br />with specifics on the possible changes. The City is processing the application per <br />California law, taking public comments now, and comment letters are invited. <br />Chairman Sarmiento asked the reason rules may be changed at the last moment <br />when the developer had years to negotiate the terms, and noted that there is now <br />a 50% partner to be taken into consideration. He shared that this is a time - <br />sensitive issue due to lack of adequate housing, and resident interests should be <br />taken into consideration rather than developers only; and this sensitive issue <br />should have been presented to this committee in a timely manner. Committee <br />member Benavides commented on being business- and development -friendly, <br />and that a request to phase the payment was not unreasonable under the <br />circumstances. Chairman Sarmiento asked the City Manager to research and <br />provide a compromise, take a look at other options and see if there's a way to <br />address concerns. <br />COMMITTEE MEMBER COMMENTS - None <br />FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS - None <br />ADJOURN/ED — 6:30 P.M. <br />n <br />Lq�` e Orti <br />R4cording Secretary <br />Public Works Agency <br />Development & Transportation Council Committee Minu 4 14 July 7, 2016 <br />