My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
55G - RESO - SANCTUARY CITY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2016
>
12/06/2016
>
55G - RESO - SANCTUARY CITY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2017 5:40:08 PM
Creation date
12/1/2016 5:38:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Manager's Office
Item #
55G
Date
12/6/2016
Destruction Year
2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resolution to Declare the City of Santa Ana a Sanctuary for All Its Residents <br />December 6, 2016 <br />Page 2 <br />engage in immigration enforcement by drawing limits on the nature of non - federal engagement in <br />immigration enforcement. <br />While many state and local jurisdictions throughout the United States have adopted polices or <br />practices that limit their own jurisdictions' federal civil immigration law enforcement efforts, the <br />federal government has not made a formal legal determination as to whether those state and <br />local laws or policies violate these provisions. And although there is no legal definition, these <br />laws or policies are sometimes referred to as "sanctuary policies ", while the jurisdictions <br />themselves are sometimes referred to as "sanctuary cities" or "sanctuary jurisdictions ". <br />Through various forms of official communications from U.S. President -elect Donald J. Trump, he <br />has expressed his opposition to "sanctuary policies" and "sanctuary cities ". For example, in <br />October 2016, President -elect Trump released his 100 -day action Plan to Make America Great <br />A gin, which states that he will "cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities ". During his <br />campaign, President -elect Trump's rhetoric has incited fear among many individuals throughout <br />the United States, particularly among individuals who identify as being part of a marginalized, <br />minority, and /or unprivileged group. In response to President -Elect Trump's plan, local officials in <br />more than ten major cities, including San Francisco, Oakland, Los Angeles, New York, Chicago <br />and Washington, D.C., reaffirmed their commitment to upholding their status as "sanctuary cities ", <br />even in the face of federal threats. <br />Furthermore, many cities and towns throughout the United States have adopted or enacted <br />resolutions, ordinances, policies, and practices to demonstrate their commitment to equal, <br />respectful, and dignified treatment of all people, regardless of their immigration status, and as a <br />result may be referred to as a "Sanctuary City ", even though there is no legal definition for <br />"Sanctuary City ". The City of Santa Ana desires to similarly demonstrate its commitment to its <br />residents by unequivocally stating that it will provide a sanctuary to all residents who are fearful <br />by assuring them that the City will not expend any funds, nor use its resources, including staff, to <br />administer federal immigration law which is the exclusive authority of the federal government. In <br />response to discussion brought forth at the November 15, 2016 meeting, staff has prepared a <br />resolution for City Council consideration. This resolution is indicative of the City's commitment to <br />social justice. <br />If this resolution is adopted, the City would be required to implement various policies required by <br />the resolution. These policies include the following: protecting sensitive information; reaffirming <br />the City's commitment to preventing biased -based policing and disallowing the use of City <br />resources for immigration enforcement; exercising maximum discretion in policing; providing <br />additional training for all affected City employees, officials, and agents; and the feasibility of <br />establishing a task force for oversight. <br />55G -2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.