CORRESPONDENCE- 75B - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

450 West Fourth Street Suite 130 Santa Ana, CA 42701 Ph; 714,542 -7792 Fax; 714 -542 -4853 lati nohealthoccess.org The amendment gave certainty for the development of market -.rate and affordable housing projects and provided different options to meet the city's affordable housing goals. In particular, it provided the developer with the option to provide affordable housing units on -site or to pay an in -lieu fee. In February of 2016, the City Council made a big decision to rezone over 18 acres of land from light industrial to residential, allowing for the development of a 1,221 unit market -rate development, the Heritage Village Project, and providing a significant windfall profit to the developer. At that time the developer elected to receive the incentives and entitlements in full in exchange for paying the reduced in -lieu fee. The Heritage Village Project developer committed to a very important community benefit, specifically the payment of nearly $10 million in incluslonary housing in -lieu fees. The City has made efforts to meet the affordable housing need with the Housing Opportunities Ordinance as a policy to help promote and ensure the development of affordable housing for low and very low income residents. It is necessary that the City continue to move forward in its efforts. The payment of nearly $10 million in incluslonary housing in -.lieu fees is needed now; we cannot afford to wait for phased payments. The approval of this proposed amendment to the Development Agreement will be a setback and provide uncertainty for the future development of affordable housing. We strongly oppose amending the Development Agreement as requested by Heritage Village OC, LLC /Alliance Residential. The developer sought to amend the Housing Opportunity Ordinance and the Planning Commission voted against recommending the proposed amendment to the Clty Council on Monday, July 25, 2016. The Housing Opportunities Ordinance has been preserved and adopting this amendment to the Development Agreement would undermine its preservation, The Planning Commission recognized this on Monday, November 14, 2016 when they voted against recommending the approval of the amendment to the Development Agreement to the City Council. We strongly urge the City Council to vote against approving the amendment to Development Agreement No. 2015 -08, Sincerely, Nancy Mejia, MSW, MPH Director of Community Engagement & Advocacy Programs PREVENTION EDUCATION ACTION