My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC. A-76-42
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC. A-76-42
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 2:06:45 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 2:06:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
A-76-42
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
3/7/1977
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and Commissions shall be vested with subpoena power. The <br /> motion was seconded by Councilman Ward and carried <br /> unanimously 6 : 0. (This 'would require an amendment . to <br /> Section 906 of the City Charter.) CA 129 <br /> EXTENSION OF CONTRACT After a lengthy <br /> GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION discussion, the <br /> GRANTED SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATIONS request for a one-year <br /> extension (from Octo- <br /> ber 31, 1978 to October 31, 1979) of the refuse collection <br /> contract was granted, subject to negotiations among the <br /> Staff, the Contractor and a representative of the City <br /> Council during the next 45 days , at which time a report <br /> shall be, submitted for Council approval, on the motion of <br /> .Councilman Ward, seconded by Councilman Bricken, and �. <br /> carried 4 : 2, with Councilmen Brandt and Ortiz dissenting. <br /> A subsequent motion by Councilman Bricken, seconded by <br /> Councilman Yamamoto, and unanimously approved 6: 0, authorized r- `-°'C <br /> Mayor Garthe to be the Council representative, or to select r-----73s . At. <br /> a Council representative to participate in the negotiations .f'' <br /> The motion authorized negotiation in good fait-h on all items ,, `R- ' <br /> relating to the contractual relationship now and in the <br /> future, and provided that items of disagreement and agree= o'er-� � � i <br /> ment be included in the report ; and that subjects for dis- <br /> cussion <br /> is cussion and report include, but not be limited to, the - � <br /> following: <br /> 1) A proposal of the scope of continuing negotia- <br /> tions , including the possible development of <br /> a request for proposal (RFP) for a consultant <br /> to do a study on key contract questions , such <br /> as the advantage or disadvantage of re-bidding <br /> or extending the present contract, rate compari- <br /> sons -and reclamation possibilities ; <br /> 2) A description of the extent of financial dis- <br /> closure or accountability by Great Western; <br /> and - <br /> 3) Other items set forth in the Assistant City <br /> Manager' s reports of October 11 and December 15 , <br /> 1976. <br /> Mr. H. Rodger Howell, Rutan and Tucker, representing the con- <br /> tractor, requested that a one-year extension, instead of the <br /> previously requested three years , be granted with the under- <br /> standing that the year of 1977 be devoted to a good faith <br /> commitment on the part of the Contractor and the Staff of <br /> the City, who will sit down and spend the time to go through <br /> the long list of items,: that has been developed to see if the <br /> ultimate arrangement can be devised that meets all the concerns <br /> expressed by the Staff, the public and the Council ; that if <br /> successful a milestone will have been achieved in public <br /> affairs / private enterprise cooperation; that the Contrac- <br /> tor has had a good relationship with the City and wishes the <br /> opportunity to continue it. A-76-42 <br /> CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 471 DECEMBER 20 , 1976 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.