My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1978
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1978
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 2:50:19 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 2:50:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
12/19/1977
Expiration Date
12/31/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The following written communications were received and considered <br /> by Council prior to adoption of the motion: <br /> 1) Letter dated December' 28, 1977 from 'F. *. Blackman of <br /> Great Western Reclamation; Inc. , requesting Council approval <br /> ofa three-year extension of the existing contract ; <br /> 2) Letter dated December 28, 1977 from Moore and Hanson, 214 <br /> South Broadway, recommending Council authorize a bid call <br /> for a new trash collection contract; <br /> 3) Letter dated December 28, 1977 from Thomas Elsea, 1502 E. <br /> First Street, recommending open competition trash collec- <br /> tion service ; <br /> 4) Letter dated December 28, 1977 from C. A. Ranney, Jr. , <br /> President of Cal-Compack Foods, Inc. , 4906 W. First Street, <br /> recommending open competition for industrial trash collec- <br /> tion. <br /> City Manager Bruce Spragg stated that the cost estimate to the <br /> City of a three-year extension of the present contract With <br /> Great Western Reclamation would be $260 ,000 more than the cost <br /> for the previous three years , based on the assumption that the <br /> City, would have the same kind of experience' with the cost of <br /> living increase 'and with the adjustments that were negotiated <br /> - after the labor settlement.; that based on the negotiations that <br /> have been attended by Councilman Ortiz and Assistant City Manager <br /> Ronald Wolford the Negotiating Team recommendation to bid a <br /> new contract would be in the best interests of the City. <br /> Vice Mayor Ward said that he never supported the contract with <br /> a cost of living increase provision plus open negotiations <br /> later for extra equipment and strikes . <br /> Councilman Ortiz responded that the contract proposed by the <br /> City during negotiations would not give both the cost of living <br /> increase •and later open negotiations for labor costs . <br /> Lillian Wolf of 3124 South Main Street , who manages apartment <br /> buildings in several Orange County Cities , said that she uses <br /> 19• bins at her Santa Ana apartments which are picked up <br /> three times a week at a cost of $674 per month; that she uses 21 bins <br /> with three pickups a week in Costa Mesa at a cost of $483; that <br /> it seems unreasonable that Santa Ana charges $200 more per month <br /> than Costa Mesa for about the same service ; and that Great <br /> Western Reclamation refuses to clean, repaint or replace dirty, <br /> damaged bins . <br /> Mr A. Stark, 720 South Lyon, stated that he had been in the <br /> rubbish industry for 23 years , and that competitive bidding <br /> for a new contract would give the citizens of Santa Ana much <br /> better service and a much better rate. CA 11.4 <br /> R- 70-yam <br /> RECONSIDERATION - LEAGUE OF CITIES Vice Mayor Ward's motion <br /> ORANGE COUNTY - DIVISION for reconsideration was <br /> QUARTERLY DUES PAYMENT- APPROVED seconded by Councilman <br /> Bricken and carried 4 : 2 , <br /> with Councilmen Ortiz and Yamamoto dissenting.- (Minutes Page 6) <br /> On the motion of Councilman Bricken, seconded by Councilman <br /> Brandt, carried 4 :2 with Councilmen Yamamoto- and Ortiz dissenting, <br /> payment of quarterly dues (January, February, March 1978) to <br /> the Orange County Division, League of California Cities in the <br /> amount of $1 ,049 was authorized. CA 148.1 <br /> CITY COUNCIL MINUTES _ 10 JANUARY 3, 1978 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.