Laserfiche WebLink
SA 3� <br /> a� <br /> REQUEST FOR ` ° fa <br /> COUNCIL ACTION AMU <br /> Rc <br /> PREPARED BY Pity Negotiating Taam DATE OF COUNCIL ACTION <br /> DATE 12-11-77 PHONE 4186 <br /> SUBJECT REPORT ON N??GOTTATTONS FOR <br /> EXTENSION OF TRASH COLLECTION <br /> CONTRACT <br /> APPROVED <br /> DEPARTMENT HEAD DEPUTY CITY MANAGER ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER CLERK OF THE COUNCIL <br /> RECOMMENDED ACTION <br /> That the City Council authorize termination of negotiations between. the City <br /> and Great Western Reclamation, Inc. , and direct staff to prepare general <br /> specifications to bring back to City Council , preparatory to authorizing a <br /> call for competitive bids on a new contract to begin November 1 , 1978 . <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> The negotiations between the contractor' s team and the City' s team are at a <br /> deadlock. The contractor' s preferred proposal contains an increase of 7% in <br /> the residential rate and continues the Consumer Price Index (CPI) methodology <br /> with a re-open clause if labor or other costs escalate beyond certain levels, <br /> and would cost the City an estimated $3,719, 771 during the three-year period, <br /> 1978 , 1979 , and 1980 . This offer is predicated on retention of an exclusive <br /> franchise for the furnishing of commercial bins and further provides for a <br /> 4 . 7% increase in bin rates . The contractor has submitted an alternative <br /> offer for residential service only, with open competition on bins , at a three- <br /> year cost of $4 ,137 ,950. <br /> In comparison to the alternative proposal, the City' s consulting engineer, <br /> Ralph Stone and Company, estimates that under competitive bidding conditions , <br /> the cost for residential collection for the same three-year period be about <br /> $3 , 577, 000 with open competition for all bin service. This amounts to a <br /> difference of $561 ,000 over the three-year period or about 16% . <br /> The consultant recommends that if the contractor cannot agree to a three-year <br /> price at or below the $3,577, 000 figure , then the City should seek competitive <br /> bids for a new contract and proceed with development of general specifications <br /> for Council review prior to development of detail specifications for bidding <br /> purposes. The City negotiating team agrees with this recommendation--we feel <br /> that open competition in the market place is the best way to achieve the most <br /> favorable price for the citizens of Santa Ana. The attached chart shows how <br /> much other Orange County cities are paying their contractors . The average <br /> payment for a single-family home is $2. 14 per month for 18 cities and $2.16 <br /> for the largest seven cities . Our contractor now receives $2.13 but is asking <br /> $2. 29 starting January 1, 1978 . <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> The present contract with Great Western, Inc. , started November 1 , 1963 and <br /> was to run for a period of seven years . Two four-year extensions have been <br /> granted, the last of which extends the contract period to October 31 , 1978 . <br /> In December, 1976, the City Council , after considering a new request for an <br /> extension, appointed Councilman Ortiz as the chairman of a City negotiating <br /> team consisting of Mr. Ortiz, City Manager Bruce Spragg, and Assistant City <br /> Manager Ron Wolford. The team was to negotiate acceptable terms for the City <br /> in exchange for a contract extension. <br /> Two negotiation sessions were held in January, 1977. The contractor' s team <br /> agreed that they would present a multi-year fixed price proposal to the City <br /> e��0Wrio,90 <br /> 615 <br /> U z <br /> ,3/ 1 <br /> 7"F6 g16 <br />