My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 3:37:03 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 3:36:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
1976
Council Approval Date
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
[ _ —--— <br /> TrashContract <br /> Page 5 <br /> For budgeting purposes, the proposed net additional total cost to the City <br /> each fiscal year would be as follows : <br /> ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL <br /> FISCAL YEAR - COST TO CITY <br /> 11/1/75-6/30/76 $ 43 ,300 <br /> 7/1/76-6/30/77 73 , 000 <br /> 7/1/77-6/30/78 82,000 <br /> 7/1/78-6/30/79 89 ,600 - <br /> 7/1/79-6/30/80 96 ,700 <br /> 7/1/80-6/30/81 103 ,500 <br /> 7/1/81-10/31/81 35,300 <br /> TOTAL $523,400 <br /> 1 <br /> In the Great Western Reclamation, Inc. letter of November 25, 1975 the <br /> last paragraph states as follows : <br /> Certain confidential records supporting Great Western Reclama- <br /> tions proposed rate adjustment are available to the Mayor and <br /> City Council for review upon request. <br /> It is unclear as to what is meant by the word "certain" as used in the <br /> above paragraph. Great Western Reclamation has been informed by the staff <br /> that the information needed includes a certified audit report with financial <br /> statements showing 1) capital investment of Great Western Reclamation, Inc. ; <br /> 2) profit and loss statements; and 3) corporate tax returns for the years <br /> 1970-75. <br /> This financial information is required before staff can recommend a supple- <br /> mental monthly rate increase because the original intent of the CPI adjust- <br /> ment was to cover inflation. Furthermore, it would seem that it would be <br /> in the best interest of the Mayor and the City Council if these financial <br /> records were made available to the City of Santa Ana Finance Department <br /> and the Certified Public Accounting firm hired by the City as its auditor <br /> to review the financial data. This financial information would receive the <br /> same confidentiality as current sales records of Santa Ana firms . <br /> An equitable procedure for a supplemental increase in residential rates <br /> similar to that for commercial bin rates could be established (reference <br /> commentary on amendment #6 above) . <br /> 10. The contractor has requested a two year extension of the currentcontract <br /> from October 31 , 1978 to October 31 , 1980. It is understandable that the <br /> contractor desires a longer contract period over which to amortize his <br /> equipment (IRS apparently requires a minimum of 5 years for tax purposes) , <br /> and in which to plan more capital expenditures for equipment and plant. <br /> A modern trash compactor truck costs approximately $45, 000, and it requires <br /> approximately 18 of these to service Santa Ana 's residential population. <br /> The staff' s report of December 31 , 1975 regarding the request for extension <br /> of contract period by refuse collection contractor, Great Western Reclam- <br /> ation, Inc. contains the following rationale as to why the contract should <br /> be extended. <br /> The low level of customer complaints and a general appraisal of the con- <br /> tractor' s performance indicate that the quality of service performed by the <br /> contractor is high. Great Western Reclamation has provided this service <br /> since 1963 and has performed exceptionally well even during two periods of <br /> labor crisis and one of serious fuel shortage. <br /> We have compared Santa Ana 's costs and complaints with the seven largest <br /> cities in Orange County. There is an average cost to the single-family <br /> residence of $1. 77 per month compared to Santa Ana ' s cost of $2. 00 per <br /> month. Complaint levels run from 28 - 66 per month compared to Santa Ana' s <br /> of 70 - 90 per month. On a per capita cost basis, the average is $0.49 <br /> per month and Santa Ana' s is $0.40 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.