My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 3:37:03 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 3:36:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
1976
Council Approval Date
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cerritos rebid their contract in 1973. The new rate for single family residential <br /> service, once a week pickup, is $1 .62 per month. The former rate was $1 .75. They <br /> received light competitive proposals and the quality of service is very good. Bill- <br /> ing is by the City on the water bill . City does not have the right to audit finincial <br /> records but rate adjustments are negotiated based primarily on rate of inflation. <br /> Contractor has exclusive rights on residential collection but not on commercial . <br /> Cerritos population is 47,000. <br /> Palms Springs bid their contract in 1972 converting from municipal operation to <br /> use of private contractor. The contract bid was $4.00 a month but this includes <br /> backyard pickup twice a week. Five firms submitted competitive bids . Both residential <br /> and commercial pickup are exclusive to the contractor. Billing is by the contractor. <br /> City is able to audit financial records and adjustments are generally based on inflation. <br /> Palm Springs population is 28,000 summer and 40,000 winter. <br /> SURVEY DATA <br /> Four exhibits have been prepared by the BAMA team to assist the City Manager and <br /> City Council in gaining a perspective on prevailing practices in the industry and <br /> how the Santa Ana experience fits into the total picture. These exhibits are <br /> described as follows: <br /> Exhibit A is a survey of the eight largest Orange County cities including Santa Ana. <br /> It shows the name of the contractor, the rate of payment, method of adjustment, <br /> disclosure of financial records, start and length of current contract, frequency <br /> of pickup, earliest starting times, amount charged to the customers and other data. <br /> Exhibit B is a survey excluding Orange County cities of residential collection <br /> operations in all nine cities of Southern California over 100,000 population, except <br /> for Los Angeles. Eight of the nine cities use municipal forces for the collection <br /> of refuse rather than through private contract. The amount charged per month, the <br /> per capita cost, and other pertinent information is included. <br /> Exhibit C is a survey of the same nine Southern California cities with respect to commercial <br /> refuse collection. In all cases except Long Beach and San Bernardino commercial collection <br /> is done by private firms. Most of them provide for a number of commercial contractors <br /> competing for the business. Only in two cases , Riverside and Santa Ana, does the contractor <br /> have an exclusive contract. The monthly charges for 3 cubic yard container are also <br /> shown. <br /> Exhibit D is a comparison per capita refuse collection costs for the larger cities of <br /> Orange County. <br /> GENERAL INFORMATION <br /> Refuse collection is generally accepted as a governmental responsibility because it is <br /> so closely connected with public health and welfare. Preparation, storage, collection <br /> and disposal of solid wastes are therefore subject to public regulations at all govern- <br /> levels. The courts have held that in this regard a municipality acts in its governmental <br /> capacity and not in its corporate or private capacity when handling solid waste. Although <br /> adequate solid waste service is a public responsibility, the actual operation of the <br /> system may be either by municipal forces, contractors or private firms. <br /> A survey by the American Public Works Association of 661 North American Cities in 1973 <br /> indicated that only 39% have municipal refuse collection service and the remaining <br /> receive service from the private sector, generally by contract between the collector <br /> and the municipality. In some cases private collection is performed under franchise <br /> or by direct negotiation with individual residents. In Orange County only two govern- <br /> mental agencies have departments and personnel for the actual collection of refuse. <br /> These are Newport Beach and Midway City Sanitary District, the latter serving generally <br /> the city of Westminster. <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.