My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 3:37:03 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 3:36:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
1976
Council Approval Date
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> October 31, 1975 <br /> Page 2 <br /> The City of Orange has granted it's refuse contractor a rate of $1.50 per water meter or <br /> an increase of 31¢ per unit. Orange does not have an automatic Consumer Price Index adjustment <br /> The City of Huntington Beach granted a refuse rate adjustment from $1.82 for twice a week <br /> pickup to once a week pickup for $1.92. The City extended the refuse contract until July <br /> 31, 1980. The last contract was from July 16, 1971 to February 18, 1976. The contractor <br /> for Huntington Beach must request a rate increase from the City Council since Huntington <br /> Beach does not use the Consumer Price Index to give the refuse contractor automatic rate <br /> increases. Also, a single cash payment of $30,000 was made to Huntington Beach' s refuse <br /> contractor. <br /> The City of Anaheim has given its contractor a temporary increase of 25¢ per electric me- <br /> ter. This increases the rate paid to the contractor to $1.55 per electric meter. The ref- <br /> use contractor is required to submit a certified audit report which will state the revenues <br /> and expenses of the contractor. From this information, the city auditor can determine if <br /> the 25¢ rate increase is justified based on the contractor's new union labor agreement. <br /> With the audit report, the Anaheim City Auditor states he will be able to develop accurate <br /> cost and expense information to determine what effect the recent labor wage agreement will <br /> have on the expenses of the refuse contractor. In the certified audit report, the certi- <br /> fied public accounting firm will explain any changes in accounting methods that would af- <br /> fect the revenues and expenses of the refuse contractor. The certified audit report is <br /> to be submitted to the City of Anaheim by December 31, 1975. <br /> It is a known fact that the refuse contractor's expenses have been increasing, but if his <br /> profits have also been increasing, then his revenues may have been able to offset his ex- <br /> penses. <br /> The City of Santa Ana is the only city surveyed that grants a Consumer Price Index adjust- <br /> ment twice a year. Great Western has been granted refuse rate increases at a faster rate <br /> than other refuse contractors surveyed. Therefore, Great Western has recovered its oper- <br /> ating expenses at a faster rate, assuming that the Consumer Price Index, in fact, keeps <br /> pace with rising expenses. <br /> The cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, and Orange have requested their refuse contractor to <br /> provide the City Council with financial statements to prove to the City that the refuse <br /> contractor deserves a rate increase. These cities review the contractor's balance sheet <br /> and profit and loss statements to determine the financial condition of the contractor. <br /> Santa Ana has not received similar information from the contractor. <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> In August, 1975, the City's refuse contractor, Great Western Reclamation, Inc. , requested <br /> the following supplemental monthly labor payments effective: <br /> Monthly Cumulative <br /> Payment Payment <br /> Retroactive to May 1, 1975 $.30 per water meter $ .30 <br /> May 1, 1976 . 10 per water meter .40 <br /> May 1, 1977 .10 per water meter .50 <br /> Cumulative $.50 per water meter $ .50 <br /> Great Western Reclamation, Inc. has proposed the following changes to the refuse contract <br /> to become effective November 1, 1975. They have requested a supplemental monthly labor <br /> payment in addition to the Consumer Price Index rate adjustment granted each May and Novem- <br /> ber. This rate adjustment is being requested because the contractor's labor costs have <br /> increased due to settlement of a new union labor contract in May of 1975. The base pay <br /> for a refuse truck driver has increased from $3.28 to $4.00 per hour (22%) in addition to <br /> increases in fringe benefits. The contractor is asking for the following supplemental month- <br /> ly labor payments effective: <br /> Monthly Cumulative <br /> Payment Payment <br /> November 1, 1975 $.15 per water meter $.15 <br /> November 1, 1976 .10 per water meter .25 <br /> November 1, 1977 .10 per water meter .35 <br /> Cumulative $.35 per water meter $.35 <br /> Great Western wants to eliminate the refuse contract payments which are paid to Santa Ana <br /> for the City consent to the sale of Great Western to SCA Services , Inc. On December 10, <br /> 1973, Great Western Reclamation agreed to pay the City of Santa Ana for the right to sell <br /> the stock to Great Western Reclamation.. The agreement reads, "The owners of all the stock <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.