My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2017 3:37:03 PM
Creation date
2/23/2017 3:36:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
1976
Council Approval Date
1/19/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,�` MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING <br /> OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE <br /> CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA <br /> August 18, 1975 <br /> The meeting was called to order in Room 831 , City Hall , 20 <br /> Civic Center Plaza, at 12 :15 P.M. by Mayor John Garthe , <br /> proper notice and posting having been accomplished, with <br /> affidavits on file in the office of the Clerk of the Council . <br /> The following Councilmen were present : Gordon Bricken , Harry <br /> K. Yamamoto , Vernon S. Evans , James E. Ward, and Mayor John <br /> Garthe . Councilmen David L. Brandt and David F. Ortiz were <br /> absent. The following staff members were also. present : City <br /> Manager Bruce C. Spragg, City Attorney Keith L. Gow, Director <br /> of Planning Charles C. Zimmerman, Assistant Director of Public <br /> Works John Stevens , Assistant Fire Chief Raymond H. Bachtelle , <br /> and Clerk of the Council Florence I . Malone . Lynn O' Dell , <br /> reporter for "The Register", was also present . <br /> PARAMEDIC PROGRAM The City Manager <br /> added to his status <br /> report dated August 12 , <br /> with an oral presenta- <br /> tion, using charts which described the paramedic program <br /> and its costs over the past ten months . He stated that a <br /> second paramedic unit should be in operation by December <br /> 1976 , at which time the existing unit would be used for <br /> standby purposes ; that under a proposed contract with the <br /> Santa Ana-Tustin Community Hospital , recommended user fees <br /> would be billed and collected by the hospital , at a cost of <br /> $3. 00 each; and that no one would be refused service because <br /> of inability to pay the user fee . He further added that <br /> although the Board of Supervisors had not acted to designate <br /> the Santa Ana-Tustin Community Hospital as a paramedic base <br /> training hospital, the Board had requested a report from the <br /> County Administrative Officer on the current training situa- <br /> tion for firemen paramedics within three weeks. . CA 64. 2 <br /> TRASH RATES The City Manager <br /> referred to his <br /> reports of August 1 <br /> and 13 , regarding <br /> a recommended 11% refuse rate increase to maintain the <br /> program on a self-supporting basis for fiscal year 1975-76 , <br /> and stated that the increase amounted to 20¢ more per, month <br /> for the single family home owner (from the present 51. 80 to <br /> $2 . 00) . He further stated that the refuse contractor, Great <br /> Western Reclamation, had requested a retroactive rate adjust- <br /> ment because of increased labor costs which would amount to <br /> 30¢ per water meter, commencing May 1, 1975 and ending <br /> April 30 , 1976 , at which time it would advance to 40¢ per <br /> water meter through April 30 , 1977, with a final increase <br /> of 50¢ per water meter commencing May 1 , 1977 ; that the <br /> administration does not have enough information to make a <br /> good judgment on the merit of the request, because it <br /> involves the profitability of the franchise . He commended <br /> the contractor' s services , and suggested that the -Council <br /> support the 11% increase in trash rates recommended by the <br /> staff, and authorize an audit of the residential and commer- <br /> cial services performed by the contractor, to include the <br /> possibility of an extension of the contract, with a target <br /> date of December, 1975 for report and recommendation to the <br /> City Council. He pointed out that the contractor' s request <br /> would require a 70¢ increase (from $1. 80 to $2. 50 per month) <br /> for the single family homeowner trash rate . <br /> CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 345 AUGUST 18 , 1975 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.