My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC. A-73-66
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC. A-73-66
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2017 8:36:23 AM
Creation date
2/28/2017 8:36:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.
Contract #
A-73-66
Agency
Public Works
Council Approval Date
12/10/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
22 <br /> 1 confirm the comments of the Mayor, just a few moments ago, <br /> 2 and the answer is , yes , they would be interested in the <br /> 3 merger, but I would have to honestly tell you that my <br /> 4 conversations with the S .C.A. management and the Blackman ' s , <br /> 5 it would have had an effect upon the terms of the merger . <br /> 6 I think that ' s true. They would still be <br />}ryL r4-Te <br /> 7 interested, and we have Great Western and S .C.A. in reliance <br /> 8 on this having been achieved, make a significant investment <br /> 9 in the City of Santa Ana, and are kind of committed to it. <br /> 10 That ' s why we are embarrassed not to have <br /> 11 the stock transfer permitted; having it achieved. <br /> 12 MAYOR PATTERSON: I 'm ready for the motion. Oh, <br /> 13 Mr. Spragg! <br /> 14 MR. SPRAGG: I would like to make a comment that <br /> 15 would go to the format of the motion , because I think there <br /> 16 was an implied statement that the Council was being asked to <br /> 17 vote on a pig in the poke tonight, that you didn 't know what <br /> 18 you were getting into. <br /> 19 From our standpoint, the City Attorney has <br /> 20 had no real input yet on this matter, and if the Council <br /> 21 wishes to go one way or another, whether you approve this in <br /> 22 concept, if you do, we would request that you refer it to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.