My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.- RATE ADJUSTMENTS
Clerk
>
Contracts / Agreements
>
TRASH CONTRACTS & MISC. FRANCHISE AGREEMENTS
>
TRASH / SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION
>
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.- RATE ADJUSTMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/28/2017 11:33:30 AM
Creation date
2/28/2017 11:33:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Company Name
GREAT WESTERN RECLAMATION, INC.- RATE ADJUSTMENTS
Agency
Public Works
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Residential Trash Collection Payments - Cont' d. <br /> Page 2 <br /> however , agree that commitments should be made to the two additional <br /> adjustments of $0 .10 each in the future . It is our opinion that in- <br /> creases in the Consumer Price Index will probably cover these additional <br /> costs which will run about 6% annually. We do not anticipate that the <br /> CPI will show annual increases less than those amounts . <br /> COMPARISON WITH OTHER CITIES <br /> The present rate paid the contractor is $1 .75 per month per water <br /> meter . With an increase of $0 . 15 , the payment to the contractor will <br /> be $1 .90 per month. This compares with the following rates for other <br /> cities in Orange County as shown below: <br /> CITY RATE REMARKS <br /> Anaheim $2 . 44 Actual is $1 . 55/electric meter <br /> Costa Mesa 2 .236 --- <br /> Huntington Beach 1 .92 Will be $2 . 07 July 1976 <br /> Buena Park . 1 . 75 Will be $1 . 85 July 1966 <br /> Fullerton 1 .50 Increase under negotiations <br /> Orange 1 .50 --- <br /> Garden Grove 1 .40 --- <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT <br /> The additional cost to the City due to the $0 . 15 increase will be <br /> $6 , 000 per month or $72 , 000 per year . This is about an 8. 5% increase . <br /> The cancellation of the pay-back feature would cause a loss of revenue <br /> of $2 , 800 per month. <br /> An analysis of revenue and expenditures for current fiscal year <br /> 1975-76 including the $0 . 15 increase indicates that we will pay out <br /> $858 , 000 while receiving revenues of $840 , 000 . Revenues will be only <br /> 2.1% below expenses , which is reasonably close . <br /> An upward adjustment in our charges will be necessary to carry the <br /> program on a self-supporting basis for fiscal year 1976-77. This will <br /> be studied and recommended as part of the budget process now underway. <br /> The present rate being charged a single-family home is $2 . 00 per <br /> month. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The contractor has indicated neither approval nor rejection of the <br /> proposed adjustment , but we feel that it will be acceptable to him. <br /> All the points in the trash contract previously discussed were agreed <br /> upon by Council and the contractor. With those settled , and if these <br /> new adjustments are approved by Council , the City Attorney can <br /> complete the drafting of a revised contract that will be presented to <br /> the Council for approval at their meeting of April 19 , 1976. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.