My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25O - AGMT - USER FEE STUDY
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
04/18/2017
>
25O - AGMT - USER FEE STUDY
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2017 11:13:45 AM
Creation date
4/13/2017 5:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25O
Date
4/18/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Santa Ana I California <br />with one occurrence. Examples where this method could be used are: reviews of applications and permits, <br />requests for specific individual services or inspections, and licenses. <br />A typical case study fee model should comprise the following three general cost layers: <br />1) Central Services Overhead: This category <br />may Involve such costs as labor, services, and <br />supplies that benefit more than one department, <br />division, or project. The exact benefits to specific <br />areas are impossible to ascribe to a single <br />activity. Examples are purchasing, human <br />resources, and liability insurance. As part of the <br />user fee study, these costs are calculated in the <br />overhead cost review. <br />2) Department Overhead: This category may <br />include expenses related to such items as office <br />supplies, outside consultants, and membership <br />dues. It may include management, supervision, <br />and administrative support that are not provided <br />to a direct fee - generating service. Typically, these <br />items are charged, on an item -by -item basis, <br />directly to the department, division, or project. <br />e <br />• <br />3) Personnel Costs: This category refers to <br />Costs _ <br />direct salary and benefit costs of staff hours spent <br />on providing a fee - generating service (e.g., on -site building inspector), <br />N <br />Approach 2; Average Cost Method <br />This is also sometimes referred to as a programmatic approach, because it looks at costs at a program level, <br />and then allocates them to participants on an occurrence basis. By taking total service costs across a <br />substantial sample period (a year), and dividing by the total number of service units delivered over that same <br />period, costs per unit of service is estimated. <br />This approach is useful when services or programs are provided in a more aggregate manner, where it might <br />be difficult to identify a specific sequence of steps associated with one user or participant; or where it is not <br />feasible to cost- effectively segregate costs associated with specific activities. <br />An example of where this approach is applicable is recreational programs. In these cases, residents or <br />customers sign up to participate in a group activity, with one instructor, using a building that is shared by <br />multiple programs or activities. In this case segregating costs associated with one participant would be very <br />difficult; so by determining the cost of a program (such as aquatics for Instance), and attributing that cost to <br />participants based on historical and /or planned participation levels, a cost per user can be calculated. <br />User Fee Study Work Plan <br />Our proposed work plan, described in detail by task, is provided below. We explain how each task will be <br />accomplished, and identify associated meetings and deliverables. We want to ensure our scope provides <br />quality and clarity, and is responsive to the City's needs and specific local circumstances. We will work in <br />concert with the City to adjust our scope as needed during the course of the study. <br />Taxes, fines, utility rates, and penalties are not "user fees' and will not be part of our work plan for this project. <br />However, we will advise the City regarding additional study efforts it may pursue to evaluate fee categories <br />not considered user fees. <br />" Cornprehensive .innovative.Trusted. 13 City of Santa Ana <br />d . , "; User Fee Study <br />250 -17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.