My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
19L - POLICE REVIEW BOARD
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
05/02/2017
>
19L - POLICE REVIEW BOARD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 5:04:34 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 5:03:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
City Attorney's Office
Item #
19L
Date
5/2/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
specific agendas or policies. Requires that members listen to all parties and collect all evidence <br />before analysis is conducted. <br />With Investigatory Powers <br />This model also consists of assigned members and has the additional capability to investigate <br />complaints separately and externally from the police department. The board or commission may <br />make findings as a result of such investigation, and thereon make specific recommendations to <br />law enforcement administrators regarding discipline and/or policy. <br />Advantages: Can provide increased public confidence in misconduct investigations and give the <br />community a greater sense of inclusion. Additional oversight to have investigations and findings <br />from an agency other than the police department. <br />Disadvantages: Members must be highly trained and willing to spend a considerable amount of <br />time in order to conduct fair, unbiased and consistent investigations. Substandard investigations <br />can create major problems for the community and police department. Must have the ability to <br />compel evidence (subpoena) and ability to hear testimony from officers. Would require adequate <br />funding to function properly. Issues of due process for police officers being investigated. <br />Best Practices for All Enforcement Models <br />• Ensure cooperation from within the law enforcement agency by developing an oversight <br />process which is credible, reliable, fair, and provides due process <br />• Sufficient time, planning, and coordination must be allotted in order to establish <br />successful oversight <br />• Members of boards and commissions must be adequately prepared and informed about <br />the relevant details of each case, as well as legislation and governing policies <br />• Oversight must function independently <br />• Members who participate must possess integrity and base all decisions on the facts <br />presented <br />• Participants and administrators must be provided with adequate budgets, training, and <br />time in order to provide effective oversight <br />• Review and oversight must be performed with fairness, patience, and compassion for all <br />parties involved <br />• Promote community awareness regarding citizen complaint procedures (where and how <br />to file a complaint) <br />19L-4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.