My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-03-14 PUBLIC SAFETY, CODE ENFORCEMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT
Clerk
>
Minutes
>
CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEES
>
PUBLIC SAFETY, CODE ENFORCEMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT (as of 2017)
>
2017-03-14 PUBLIC SAFETY, CODE ENFORCEMENT & NEIGHBORHOOD EMPOWERMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2017 8:13:45 AM
Creation date
5/15/2017 8:13:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Minutes
Date
3/14/2017
Destruction Year
P
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
commercial activity. Mr. Schmidt suggests having Code Enforcement officers working on <br /> alternate weekends. <br /> A public comment on Item 3 (Proposed Meeting Schedule) was made by unknown resident who <br /> questioned having only four meetings a year. Chairman Solorio and Vice Chairman Villegas <br /> both stated that special meetings would be considered throughout the year, depending on items <br /> raised. <br /> Peter Katz, President of Corn-Link comments on Item 6, Homelessness. He is continually <br /> getting complaints from all 64 homeowner associations regarding the public safety in this city. <br /> The civic center, the riverbed, the Downtown businesses and neighborhoods are all being <br /> affected; property values going down. Asking this Committee to request County Supervisor Do <br /> and Homeless Czar Susan Price come to City Council because they need to be held accountable. <br /> Ed Murashe, Floral Park Association, comments on Item 9 (Measure BB). He brings up three <br /> issues: homeless issue in the creek bed, traffic issues, and the dispensaries. He would like to see <br /> the fine raised for businesses being a public nuisance so it targets the dispensaries. Floral Park is <br /> having their home tour coming up on March 29-30`h. <br /> Melahat Rafiei representative of the Santa Ana Cannabis Association, makes a public comment <br /> on Item 9 (Measure BB). Her Association represents the permitted dispensaries in the city. <br /> They want to continue working with law enforcement and the City to abide by the law and <br /> regulations of the ordinance. They are asking for some operational changes to the ordinance. <br /> She is very pleased that there is open communication with City staff and City leaders and <br /> policymakers on this issue. <br /> Mike Tardiff, resident, comments on Item 10 (Second Dwelling Ordinance). He would like the <br /> City to have its own ordinance rather than going by State law as it pertains to granny flats. Santa <br /> Ana needs to develop a more restrictive ordinance than the State. New updated State law <br /> provides for wiggle room for cities to formulate an ordinance to fit their individual needs. <br /> Peter Katz, President of Com-Link, comments on Item 10 (Second Dwelling Ordinance). Mr. <br /> Katz supports an additional City ordinance because Santa Ana is a very dense city, parking is <br /> already an issue, and the State law would cause problems between neighbors. A parking <br /> commission could administratively deal with parking issues and suggested a slumlord task force. <br /> Public Comment by Susan Vanderoos, resident, Washington Square neighborhood, addresses <br /> item No. 10. The ordinance allows for some response by the City. She questions protection for <br /> Santa Ana citizens and is concerned because granny flat can go up to 1200 sq. feet in someone's <br /> backyard. Property values have gone down. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.