Laserfiche WebLink
From: Leslie Kato [mailto:leslie.kato@sbcglobal.net] <br />Sent: Monday, May 8, 2017 6:27 AM <br />To: eComment <eComment@santa-ana.org> <br />Subject: Ref: Zoning Administrator - May 10, 2017 - Public Hearing, minor exception 2017-01 <br />(Strategic Plan Nos: 3, 2) <br />Please present/submit the following letter during the public hearing slated for May 10, 2017 <br />regarding a variance allowance for property 1904 North Heliotrope Drive, Santa Ana, CA <br />92706. <br />Unfortunately neither myself or my husband are able to attend the hearing but want to present <br />our concerns. <br />Sincerely, <br />Leslie Kato <br />Mr. Cardinale & Ms. Bernal, <br />Regarding the fence/wall variance requested by the residents of 1904 North Heliotrope Drive, <br />neither my husband, nor myself, support the request for reasons listed below. <br />The family has lived in the neighborhood before and having built a fence on that previously <br />owned property, they were aware of the city's fence/wall height restrictions prior to purchasing <br />their current property. <br />Similar requests by Floral Park residents have been denied. <br />The green rental fence should have been removed after the outside construction was completed, <br />yet it remained in place for over a year. <br />How would the city be able to deny future fence/wall variance requests if this request is <br />permitted? <br />Wouldn't allowance of this variance render the present fence/wall ordinance null and void? <br />What makes this particular request special enough to override the ordinance? <br />Sincerely <br />Stacey & Leslie Kato - 20 Year Residents 2119 North Heliotrope Drive <br />Santa Ana, CA <br />19