My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2017 3:00:08 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 9:25:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-046
Date
7/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
809
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Addendum #2 <br />Physical Improvements: The modifications from 60% design would result in the following changes to Project features <br />from 30% design: <br />1) Track shifted to the center of the PE ROW starting from 140 -ft east of Santa Ana River (SAR) Bridge <br />to 5th Street at -grade crossing resulting in a slight track shift to the southern side of the PE ROW <br />between 5th Street at -grade crossing and the Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF), no private <br />property is required. The Project footprint is not affected by this change. <br />2) Revised location of the TPSS unit. 4 formerly proposed at the north east corner of Santa Ana Blvd. <br />and N. Garfield Ave. to the north side of the parking structure at SARTC, adjacent to N. Santiago <br />Street. The Project footprint is not affected by this change. <br />3) Minor project footprint modifications and anticipated revised construction limits result from the <br />process of advancement of 30% design to 60% design due to the following Project elements: <br />a) Trenching in the public right-of-way (ROW) for drainage improvements and utility connections <br />at West 5th Street, <br />b) Paving, striping, signing, curb ramp and driveway approach improvements at N. Harbor <br />Boulevard (Blvd.), N. Western Avenue (Ave.), N. Forest Street (St.), N. Pacific Ave., N. <br />Hesperian St., N. Bristol St., N. Baker St., N. Spurgeon St., French St., N. Minter St., 4th St., E. <br />Santa Ana Blvd., and Santiago St., <br />c) Temporary Construction Easements (TCE) for a maintenance road turnaround on the east side <br />of the SAR, <br />d) Sidewalk paving re -construction at Nova Academy on the corner of Ross Street and 4th St., and <br />e) Anticipated improvements at the driveway approach to the County of Orange Sherriffs <br />Department Complex on W. Santa Ana Blvd. <br />Operational Improvements: The modifications from 60% design would result in the following changes to the Project's <br />operations from 30% design: <br />1) Reducing the maximum speed within the PE ROW from 45 miles per hour (mph) to 44 mph. <br />2) Implementation of Traffic Signal Priority (TSP) at all traffic signals along the route including at Main <br />Street, Broadway, and Bristol Street. <br />4. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF DESIGN MODIFICATIONS <br />To evaluate whetherthe proposed design modifications would result in a new significant impact, increase in the severity <br />of an impact, or require new mitigation measures, OCTA undertook environmental review and where needed, <br />conducted a technical analysis of each Project feature update. The following technical reports were prepared as part <br />of this analysis and are included as attachments to this Addendum #2: <br />• Visual Impact Analysis Re-evaluation Technical Memo Update, (HDR, February 2017) (Appendix A) <br />• Cultural Resources Technical Memo Update (HDR, February 2017) (Appendix B) <br />• Traffic Study Addendum v4 (IBI Group, February 2017) (Appendix C) <br />• Noise and Vibration Technical Addendum (HDR, February 2017) (Appendix D) <br />The technical analysis was coordinated with the 60% design work that was progressing on the Project. In some cases, <br />specific design modifications were refined based upon analysis undertaken in the 60% design work. <br />The CEQA Guidelines require that a brief explanation be provided to support the findings that no subsequent EIR or <br />Negative Declaration is needed for further discretionary approval. A summary of findings from the re-evaluation of <br />each of the environmental issue areas that were analyzed in the EIR are described below. <br />51 <br />Page 1170726.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.