My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
CITY COUNCIL
>
2011 -
>
2017
>
2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/12/2017 3:00:08 PM
Creation date
7/11/2017 9:25:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Resolution
Doc #
2017-046
Date
7/5/2017
Destruction Year
P
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
809
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Santa Ana/Garden Grove Fixed Guideway Project Addendum #2 <br />Geoloay. Soils. and Seismicit <br />The potential geology, soils, and seismicity impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project were <br />evaluated in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have been no changes to the geological, soils or seismic <br />environment or changes to the characteristics of the proposed Project as evaluated in the EIR that would affect these <br />resources. The EIR concluded that impacts related to geologic and seismic hazards were less than significant and <br />that no mitigation measures are required. No additional geology, soils, and seismicity impact would occur and the <br />conclusions regarding no significant impacts identified in the EIR remain accurate. <br />Hazardous Materials <br />The potential hazardous materials impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project was evaluated <br />in the EIR. Since the certification of the EIR, there have been no changes to the hazardous materials environment or <br />changes to the characteristics of the proposed project as evaluated in the EIR that would affect hazardous materials. <br />As previously identified in the EIR, the Project would require limited acquisition of property which could have the <br />potential to contain hazardous materials. Three properties identified as potentially hazardous sites would be acquired <br />as part of Operations & Maintenance (0&M) Facility Site B (which is the currently proposed location for the 0&M <br />facility). As described in the EIR, a detailed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment would be required to ascertain if <br />employees working at the 0&M Facility would be exposed to toxic levels of hazardous materials. The EIR <br />recommended implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ1 to reduce this potential impact to a level less than <br />significant. Because the proposed design modifications do not involve a change with respect to the location of the <br />proposed 0&M Facility Site B, the conclusions regarding hazardous materials would remain the same. <br />The EIR indicates that operation of the streetcar along the Project alignment would not involve the use of hazardous <br />materials. As stated previously, no change to streetcar maintenance activities is proposed as part of the design <br />modifications, therefore, no new significant impact or the increase in the severity of a significant impact would result. <br />The conclusions that the potential hazardous materials impact would be reduced to a level of less than significant with <br />the implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ1 as identified in the EIR remain accurate. <br />Traffic and Parking <br />The potential traffic and parking related impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project were <br />evaluated in the EIR. <br />Since the certification of the EIR, there have been some changes to the transportation network within the Project area. <br />Also, as described under "Description of Design Modifications," some of the design modifications were determined to <br />have the potential to impact traffic, and further analysis was warranted. The potential traffic and parking impacts <br />associated with the 30% design changes were addressed in Addendum #1. <br />However, in order to evaluate the potential traffic impacts associated with the 60% operational design modification of <br />adding Traffic Signal Priority to intersections at Santa Ana Boulevard/Main Street, Santa Ana Boulevard/Broadway, <br />Santa Ana Boulevard/Bristol Street, 4th Street/Broadway and 4th Street/Main Street, an update to the previously - <br />prepared Traffic Study Addendum v2, see Traffic Study Addendum v4 attached as Appendix C. The purpose of the <br />analysis was to identify any additional changes to traffic impacts that were previously disclosed in the EIR and <br />Addendum #1 that are due to the operational design modification with the advancement of engineering since the Project <br />(and conceptual design) was approved in 2015 and further advanced to 30% design and 60% design. <br />Traffic Signal Priority for the Streetcar. Table 3-7 of the Traffic Study Addendum v4 (see Appendix C) summarizes <br />the delay and corresponding LOS for 2035 Streetcar Conditions, with and without the transit signal priority adjustments, <br />and using Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) Methodology. As shown on Table 3-7, overall intersection delay would <br />change with implementation of Traffic Signal Priority, with minor decreases in delay at some locations, and minor <br />91 <br />Page 1170726.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.