2017-046 - Approving Addendum Nos. 1 and 2

Home Browse Search

Sheet 8: Street improvements proposed within the ROW on N. Baker St. are now included within the APE. Additionally, APN 405-201-13 has been added to the APE due to the proposed improvements at the driveway approach that front W. Santa Ana Blvd. Sheet 10: APN 398-221-19 has been added to the APE due to the proposed improvements at the driveway approach that front W. Santa Ana Blvd. Sheet 12: Street improvements proposed within the ROW on N. Spurgeon St., French St., N. Minter St., and E. 4"' St. are now included within the APE. Sheet 13: Street improvements proposed within the ROW on N. Minter St. and Santiago St. are now included within the APE. Sheet 15: Street improvements proposed within the ROW on N. Minter St. and Santiago St. are now included within the APE. Conclusion Minor updates have been made to the APE in response to comments received from the SHPO in October 14, 2016 regarding the comment to include of the entirety of the Pacific Electric Railroad Bridge (P-30-161847) within the APE of the Project, and to address expanded limits of construction for minor surface improvements and utility trenching and consideration of adjacent parcels to paving re -construction at Nova Academy and anticipated driveway approach improvements at the County of Orange Sherriffs Department Complex (and specifically on the APN containing the Orange County's Coroner Office). These changes have been made and the updated APE map set is attached, (see Sheets 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 15 of Attachment B). The expanded 2017 APE does not include any newly identified historic properties from what has been previously reported for the Project. None of the parcels added to the expanded 2017 APE contain buildings that are 50 years of age or older: • Nova Academy (APN 398-221-19) built in 2005 • Orange County Coroner's Office (APN 405-201-13) built in 1981 Indirect visual and/or audible atmospheric impacts or vibration impacts from changes in construction have been considered in this assessment. There are no known archaeological resources eligible for listing in the NRHP located within the expanded 2017 APE. This current cultural resources analysis confirms that the proposed engineering refinements to the project do not change the previous conclusions regarding cultural resources. No adverse effects are expected for the design modifications under NEPA. Under CEQA, a less than significant impact would remain the finding for the design modifications. The sensitivity of the area for archaeological resources and the recommendation for archaeological monitoring to be conducted for earth -disturbing activities that could encounter previously undisturbed soils remain unchanged and will remain consistent with the 2015 EA/EIR.