Laserfiche WebLink
US Marshal's Terms and Conditions <br />August 1, 2017 <br />Page 2 <br />Between the proposal for additional bed space to accommodate the USM construction needs and <br />the additional general population that has been housed at the Santa Ana Jail, the estimated <br />revenue from these inmates is $8,056,125 for FY 2017-18. <br />Note that none of these inmates are Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) related <br />detainees. These inmates would be pre -trail inmates under the custody of the USM or Federal <br />Bureau of Prisons. <br />In order to accommodate the USM request and the increase in general population inmates, the Jail <br />Operations budget would need to be increased by $6,183,121. The costs are attributed to adding <br />back personnel positions and operating expenses that were removed from the FY 2017/18 budget. <br />Table 1 below illustrates the revised net impact for FY 2017/18. If supported by the City Council, <br />the net operating deficit for FY 2017/18 would be reduced by $4,034,195. This would reduce the <br />amount of one-time funds necessary to balance the budget. For FY 2018/19, an additional <br />$2,242,466 would be realized as deficit savings, which would represent a full year of revenue from <br />all anticipated inmates. <br />Table 1 — Partial FY 2017/18 Year Comparison Holding vs Type II Facility with USM Proposal* <br />Net Change <br />10,217,316 <br />6,183,121 <br />4,034,195 <br />*Compares current plan to transition to Holding Facility Jan. 1 vs. Housing Proposal thatwould include additional USM <br />inmates effective Sept. 1. <br />The proposal would require a budget adjustment to appropriate the revenue and allocate funding <br />in the various salary and contractual accounts. Staff would return to the City Council with the <br />staffing plan, appropriation adjustments and necessary action items at the August 15, 2017 Council <br />Meeting. <br />By continuing jail operations as a Type II Housing Facility, it will prevent the layoff of 26 correctional <br />positions and provide additional time needed to implement jail reuse options, and/or negotiate <br />housing agreements with Federal and State agencies. <br />65C-2 <br />Holding Facility* <br />Type II Facility <br />with USM <br />Increase <br />Revenues <br />2,586,500 <br />12,803,816 <br />Expenditures <br />11,840,586 <br />18,023,707 <br />Net Operating Bal(Def) <br />(9,254,086) <br />(5,219,891) <br />Net Change <br />10,217,316 <br />6,183,121 <br />4,034,195 <br />*Compares current plan to transition to Holding Facility Jan. 1 vs. Housing Proposal thatwould include additional USM <br />inmates effective Sept. 1. <br />The proposal would require a budget adjustment to appropriate the revenue and allocate funding <br />in the various salary and contractual accounts. Staff would return to the City Council with the <br />staffing plan, appropriation adjustments and necessary action items at the August 15, 2017 Council <br />Meeting. <br />By continuing jail operations as a Type II Housing Facility, it will prevent the layoff of 26 correctional <br />positions and provide additional time needed to implement jail reuse options, and/or negotiate <br />housing agreements with Federal and State agencies. <br />65C-2 <br />