Laserfiche WebLink
Well.032 Rehabilitation Engineering Services <br />acceptance parameters and other control <br />system submittals associated with the planned <br />improvements to ensure that all Contractor <br />programming requirements are being executed in <br />compliance with the specifications. It is important to <br />note that while the majority of improvements will be <br />designed for Well #32, much of the FAT and SAT <br />criteria will pertain to John Garthe Pump Station. <br />Well #32 cannot run without John Garthe Pump <br />Station. <br />Key Deliverables (independent of the <br />30%, 60%, 100% and final design set <br />submittals) under this task are as <br />follows: <br />1; Provide a witnessed FAT Checklist for the <br />Contractor's Programmer. 2. <br />2. Provide a witnessed SAT Checklist for the <br />Contractor's Programmer, <br />3. Provide a specification that documents how <br />FAT and SAT testing will be conducted, how <br />discrepancies will be noted, and how the <br />Contractor is expected to note and correct all <br />deficiencies. <br />Tetra Tech will act as the City's agent during <br />factory and on -site functional and performance <br />acceptance testing and snail document and identify <br />all functional and performance discrepancies and <br />coordinate corrective actions to resolve identified <br />discrepancies prior to CityAcceptance. We have <br />assumed 40 hours for FAT validation and 60 hours <br />for SAT validation for Well #32 and John Garthe <br />Pump Station. <br />On an as -needed basis, Tetra Tech shall provide <br />on -site support for commissioning (start-up) <br />activities, in close coordination with the Well #32 <br />Rehabilitation Improvements Contractor and PCS <br />Integrator. We shall be present during system <br />commissioning to verify all aspects of the control <br />system and associated process equipment are <br />exercised and to ensure deficiencies are corrected <br />by the Contractor/PCS Integrator as they are found. <br />Commissioning will not be considered complete <br />until it has determined that all of the system <br />requirements have been met. We have assumed 60 <br />hours for commissioning support. <br />Site Audit Technical Memorandum: <br />The "Site Audit" work sessions shall follow <br />with a summary of hardware assessment <br />findings. This TM will provide recommendations <br />associated with hardware upgrades and <br />standardization. <br />Instrument Databa�; <br />A list of all existing hardware and configuration <br />details shall be submitted for review and <br />comment by the City. A separate list of any <br />proposed hardware shall also be included (this <br />list shall identify which piece of hardware that it <br />will be superseding), The format and proposed <br />fields shall be approved by the City prior to <br />development/submittal of this database. <br />3. Q Database: <br />A list of all system 1/0 and communications <br />interfaces shall be submitted for review and <br />comment by the City. The format and proposed <br />fields shall be approved by the City prior to <br />development/submittal of this database: <br />4. 5fte Operations Technt aLMemorandum (TMi: <br />The "Site Operations" work sessions shall <br />follow with a field summary for review and <br />comment by the City. The memorandum will <br />include an organized summary of existing <br />operating procedures. The TM shall also <br />include recommendations for improvements to <br />system practices and procedures. <br />5. Functional Specification: <br />A functional specification, as described in the <br />scope above, shall be submitted for review and <br />comment by the City. The format and content <br />outline shall be approved by the City prior to <br />final development/submittal. <br />6. FAT/5AT Protocols: <br />Acceptance testing protocols and criteria for all <br />control system and criteria for all control system <br />submittals will be submitted to the City for <br />review and comment. <br />