Laserfiche WebLink
TABLE 5.4 <br />ALTERNATIVE 2 LAND USE SUMMARY <br />Land Use <br />Government Offices <br />Development Plan <br />-IA85,00 square feet <br />Emergency shelter <br />675 hed (164,600 square feet) <br />Equipment Storage <br />30,000 square feet <br />Law Enforcement <br />54,000 square feet <br />Maintenance <br />152,000 square feet <br />Source: KTGY 2016. <br />0 <br />Anticipated actions required for the implementation of Alternative 2 would include the <br />following: <br />• At the County's discretion, a recommendation to the City regarding an appropriate <br />General Plan Amendment and zoning code Amendment pursuant to the Pre -Annexation <br />Agreement, as this alternative exceeds the assumptions in the 2003 OCGP Program EIR <br />• Runoff Management Plan(s) <br />• Water Quality Management Plan(s) <br />• Grading Permits <br />• Building Permits <br />• Encroachment Permits <br />• Acquisition and dedication of rights of entry, easements, and rights-of-way for off-site <br />improvements <br />Impact Evaluation <br />Aesthetics <br />The proposed development under Alternative 2 would change the visual quality of the entire <br />site, similar to the proposed Project. Short-term construction and infrastructure improvements <br />would occur within the same general footprint as the proposed Project. While the intensity of <br />the improvements would be reduced, the long-term changes to the visual setting would be <br />similar compared to the Project. Under this alternative, buildings would be of varying heights <br />and sizes. Also, similar to the proposed Project, the impacts would be less than significant. This <br />alternative would improve visual quality of the site compared to existing conditions because it <br />would remove the majority of the degraded buildings on site. As with the Project, a <br />determination of impacts to visual character is relatively subjective. Changes to the visual <br />quality are expected to be similar compared to the proposed Project because the overall site <br />would be developed; however, Alternative 2 would not have a 50 -foot -wide linear park <br />abutting Marine Way. <br />Proposed development under Alternative 2 would introduce new sources of light and glare that <br />would increase lighting levels on the entire site similar to the proposed Project. Distance from <br />existing and planned uses and proposed landscaping would minimize light and glare spillover. <br />5-32 EL TORO, 100 -ACRE PARCEL DEVELOPMENT PLAN <br />PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br />