My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25A - AGMT HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERV
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
10/17/2017
>
25A - AGMT HISTORIC PROPERTY PRESERV
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2017 8:19:03 PM
Creation date
10/12/2017 8:11:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
25A
Date
10/17/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br />Molfetto House <br />1909 North Poinsettia,Street <br />Santa Ana, CA 92762 <br />NAME <br />Molfetto House <br />REF. NO. <br />ADDRESS <br />1909 North Poinsettia Street <br />CITY <br />Santa Ana <br />ZIP <br />92702 <br />I ORANGE COUNTY <br />YEAR BUILT <br />1939 <br />LOCAL.REGISTER CATEGORY.: Contributive' <br />HISTORIC DISTRICT <br />None <br />NEIGHBORHOOD <br />I Park Santiago <br />CALIF. REGISTER. CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION <br />CI3 <br />CALIFORNIA REGISTERSTATUSCODE <br />5S3 <br />Location: ❑ Not for Publication ® Unrestricted <br />❑ Prehistoric ® Historic ❑ Both <br />ARCHITECTURAL STYLE: Minimal Traditional <br />During the Great Depression through the immediate postwar years, the Minimal Traditional home rose in popularity as the <br />preferred style for middle-class housing in the United'States. This basic house type fulfilled both aesthetic and _social needs: <br />In terms of aesthetics, the.form represented a stripped -down version of the historic -eclectic styles popular in the 1920s. in <br />particular the Tudor and English Revival styles. In social terms, the Minimal Traditionalhome satisfied requirements in <br />square footage and plan by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), which launched a campaign in this period to expand <br />home ownership- The, Minimal Traditional home served as the prototype used by the FHA in its efforts to codify and <br />manufacture "a standard, low-cost, minimum house that the majority of American wage earners could afford" (Greg Hise, <br />Magnetic Los. Angeles, p. 57). <br />In a reflection of the Tudor and English Revival styles they,mimie, Minimal Traditional homes aro typically rectangular in plan <br />and one-story in height, often with -a front -gabled wing and prominent attached chimney. In contrast with the preceding <br />styles, the Minimal Traditional home'is capped witha low or Intermediate pitch roof with a hipped or side gable. Sheathing <br />materials include stucco, brick, or wood, often accompanied by stone veneer accents. Fenestration generally consists of <br />multi -light casement, double -hung, and picture windows with wood frames. The eaves and rakes of the Minimal Traditional <br />home are typically shallow (in a departure from the later Ranch House style, which they often resemble). Although they have <br />little applied ornament, many Minimal Traditional homes display decorative wood shutters and porch -roof supports. By the <br />1950s, the Minimal Traditional home was replaced by the Ranch House as the style of choice for middle-class housing and <br />large tract -house developments. (McAlester, pp. 47648). <br />SUMMARYICONCLUSION: <br />The Molfetto House qualifies for listing in the Santa Ana Register of Historical Properties under Criterion 1, for its <br />exemplification of the distinguishing characteristics of the Minimal Traditional style, Additionally,,the house has been <br />categorized as "Contributive' because it "contributes to the overall character and history" of the Park Santiago neighborhood <br />and "is a good example of period architecture," representing the Minimal Traditional style in S.A.M.C. Section 30-2.2. <br />ATION OF CODES: <br />California Register Criteria for Evaluation.,(From'California Office of Historic Preservation; Technical Assistance <br />Bulletin # 7, September 4,72,001 _.) <br />3, It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or <br />represents'the'work of master, or possesses high artistic values. <br />California Historical Resource Status Code. (From California Office of Historic'Preservation Technical Assistance <br />Bulletin #8, November 2004). <br />2D Appears to be individually eligible for local designation through survev.evaluatlon. <br />EXHIBIT 2 <br />25A-67 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.