My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
13A - COUNCIL CMT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
13A - COUNCIL CMT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:29:28 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Clerk of the Council
Item #
13A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Irma Macias, shares her opposition to the ordinance and the activities that it pertains to. She feels <br />that the City can gain revenue in other ways. <br />Melahat Rafiei, from the Santa Ana Cannabis Association, inquires about the timeline in the <br />application process, and asks for more time to obtain operational status. She also asks Staff to <br />consider allowing volatile manufacturing. <br />Tamara Bogosian responds to the inquiry about operational status, stating that Staff is <br />considering that a business could be deemed operational when license is granted, for that <br />particular cannabis activity. Robert Cortez further clarifies that the intent is that the application <br />process would start when the ordinance gets its second reading, which would allow sufficient <br />time to approve licenses by January 2, 2018. <br />Chairman Solorio asks Melahat her opinion about whether or not she envisions retail businesses <br />wanting cultivation licenses, to which she suggests Jayson Quinones and Jason Lily provide a <br />response. <br />Jayson Quinones, President of Santa Ana Cannabis Association, states that it is dependent on the <br />size of the location, in determining cultivation. <br />Jason Lilly, of Kannabis Works, adds that 40 would be an ideal amount of distribution licenses, <br />stating that if 20 cultivation and 20 manufacturing licenses are granted, each would need to be <br />distributed. <br />Melahat Rafiei shares her opinion about taxation, stating that if too expensive, the potential for <br />black market activity increases, and asks that consideration be made for determining taxation. <br />Chad Wanke warns that if manufacturing licenses are limited and become maxed out, other cities <br />will potentially take advantage and in tum get the tax revenue. <br />ACTION: <br />Chairman Solorio: Asks Staff to provide more clarity on when applications are due, when <br />considering the timeline of operational status, and amend the labor agreement to apply to <br />businesses with two or more employees. Additionally, Chairman Solorio directs Staff to consider <br />permitting volatile manufacturing. <br />Committee Member Tinajero: Prior to the October 17, 2017 City Council meeting, Committee <br />Member Tinajero asks that research be conducted about volatile manufacturing and be proposed <br />to City Council for consideration. Additionally, Committee Member Tinajero suggests <br />consideration of increasing of the number of distribution licenses, to meet potential demand. <br />3 <br />13A-23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.