My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2017
>
12/05/2017
>
75A - PH BRISTOL ST MEMORY LN PROJECT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2017 5:34:02 PM
Creation date
11/30/2017 7:30:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
75A
Date
12/5/2017
Destruction Year
2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM <br />Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements - Project No. 17-6883 <br />MODIFIED INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST <br />Draft I November 2017 10 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist <br />75A-73 <br />New Impacts of Proposed <br />Previous FEISIEIR <br />Project Changes <br />• <br />No <br />Less Than <br />Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Impacts <br />Subsequent or <br />Impact <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Significant <br />Disclosed? <br />Supplemental EIR <br />Impact <br />After 1990 <br />Impact <br />Required? <br />Mitigation <br />b) Does the project include recreational <br />facilities or require the construction or <br />expansion of recreational facilities that <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />might have an adverse physical effect on <br />the environment? <br />16. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. <br />Would the project: <br />a) Conflict with an applicable plan, <br />ordinance or policy establishing measures <br />of effectiveness for the performance of the <br />circulation system, taking into account all <br />modes of transportation including mass <br />transit and non -motorized travel and <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />relevant components of the circulation <br />system, including but not limited to <br />intersections, streets, highways and <br />freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, <br />and mass transit? <br />b) Conflict with an applicable congestion <br />management program, including, but not <br />limited to level of service standards and <br />travel demand measures, or other <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />standards established by the county <br />congestion management agency for <br />designated roads or highways? <br />c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, <br />including either an increase in traffic levels <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />or a change in location that results in <br />substantial safety risks? <br />d) Substantially increase hazards due to a <br />— <br />--------- <br />----- <br />design feature (e.g., sharp curves or <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />dangerous intersections) or incompatible <br />uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />e) Result in inadequate emergency <br />------------ <br />X <br />-- - -- <br />YES <br />- <br />NO <br />access? <br />f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or <br />programs regarding public transit, bicycle, <br />or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise <br />X <br />YES <br />NO <br />decrease the performance or safety of <br />such facilities? <br />Draft I November 2017 10 Appendix A - Modified Initial Study Checklist <br />75A-73 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.