2017-077 - Approving an Addendum to the Final Environmental Imapact

Home Browse Search

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ADDENDUM Bristol Street and Memory Lane Intersection Improvements —Project No. 17-6883 u) A resource determined by the lead agency, is its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significad pursued to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteriasetforth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024. 1, the Lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. The Project is not subject to AB 52 and did not undergo the AB 52 Consultation Process. Notwithstanding the 1990 FEIS/EIR, no historical or archaeological resources were identified in the Project vicinity pertaining to Native American resources. Further, during public noticing periods, letters received from the Office of Historic Preservation indicated that the Bristol Widening Project would not affect historic properties. No correspondence from any tribes were received during the 1990 FEIS/EIR. No new impacts have been identified. Should any unknown tribal cultural resources be uncovered during grading/site disturbance activities, the Project would be required to comply with the 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measure T-1. Impacts in this regard would be less than significant Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: Refer to 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measure T-1. Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. 3.18 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS This section corresponds with the 1990 FEIS/EIR, Section IV, Environmental Consequences and Mitigation Aleasures, Subsection S, Effect on Utilities, and Subsection V, Construction Impacts. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater neabnent requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The proposed Project entails intersection improvements; such improvements would not result in the generation of wastewater. No new significant impact is anticipated. Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: No 1990 FEIS/EIR mitigation measures are applicable Mitigation Measures: No additional mitigation measures are required. Z) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treabmentfaeaifiies or expansion of existingfaefiities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The proposed Project would not require or result in the constmetion of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. No new significant impact is anticipated. Implementation of 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures V-14 and V-17 would reduce impacts to less than significant Impacts would not be greater than that previously analyzed in the 1990 FEIS/EIR. Certified 1990 FEIS/EIR Mitigation Measures: V-14 Project plans and construction activities will be closely coordinated with local utility purveyors in order to make the necessary arrangements for the relocation of facilities and avoid or minimize any disruption to service. It is also recommended that the utilities provide adequate notice to its customers of any service disruptions. V-17 The City of Santa Ana's Public Works Director will coordinate closely with all agencies and companies which maintain underground or at -grade utility or energy facilities within the areas to be disturbed by project construction activities. Preliminary and final design plans will be made available to such agencies for review and comment At least 48 hours prior to commencement of any excavation activities, the City will contact the Underground Service Alert to notify the affected utility/energy purveyors who can place their personnel at the excavation site to assist in the location of underground Final I December 2017 3-28 Environmental Consequences