My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
32A - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBDIVIDE
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
01/16/2018
>
32A - TENTATIVE TRACT MAP SUBDIVIDE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 7:12:36 PM
Creation date
1/11/2018 6:50:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
32A
Date
1/16/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not cause <br />serious public health problems. <br />The design or improvements of the proposed project will not <br />cause serious health problems, with the proposed subdivision <br />not having any detrimental effects upon the general public. <br />The property will include necessary utilities and infrastructure <br />improvements as required under Development Project <br />Review No. 2017-05. <br />6. The design or improvements of the proposed project will not conflict <br />with easements necessary for public access through or use of the <br />property within the proposed project. <br />The design or improvements of the proposed project will not <br />conflict with easements necessary for public access or use <br />of the property within the proposed project since there are no <br />existing and recorded easements for the property. The <br />conceptual design of all construction for the property will not <br />affect the proposed access easement. The Applicant will be <br />recording an easement necessary to ensure reciprocal rights <br />between properties, including but not limited to access, <br />egress, common areas, and drainage. <br />Section 2. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act <br />(CEQA), the recommendation is exempt from further review pursuant to Section 15332 <br />(Class 32 "In -Fill Development Projects'). Class 32 exemption applies to projects <br />characterized as infill development meeting the following conditions: 1. The project is <br />consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan <br />policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulation; 2. The proposed <br />development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres <br />substantially surrounded by urban uses; 3. The project site has no value as habitat for <br />endangered, rare or threatened species; 4. Approval of the project would not result in <br />any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and 5. The <br />site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. <br />The project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the R-2 development <br />standards. The project meets several General Plan goals and policies, including the <br />Land Use Element's Goal 1 (to promote a balance of land uses to address basic <br />community needs), Goal 2 (to promote land uses which enhance the City's economic <br />and fiscal viability), and Goal 3 (to preserve and improve the character and integrity of <br />neighborhoods). <br />Further, the proposed project will take place within city limits and is on a project <br />site that is less than five acres in size and is surrounded by urban areas. The project <br />site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species and is not <br />identified in the General Plan as having such value. Approval of the project will not <br />Resolution No. 2017-45 <br />Page 5 of 9 <br />32A-13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.