Laserfiche WebLink
GUpwbr CCA of MCH m <br />A; ronNV On PARTY WnT(OVTXTronNayrreMq,#ewb mt4, a+W-dpw: ow,vrmoruae <br />avid K. 'Tran, Esq. <br />Law Of:tices of David R. ',Gran er n+�+�wrwoaoaaar cwx <br />15446 Brookhurst Street <br />Westminster, CA 92683 <br />T9LvHwuod (714) 839.4477 FAxNatCpL'oris+v, (714) 839-4078 <br />gWtLI'Dcal davidtranudktran.com <br />ATTOnNsv Foo rA'>ro'+9r N oc T. Do alta Bich -N oc Thi po; Lcrtus <br />SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Orange <br />sraesrAansecaa700 Ci'v'ic Center Drive West <br />"WrIaADDR&es nu' ame as above <br />orrvavazpcooeSanta Ana, CA 92.701 <br />Ngpc T. no aka Bich -N900 Thi DOI LOWS COnsUktanta, LLC <br />JUD-100 <br />FILED <br />SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA <br />C CENTRALJU6'IC <br />TTCKGENTER <br />AUG 19 2895 <br />JUDGMENT oAse tvcixtssa: <br />® By Clerk M By Default After Court Trial 30.2(714 007531$6•CV•Fit•CJC <br />!� By court [--3 On Stipulation Defendant Did Not <br />Appear at Trial <br />JUDGMENT <br />SY DEFAULT <br />& Defendant was properly served with a copy of the summons and complaint, <br />e. Defendant fatted to answer the complaint at appear and defend the action within the aims allowed bylaw, <br />c, Defendant's default was entered by the olork upon plaintiffs application. <br />d, ® Clerk's Judgment (Code ON. Proo„ § 685(a)). Defendant was sued only on a contract or Judgment of a court of <br />this state for the recovery of money, <br />e. CO Court Judgment (Code Civ. Prow, § 585(b)). The court considered <br />(1) ® plalntfffs testimony and other evidence. <br />(2) M) Plaintiffs written declaration (Cade ON, Proo„ §,586(d)). <br />2. Z3 ONS71PULATION <br />a. Plaintiff and defendant agreed (stipulated) that a judgment be entered In this case. The court approved the stipulated <br />judgment and <br />b. El the signed written stipulation was filed In the case. <br />D. (-1 the stipulation wee stated in open oourt jLj the stipulation was stated on the r000rd. <br />3. (La AFTER COURT TRIAL. Tne jury was waived. The court considered the evidence. <br />a. Tho case was triad on (date and Hme); _ <br />before (name of judiotal officer): <br />b. Appearances by: <br />Cj Piall (name each): ZI Plaintiffs attorney (nanra each): <br />(2I (2) <br />Continued on Attachment 36, <br />(= Defendant (name agoh); 71 Defendant's allomay (Warns each) <br />(t) (t) <br />(2) (2) <br />[l Continued on Attachment ab, <br />9. E-1 Defendant did not appear at filet. Defendant was property served with notice of trial, <br />d. E] A statement of deolslon (Cade Cly. Proc., § 632) �-,j was not ® was requested. <br />+*sea t of 2 <br />ramJ rwotl mr ocN Use JUDGMENT raa NPw Pro ailuro, gy 605, G64.e <br />duotw{ °J�� y1. RW�1 <br />kmnmfMM!r _ . Ngoc T. bo aka Dich•Ngoo rent ik, <br />�a �s if18M3" <br />