|
❑_ 7`he tCity,Council has reviewed,applicable general plan, policies and -h'as
<br />deterriirn1 d ;that this proposed _rezoning, is consistent with the puipose -of.
<br />,th' :General Plan',.
<br />'E,. The City Council-;pnor to,taking' acGon_on'thls ordinance, held:.a dUty,rloticed
<br />public:heaflpg on Febir�ary.F>','2018;
<br />F_ -The,dity Councjl also adepts 601riding011 facts piesented fn the Request
<br />for.Cquncil Action dated February.6 20'18 accompanying
<br />-this . ,niatter:,
<br />C.. For thds''eF reasons;, Amendment'Appllcation No .2017 02, is ,heteby,fouhO
<br />and; deterrnined to be conslstant.with theji0tent grid purpose of Chapter 41
<br />of ttie. Santa Ana Municipal Code thus., changing the. -ming district is
<br />found 'to'b0 consistent,with the. General .Plan of the City of ,Santa. Aha 'and
<br />otheitirise justified by ,the, public necessity, convenienoe;, and general
<br />3ecu6n2. The Pianhing'Corn missioh'of the. gi(y,. Santa,Anasredommends that
<br />1,Couricil adopt Mitigated Negafive D6rlarabodi'En`vironmental ReView.No.'2017=
<br />adopt'an'grdinance rezoning. the real propertyllocated 6i-211.5,'2123'artd 21.29.'
<br />Aain Street -from Professional (P,) to Community,'Commercial Museum District (C1-
<br />his;recommendatton:is based upon fhe evidence sUbniitted at the''above said
<br />-which l?cludes;'.but is.,riot limited -,to; the';Request'forCouncillAcGon dated'
<br />ry.s 2018,-bqd'exhibits attached thereto and ,the(public testimony, written and'
<br />I of -which are, incoSpoialed-henan by this reference.
<br />Section 3,. The _City Council has reviewed and considered" .the, info,rmatlon�
<br />,ontained rn ' .the initial study. 'and the mitigated negative declaratr?n,
<br />pN,b)ttnelronriient4FReview No.,2017'-96, prepared With respect to this pro)gct. The.
<br />City Council (ias,:as a'result of its, consideration and'the e ,dence,,preser ted atthe
<br />hearings -an this ;rnatter, deterrrmined' .that; as required. pursuant;to.California
<br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)'al d'the.State CEQA Guidelinest a MND adequately
<br />addresses the ,expected' environmental :Impacts..of •this prajec;t Orr the basis of this
<br />rewew, �ffe City'Council .finds that with ,the .ir pOem'entatian:qf the Mitigation Monitoring
<br />and Repoiting ,P ograrri there Is no evtdence from which it can be falrly>argued that the,
<br />prolect'wili have a significant adverse effect on the environment `The City ;Council
<br />hereby•certifres'and approves.the MND and directs that the Notice bf'Deteimination be
<br />prepared and filed 'with the County' Clerk of the 'County;of' Orange In .the. manner
<br />r eoui f dd Eby faw.
<br />Pursuant'to'Title XIV,-Caifomia Code of Regulations (CCR)+§", 355(c)(17, the
<br />City Council has jetermined tiiat, after.consldeiigg the record,'as a whole, there is no
<br />evidence that the proposed. Project will have the ;pofentlal 'W,any significant adverse,
<br />effOc ,'6n ,wildlifec•:resources or the ecological habitat upon which wiidlife ,resources'
<br />depend,: The proposed Project exists in an urban enviroTament.characterized by paved.
<br />concrete,. roadways, surrounding buildings .and hurnan.acflvity However; pursuant to
<br />Fish ,and .(5,ame Godes§ 711.2 -and Title XIV, CCR,•§, 7,, 5, the, payrrient'of Fish and
<br />Qrdhance No..NS-,)(XXX
<br />Page 2 of 5
<br />75A-18
<br />
|