Laserfiche WebLink
IMPACTS TO CITY BUDGET <br />H <br />(ALL FUNDS) <br />-- Average annual ....I Se'EM <br />1 increase of 137 %over : $MM .n to:ea <br />°6aon I ,the neM five Yeats SLIM <br />g [ree:n 575.1M <br />poo <br />$sno <br />Sso 0 <br />Eno a <br />Sao 0 <br />Sza o <br />9w.o <br />FvzuaE nuaz Pvzz.za J <br />Pme[1ad ProeRatl pre�aRotl <br />®•enenl Fund <br />amnloyer <br />ContrlLuOon <br />23 <br />LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PENSION STUDY <br />• Local agencies comprise approximately 40 percent of all CalPERS <br />members. <br />• Local Leaders, comprising of mayors, council members, city managers <br />and finance officers shared their own cities' stories and concerns <br />during meetings in September & November 2017. <br />• The message delivered was: the "employer just paying more" option is <br />no longer viable. <br />• Following these meetings where local leaders gave voice to the <br />challenges they face delivering services as pension costs increase, the <br />League decided to commission this study. <br />• Key Findings: <br />1. Rising pension costs will require cities over the next seven years to <br />nearly double the percentage of their General Fund dollars they pay <br />to CaIPERS; <br />2. For many cities, pension costs will dramatically increase to <br />unsustainable levels; and <br />3. The impacts of increasing pension costs as a percentage of <br />General Fund spending will affect cities even more than the state. <br />Employee costs, including police, fire and other municipal services, <br />are a larger proportion of spending for cities <br />STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS RISING PENSION COSTS <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10A 88 FEBRUARY 5, 2018 <br />9e.sm <br />r�<reae® <br />mnrense <br />"' <br />6of8M <br />�2.3M <br />4S.1M <br />FV1Jw <br />Nww <br />R']PEd <br />ERlme<ud <br />PmJeRetl <br />Pioetred <br />I Mm U-1 <br />Fund <br />FvzuaE nuaz Pvzz.za J <br />Pme[1ad ProeRatl pre�aRotl <br />®•enenl Fund <br />amnloyer <br />ContrlLuOon <br />23 <br />LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PENSION STUDY <br />• Local agencies comprise approximately 40 percent of all CalPERS <br />members. <br />• Local Leaders, comprising of mayors, council members, city managers <br />and finance officers shared their own cities' stories and concerns <br />during meetings in September & November 2017. <br />• The message delivered was: the "employer just paying more" option is <br />no longer viable. <br />• Following these meetings where local leaders gave voice to the <br />challenges they face delivering services as pension costs increase, the <br />League decided to commission this study. <br />• Key Findings: <br />1. Rising pension costs will require cities over the next seven years to <br />nearly double the percentage of their General Fund dollars they pay <br />to CaIPERS; <br />2. For many cities, pension costs will dramatically increase to <br />unsustainable levels; and <br />3. The impacts of increasing pension costs as a percentage of <br />General Fund spending will affect cities even more than the state. <br />Employee costs, including police, fire and other municipal services, <br />are a larger proportion of spending for cities <br />STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS RISING PENSION COSTS <br />CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 10A 88 FEBRUARY 5, 2018 <br />