My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
75A - PH ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
03/20/2018
>
75A - PH ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2018 8:41:56 AM
Creation date
3/16/2018 8:27:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Planning & Building
Item #
75A
Date
3/20/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. There was continued concerns from residents on the short time frame for public input. <br />Staff response: "We heard your concerns in many previous meetings." <br />Note: To my personal knowledge there were only two neighborhood meetings (other than Com -Link) where GF was <br />addressed —and staff could name only one such meeting. <br />There were one or two Council subcommittee meetings at which GF was discussed. <br />Further staff response: "We are willing to do that again" and "We will use Neighborhood Improvement to reach <br />out to you." <br />"If we have a need to get additional input we will take that time." <br />Note: Staff did not make a commitment for additional public meetings concerning Granny Flats before it would go to <br />Planning Commission and Council. <br />S. Further Staff response: "We heard what you said you talked about how these units Impacted your <br />neighborhoods." <br />"We are working with our City Attorney's office — we want to get it fight." <br />"We heard your direction In terms of regulating units so that they are safe and that they don't impact our <br />neighborhoods." <br />"And to be honest I am hoping that we have some open communication. I'm hoping that we can really talk'about <br />this because we have limitations on what we can do as a community." <br />6. "Will there be further community meetings (on GF)." <br />Staff response: "We will If we are requested to do so." <br />Worth noting again <br />1. In the previous 13 years the City has approved a total of 40 GF <br />2. The City has received 29 applications since Jan.'V of this Year <br />Note: Staff did not make a commitment for additional public meetings concerning Granny Flats before it would go to <br />Planning Commission and Council. <br />Important note -The State "mandated" law has "wiggle room" built into it— it can be adjusted to fit the needs of <br />Santa Ana's neighborhoods -otherwise we would not be talking about it now. <br />Thank you, <br />Mike Tardif <br />75A-33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.