My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 85A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
03/30/2018_Special
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 85A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2022 10:46:17 AM
Creation date
3/29/2018 12:08:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
It is not that Santa Ana should not have homeless folks. As long as other do, Santa Ana should and <br />we need to have some financial, social, and shelter skin in the game. The problem is the <br />concentration of the homeless population. The concentration is creating problems. Other cities are <br />transporting their homeless to Santa Ana not only to remove them from their own city, but also <br />because that is where the services are available and there may be an available bed. <br />We need to spread the concentration out and each community in Orange County can share in the <br />load. Maybe a story can help understand the concentration issues. There are 2 people each with <br />one gallon of water. One has 18 parts per billion of lead concentrate. If you drink that water, it will <br />be poisonous. The other person's gallon of water is pristine and only has 2 parts per billion of lead in <br />it. You drink that water and you have some of the best water around. If you combine the two, you <br />will have 2 gallons of water each with 10 parts per billion of lead concentrate- below the 15 parts <br />per billion acceptable level. It is only right, humane, and ethical for the person with the clean gallon <br />to dilute their water with the other so that both parties have clean drinking water. if the person who <br />has the clean water refuses to allow for the dilution, leadership has to step In and make it safe for <br />everyone. <br />There are alternatives throughout the county but no one is going to like them. The easy thing to do <br />is to keep this a Santa Ana issue. The right thing to do is for everyone to share the load, <br />Irvine 300-acre Site Community Response <br />As we know, the three sites that were previously identified as shelter areas is now on hold. We are <br />all accutely aware of the show of power that the residents of Irvine expressed. The Irvine folks did e <br />great job of showing that a solid force is one that can yield great results. There main concerns were <br />safety, proximity to schools, location next to a park, and distance to residential as well as no <br />services at the location, inappropriateness of a tent city, and possible contamination of the land as <br />well as others. I Intend to address each of these as I would expect that each of you would do also <br />especially with an eye towards the current situation in Santa Ana as it relates to decisions that have <br />been made with the Couryard and the Plaza of the Flags area. <br />Fortunately, I feel that based on what I have heard from the Irvine group, that given facts and <br />communication that they want to help. However, their help cannot be limited to providing food, <br />clothing, toys and other niceties. They must also shoulder part of the emergency shelter that the <br />homeless so urgently need. By providing the emergency housing, it will allow us to transition them <br />into temporary housing with supportive services which will lead to permanent supportive housing. <br />Safety Issues <br />If housing the homeless population in Irvine, Laguna Niguel or any other city is deemed to be a <br />safety concern, what are we saying about the Courtyard and the Plaza of the Flags area? If the <br />Courtyard and Plaza of the Flags homeless areas are safe for the families of Santa Ana, then housing <br />them in Irvine, Laguna Niguel, or other parts of the county should be similarly safe. If however, we <br />are saying that the homeless population is not safe, we are then indicating that it is acceptable to <br />leadership that we put the people of Santa Ana at a safety risk- one that they are not willing to have <br />in other areas. <br />3 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.