CORRESPONDENCE - 85A - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

and women but should also include men who also want help. Secondly, there is still a tremendous need for immediate emergency housing which this will not do anything to alleviate. The Alton site may be appropriate for permanent supportive housing but in the meantime, a temporary emergency shelter should be established at the appropriately zoned 100-acre site in Irvine as well as other sites throughout the county. The Alton project will take 2 to 3 years to come on line I believe. It is not solving the immediate problem. It is part of the next step. This site may be a great addition, but does not mean that Irvine cannot participate in the Fairview Developmental Center The residents of Costa Mesa saw the effectiveness of the Irvine residents in throwing their power around and Costa Mesa will likely follow the same plan. Costa Mesa will, and already has, come up with all types of reasons that the Fairview Developmental Center is not appropriate. Costa Mesa has a homeless problem also. Fairview can be part of the solution not only for the local Costa Mesa homeless but other homeless throughout the county. However, given the zoning and other barriers, which in time can be overcome, Fairview is likely more valuable as part of the longer term solution. In the meantime, we still have to address the more immediate need of immediate housing and shelter. There obviously is a fair amount of open space at that facility also which should be considered for temporary shelter also. I urge you to work with the State of California with the necessary requirements in allowing the center to be used for homeless housing. We need to explore multiple options but we should not allow one seemingly potential option, Fairview, to derail another immediately available option in the 100-acre Irvine site. We need to proceed with both options, the newly proposed Alton site in Irvine, and also the other sites that hopefully other cities will come to the table with. Conclusion The residents of Santa Ana have been more than generous in not only providing for the homeless but also in our compassion towards them. Santa Ana has supported the Courtyard Shelter, Mercy House and other housing for those who are most vulnerable. Santa Ana has been thrust into caring for the unhoused for far too long and the residents of Santa Ana deserve as much respect as those who live in other parts of the County. By spreading emergency shelter housing throughout the county, we will see that no one area is carrying an extraordinary burden but a manageable one. In turn, it will allow leadership to provide for a strategy that can be implemented to not only provide housing but also to transition the homeless back into jobs. It is not appropriate to expect that Santa Ana, Anaheim and a few select other cities to carry the load that we have been carrying for many years now. The residents of Santa Ana should be provided the same consideration as to location of shelters as any other city in the County. If the location of the Santa Ana shelter is appropriate for its residents, it certainly can be acceptable in almost any other location throughout the county if the land is available. If the residents are going to be treated differently than residents in other parts of the community, then there will be legal issues. 81Fage