My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
04/03/2018
>
CORRESPONDENCE - 75A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2018 1:04:11 PM
Creation date
4/3/2018 1:02:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Item #
75A
Date
4/3/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cox, Castle Nicholson LLP <br />COX CASTLE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />078850 <br />April 2, 2018 <br />Via E-mail (larabe@santa-ana.org; eComment@santa-ana.org) <br />Mayor Pulido and Members of the City Council <br />City of Santa Ana <br />20 Civic Center Plaza <br />Santa Ana, CA 92701 <br />Dear Mayor Pulido and Members of the City Council: <br />This letter is written on behalf of the owner of the Xerox office building at 1851 East First Street <br />(the "Xerox Building') with respect to the application for approval of The Madison. Last <br />November, we presented our concerns to the Planning Commission. Since that time, our <br />concerns have grown, as set forth below. <br />Initially, we would like to emphasize that the owner of the Xerox Building does not object to the <br />uses proposed by the project. To the contrary, we welcome them. Our principal concerns relate <br />to internal circulation resulting in morning peak hour cross traffic impacts that have not been <br />evaluated (including their potential impacts on queuing on Cabrillo Park Drive), the requested <br />parking variance, the location of the loading zone, and the absence of a designated move -in / <br />move -out loading area. These issues need not stand in the way of the project, but should be <br />addressed before the project is approved. <br />Before addressing the CEQA issue, a solution which we proposed to Mr. Bisno and which Mr. <br />Bisno appeared to embrace is to have the Madison parking structure entrance off of Xerox <br />Centre, with the exit on State Fund Drive. By doing so, significant cross -traffic conflicts could be <br />avoided on Xerox Centre Drive and not created on State Fund Drive because (i) the peak hour <br />for Madison entries would coincide with departures from the Xerox building and (ii) the peak <br />hour for Madison departures would coincide with arrivals at the State Fund building. <br />Discussions were initiated with the firm that manages the State Fund building to obtain <br />permission to use State Fund for exiting from the Madison parking structure. Those discussions, <br />however, were not completed and additional time is required for negotiations. It is not our <br />intent to stand in the way of the project, but our concerns need to be addressed. For that <br />www.coxcastle.com Los Angeles I Orange County I San Francisco <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.