Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVENT PROJECT EXPERIENCE <br />LIST OF CALIFORNIA AGENCY CLIENTS <br />The following lists are representative samples of our California based studies that our proposed project <br />team has completed (cost allocation plans, Indirect cost rate development, full cost rate studies, etc.) <br />While our experience Is so varied and includes local governments in nearly 20 states, our focus for this <br />proposal is on agencies of comparable size to Santa Ana and neighboring cities in Orange County. A <br />complete, unabridged client list is available upon request. <br />Los Angeles <br />Bakersfield <br />City of Orange <br />San Diego. <br />Riverside <br />NewporttBeach <br />San Jose <br />Stockton <br />Los Alamitos <br />LSan Francisco. <br />Chula Vista, ', <br />Irvine <br />Fresno Fremont Huntington Beach <br />Long Beach twine -Garden Grove --- <br />Sacramento <br />San Bernardino <br />La Habra <br />Oakland: —� <br />Mode"sfo T <br />_ gana'Point i w� <br />Santa Ana <br />Oxnard <br />Costa Mesa <br />Anaheim <br />Fontana <br />V Orange County <br />EXPERIENCE WITH SIMILAR PROJECTS <br />As mentioned earlier, the MGT project team has experience with each of the largest 20 city governments <br />in the state. In addition, most of the Orange County cities have also been clients. <br />The work done for these clients includes: <br />• Cost Allocation Plans (citywide, countywide, and department -specific) <br />• Indirect Cost Rate Proposals (ICRP's) <br />• Development of Fully Burdened Hourly Rates <br />• User Fee/Cost-of-Service Studies <br />It is fair to say that our project team is among the most experienced in the country. The combination of <br />the experience gained specifically with Santa Ana Public Works, and generally with other large agency <br />clients, makes MGT uniquely qualified to successfully complete this project. <br />®�® <br />MGT CITY OF SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA I MARCH 8, 2018 1 I <br />Av�®Ao7!NG GROUP RFP NO. 18-02311 PROPOSAL FOR COST ALLOCATION PLAN / ISF ALLOCATION STUDY ll' <br />! PAGE <br />25A-57 <br />