My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
25A - AGMT COST ALLOCATION PLAN
Clerk
>
Agenda Packets / Staff Reports
>
City Council (2004 - Present)
>
2018
>
05/01/2018
>
25A - AGMT COST ALLOCATION PLAN
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 6:46:33 PM
Creation date
4/26/2018 6:40:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Clerk
Doc Type
Agenda Packet
Agency
Public Works
Item #
25A
Date
5/1/2018
Destruction Year
2023
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M <br />I. INTRODUCTION / PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br />Nature of Work: <br />The City of Santa Ana is requesting sealed proposals for a Full Cost Allocation Plan for <br />Engineering Services and/or an Internal Service Fund Allocation Study for Public Works <br />Administrative Services. Proposers may respond to one of both of the aforementioned <br />projects. A detailed Scope of Work is included in the Appendix of this RFP as Attachment <br />1. <br />Number ofPr000sals and Signature: <br />Five (5) hard copies and one (1) digital file on labeled USB Flash Drive (or equivalent). One <br />of the hard copies shall be marked as "ORIGINAL' and shall be signed by a company <br />official with the power to bind the company and submitted to the City of Santa Ana. One (1) <br />copy of your Fee Proposal shall be submitted. <br />The Statement of Qualifications shall be limited to a maximum of (10) double -sided pages <br />(excluding front and back covers, section dividers and attachments such as resumes, forms). <br />Font size shall be minimum 11 -point Arial. Proposal exhibits shall be maximum 11" x 17". <br />ronosal Evaluation and Rating: <br />The criteria for evaluating the proposals submitted will take the following items into <br />consideration: <br />• Firm/Team Experience 20% <br />• Understanding of Need 25% <br />• Relevant Project Experience 25% <br />• Schedule 20% <br />• Cost Proposal 10% <br />The City has established a proposal review committee to evaluate proposers based on the <br />response to the RFP, which includes adherence to outlined directions and format, and the <br />City evaluation criteria set forth above. A final score will be calculated for each submitted <br />proposal and used to rank the proposers. <br />City of Santa Ana RFP 18-023 <br />P2SA-8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.