2018-04-17 Regular - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

on how to prevent this from happening again, such as sanctions that may be imposed or referral to FPPC. Councilmember Villegas, opined that Mayor may have believed vote was illegal and did not sign resolution; also question of Brown Act violations. Councilmember Tinajero, noted City Council took a vote that was approved by a majority of the City Council; opined although Mayor did not agree with it he had responsibility to sign and take appropriate legal action after; democracy blocked. Councilmember Solorio, echoed statements made by colleagues; noted traditionally not supportive of going down this route but believes in California Voting Rights Act, and importance of law; noted that communities that are implementing this have been doing it in a way that has enfranchised and involved more communities in the voting process, need to research when demographer report can be released, City of Santa Ana was acting responsibly, and need to not divide neighborhoods. Expressed support for item. Mayor Pro Tem Martinez, noted at first was not supportive because it was very rushed, Mayor Pulido has a responsibility to sign documents, Mayor violated the charter and duties, and implored Mayor to fulfill his duties in the future. Noted will only support district election unless all 19 different methods are researched, need to amend Charter to address residency requirements, hiring of a company like ESRI who will be open and transparent, and need to implement policy that funds cannot be used at their beckon call. Asked City Attorney is it typicall to perform boundary changes before census. Mayor Pro Tem Martinez left the meeting at 10:08 p.m. and did not return. City Attorney Carvalho, noted charter requires review boundaries after a census occurs, is not aware of historical actions, and review has been performed every ten years. Councilmember Benavides, thanked everyone for their comments. Noted similar discussion on district elections occurred, Council voted to place district election on ballot in June, and certain members of the community are being disenfranchised. Opined judge gave an order to the Mayor, clearly communicated to Mayor he violated ministerial duties, abandoned his responsibilities, and turned his back on the community. Asked staff to clarify process in considering ward boundaries, implications and options to address the Mayor's refusal to sign resolutions, and if moving to district elections would reset term limits. Clerk of the Council Huizar, noted election code requires five public hearings, four are required under the election code and one under the charter, pre - drawing of maps to obtain the elements of what the community wants, demographer would need to consider community interests before drafting maps. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 18 APRIL 17, 2018