HomeMy WebLinkAbout75A - PH WARD RE-BOUNDARIES #2REQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
SEPTEMBER 18, 2018
TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: HOLD SECOND
HEARING REGARDING THE PROPOSED
WARD RE -BOUNDARIES
(STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 1)
CIN MANAGER
RECOMMENDED ACTIONS
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
•r• _•
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on 161 Reading
❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Open and Close the second Public Hearing that will explain the re -boundary process, review the
criteria used to modify Ward boundaries, and allow residents to submit their ideas. for potential
"communities of interest" to consider in the new boundaries.
DISCUSSION
At its September 4, 2018 meeting, the City Council held the first public hearing regarding Ward
boundaries. The culmination of these two Hearings will result in the development of any
additional proposed new Ward map(s) for consideration at the subsequent Hearings scheduled
on October 16, 2018.
At the conclusion of the next Public Hearing to be held on October 16, 2018, the City Council will
have the ability to select the preferred Ward Map and introduce for first reading an ordinance
adjusting the ward boundaries in accordance with that map at the October 30, 2018 Adjourned
Regular Meeting of the City Council (see Exhibits 2 and 3).
The fifth and final Hearing scheduled for November 20, 2018 will be for the City Council to
consider second reading and final adoption of ordinance setting new Ward boundaries. A
timeline of events is attached as referenced in Exhibit 1.
The City Charter provides that an ordinance adjusting ward boundaries must be approved by a
2/3 affirmative vote requirement and be adopted no later than 120 days before an election in
order to be effective for that election (see Exhibit 4).
While the City Charter limits ward boundary adjustments as needed to ensure equality of
population among the wards, the settlement agreement approved by the City Council recognized
the need to do so in order to comply with the California Voting Rights Act, which applies to both
general law and charter cities.
75A-1
Second Public Hearing regarding Ward Re -Boundary
September 18, 2018
Page 2
Re -boundary Standards
When deciding upon a proposed map, the City Council must keep in mind certain standards in
order to comply with the law. The following are mandatory for any proposed map (see Exhibit 5):
• The Wards must be as nearly equal in population as may be (Elections Code § 21601).
Exact equality of population is not required for the Wards, but they should strive to create
Wards that have a total population deviation of no more than 10% between their most
heavily populated Ward and the least populated Wards. Gaffney v. Cummings, 412 U.S.
772 (1973).
• Current Councilmembers shall not lose their current seat or allow a term limit reset for
members that have served three consecutive terms of four -years each.
The City Council may also rely upon the following "traditional" re -boundary factors when deciding
upon a map pursuant to Election Code §21601:
• Cohesiveness, continuity, integrity, and compactness of territory
• Community of interest
• Topography and geography
Finally, the following are additional criteria which are also acceptable to consider:
• Traditional boundaries
• Preservation of core of prior Wards
• Race may be a factor considered in establishing the districts, but it may not be the
predominant motivating factor in creating the districts. Miller v. Johnson, 515 U. S. 900,
916 (1995). Race is a predominant factor if the legislature "subordinate[s]" other factors—
compactness, respect for political subdivisions, partisan advantage, what have you—to
"racial considerations." Id.
The City has held four Community Meetings throughout the City and received input including the
need for additional demographic data. The demographic data in Exhibit 6 includes both total
population (based on the 2010 census) and the Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP) (based on
the American Community Survey of the US Census). It must be noted that only total population
will be used to determine the size or composition of Wards (refer to Exhibit 6).
Staff has made the following efforts to encourages the community to be engaged in the process -
notices sent via Nixie Alert, Facebook posting, emailed notice to all neighborhood associations,
school district, board and commission members, and religious institutions; also published legal
notices in various newspapers and translated into Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese and Korean.
The information has also been posted on the City's website located at hftp://www.ci.santa-
ana.ca.us/coc/ward-re-boundary.asp
75A-2
Second Public Hearing regarding Ward Re -Boundary
September 18, 2018
Page 3
Anyone may submit a comment or provide "community of interest' for consideration in the
development of new Ward boundaries. A web -based platform is available to submit a
"Community of Interest" and located at: https://santa-
ana maps arcgis com/apps/CrowdsourceReporter/index htmPap pid=76c69f1d041842cd9c9eecd
7de9f05df All maps, suggestions and comments will be carefully reviewed and considered.
Please submit on or before October 4, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. to ensure adequate review time to
Santa Ana City Hall, Clerk of the Council, 20 Civic Center Plaza 8th Floor, Santa Ana, CA 92701
or via e-mail at ecomments()santa-ana.org.
This proposed re -boundary process is categorically exempt from the California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Section 15320 — Class 20 (Changes in Organization of Local
Agencies) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, since it
involves a proposed reorganization of the City Council Wards and does not change the
geographical area in which previously existing powers are exercised.
STRATEGIC PLAN
Approval of this item allows us to meet Goal #5. Community Health, Livability, Engagement &
Sustainability, Priority #1, Establish a comprehensive community engagement initiative exhibit to
expand access to information and create opportunities for stakeholders to play an active role in
discussing public policy and setting priorities.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact associated with this action.
Maria D. Huizar
Clerk of the Council
Exhibits:
1. Timeline: Ward Re -Boundary Process
2. Current Ward Boundary Map
3. Proposed Draft Maps A -D
4. City of Santa Ana Charter Provisions
5. Elections Code Provisions
6. Additional Demographic Data
75A-3
75A-4
EXHIBIT 1:
TIMELINE OF EVENTS
WARD -RE -BOUNDARY PROCESS
75A-5
DESCRIPTIONDATE OF ACTION
Published Notice of Community Meetings and Public Hearings in
English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Chinese and Korean.
August 27
Notices sent to religious organizations, Neighborhood Associations,
a City Press Release and website developed with information
COMMUNITY MEETING #1 - Thursday, August 30, 2018 at 10
August 30
a.m. at Iglesia De Dios Pentecostal, 1025 W. Memory Lane, Santa
Ana, CA
September 4
PUBLIC HEARING #1 — City Council Meeting
COMMUNITY MEETING #2 - Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 6
September 6
p.m. at Southwest Senior Center, 2201 W. McFadden Ave., Santa
Ana, CA
COMMUNITY MEETING #3 - Monday, September 10, 2018 at 6
September 10
p.m. at Delhi Community Center, 505 E. Central Ave, Santa Ana,
CA
COMMUNITY MEETING #4 - Saturday, September 15, 2018 at 10
September 15
a.m. at Salgado Recreation Center 706 N. Newhope St., Santa Ana,
CA
September 18
PUBLIC HEARING #2 - City Council Meeting. (Pre -Map Formation)
Publish Public Hearing Notice MUST be published at least 7 days
September 19
before Hearing. (To be published on ??? for Hearings on October
16 and October 30th)
PUBLIC HEARING #3 — (Map Development Session)
• Review Proposed Maps as published. If any changes, will need to
October 16
republish (NOTE: requires 7 days of publication prior to Hearing
and adoption)
• Adjourn Hearing #3 to Hearing #4 for further consideration.
PUBLIC HEARING #4 — Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 5:45 p.m.
(Map Development Session Cont.)
• Review Proposed Maps as published and considered at previous
October 30
Meeting. If any changes, will need to republish (NOTE: requires 7
days of publication prior to Hearing and adoption)
• Approve first reading of Ordinance and authorize publication of
Ordinance (Requires five affirmative votes.)
75A-5
October 31
Send Publication of Ordinance, including map(s) with new Ward
boundary lines to OC Register for publication
November 20
PUBLIC HEARING #5 - Adoption (2nd reading) of Ordinance
establishing New Ward Boundaries.
Effective Date of Ordinance establishing New Boundary Wards
(MUST be adopted before 120 days pursuant to Charter and 125
days per AB1730).
75A-6
EXHIBIT 2:
CURRENT WARD BOUNDARIES
0.0 OS 1.0 1.5
Miles
City of Santa Ana
Council Wards
Adopted January 17, 2012
75A-7
11
75A-8
EXHIBIT 3:
PROPOSED WARD MAPS
PLANS A -D
City of Santa Ana
Plan A
0
PLANA
A
B
C
D
E
F
Population
54,539
54,399
53,751
53,680
54,038
54,176
Deviation
441
301
(347)
418)
(60)
78
196
196
-1%
-1%
096
096
18• Citizens (CVAP)
27,031
20,808
27,179
25,585
17,295
22,526
5096
3896
5196
4896
3296
4296
Latino NAP
11,893
15,300
13,168
14,900
14,170
14,636
4496
7496
48%
5896
8296
6596
White CVAP
2,915
2,345
20,335
5,373
1,807
4,622
1196
1196
3896
2196
10%
2196
Afriun American CVAP
263
444
394
748
93
616
196
296
196
396
196
396
Asian CVAP
11,494
2,525
2,776
4,267
995
2,317
43%
1196
10%
1796
696
10%
75A-9
City of Santa Ana
Plan B
O
u I_ A
PIAN B A
B
C
D
E
F
Population
53,864
54,497
54,367
53,794
54,269
53,792
Deviation
(234)
399
269
(304)
171
(306)
096
196
096
-196
096
-196
18t Citizens (CVAP)
27,760
26,316
26,160
22,589
22,235
15,360
5296
48%
4896
42%
4196
2996
Latino CVAP
11,212
15,234
17,814
15,467
11,933
12,407
4096
58%
6896
6m
5496
B196
White CVAP
3,216
5,529
5,061
41200
7 637
1748
1296
2196
1926
1996
3496
1196
African American CVAP
269
751
508
393
445
182
I%
396
296
296
2%
196
Asian CVAP
12,482
14596
4,486
2,407
2,163
1,938
S98
17% 1996
10%
75A-10
City of Santa Ana
Plan C
I
PIAN C
A
B
C
D
E
F
Population
53,852
53.158
55,083
54,848
53,494
54,148
Deviation
(246)
(940)
985
750
(604)
50
0%
-296
296
196
-196
096
18r Citizens (CVAP)
29,015
23,568
20,253
22,779
27,823
16,981
5496
4496
3796
4296
5296
3196
Latino CVAP
11,277
15,473
14,647
16,220
13,426
13,029
3996
6696
7296
7196
4896
77%
White CVAP
4,012
4,101
2,507
4,161
20,533
2,077
1496
17%
1296
1896
3896
1296
African American CVAP
283
712
487
330
423
313
196
396
296
196
2%
296
Asian CVAP
32,846
3,057
2,450
1 1,706
2,905
1,410
4496
11396
12%
1 7%
1 3036
8%
75A-11
City of Santa Ana
Plan D
I
PIAN D
A 8
C
D E
F
Population
53,515 52,395
52,744
56,104 54,425
55,402
Deviation
(583) 1,703)
(1,354)
2,006 327
1,304
-196 -3%
-396
496 196
296
18+ Citizens (CVAP)
'
26,472 22,302
14,018
28,648 25,658
23,321
4996 4396
27%
5196 4796
4296
Latino NAP
10,813 14,772
10,901
15,789 16,595
15,187
4196 66%
7896
5596 65%
6596
White NAP
3,058 4,651
1,799
9,696 5,332
2861
1296 21%
1396
3496 21%
1296
African American CVAP
193 459
193
444 429
840
196 1296
196
296 2%
496
Asan CVAP
11,776 1 2,182
966 1
2,354 2,964
4,134
4496 11096 1
796 1
1% 11296
18%
75A-12
EXHIBIT 4:
CITY OF SANTA ANA CHARTER PROVISIONS
Sec. 101.1. -Wards of the city.
Prior to the general election in 1988 the City Council shall divide the City into six
(6) wards by ordinance according to the following formula:
Each of the wards is to be as nearly equal in population as possible. The wards
shall be composed of contiguous and compact territory and bounded by natural
boundaries of street lines wherever possible. Any territory hereafter annexed to
or consolidated with the City shall become a part of the ward to which it is most
contiguous, pending any redistricting necessary to promote equality of population
among the wards.
(Prop. of 4-9-57, approved on 4-16-57; Prop. of 2-4-63, approved on 4-2-63; Res.
No. 63-027; Ord. No. NS -1316, 8-24-76, approved at election 11-2-76; Ord. No.
NS -1521, 3-17-80, approved at election 6-3-80; Ord. No. NS -1864, 8-19-86,
approved at election 11-4-86)
Sec. 101.2. - Wards, boundary changes.
Ward boundaries shall not be altered except as reasonably necessary to promote
greater equality of population among the wards when such necessity is shown by the
most recent federal decennial census, or by more current census data certified by the
City Council as sufficiently reliable and detailed to serve as a basis for ward boundary
alteration, or by annexation or consolidation of territory. Such boundary alteration shall
be made only by ordinance adopted by affirmative vote of at least two-thirds ( 213 )
of the full membership of the City Council in accordance with section 101.4. Any
such ordinance adopted within one hundred twenty (120) days immediately preceding
any election of council members shall not become effective until the day following such
election.
(Prop. of 4-9-57, approved on 4-16-57; Prop. of 2-4-63, approved on 4-2-63; Res. No. 63-
027; Ord. No. NS -1316, 8-24-76, approved at election 11-2-76)
Sec. 101.4. - Same—Notice and public hearing.
Before making any change, modification or realignment of ward boundaries or
numbers of wards, the City Council shall pass a resolution declaring its intention to make
such changes. Such resolution shall set forth a convenient day, hour and place when and
where any persons having any interest therein, or any objection to the making thereof,
may appear before the City Council and be heard thereon. The City Council shall direct
the Clerk of the Council to give notice by publishing said resolution once a week
for two (2) weeks in the official newspaper prior to the date set for hearing. Said
hearing in the event of increasing the number of wards shall be held not less than
sixty (60) days prior to the succeeding general municipal election. In any event, not
less than thirty (30) days prior to the general municipal election, publication shall
be made by map diagram in the official newspaper showing the new boundary lines
of each and every ward.
75A-13
75A-14
EXHIBIT 5:
ELECTION CODE 10010 Requirements:
Before Maps Drawn - Two Public Hearings required before drawing boundary districts
to seek input regarding the process of the districts — explain the process and encourage
participation.
After Maps Drawn — Publish draft map and hold two public hearings within 45 days.
Publish at least 7 days before consideration at a hearing. If revised, re -publish before
adopting.
DIVISION 10. LOCAL, SPECIAL, VACANCY, AND CONSOLIDATED
ELECTIONS [10000 - 107351
( Division 10 enacted by Stats. 1994, Ch. 920, Sec. 2. )
PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1`10000 - 100101
( Part 1 enacted by Stats. 1994, Ch. 920, Sec. 2. )
CHAPTER 2. District Boundaries 1`10010- 10010.1
( Chapter 2 added by Stats. 2014, Ch. 873, Sec. 1. )
10010.
(a) A political subdivision that changes from an at -large method of election to a
district -based election, or that establishes district -based elections, shall do all of the
following before a public hearing at which the governing body of the political
subdivision votes to approve or defeat an ordinance establishing district -based
elections:
(1) Before drawing a draft map or maps of the proposed boundaries of the
districts, the political subdivision shall hold at least two public hearings over a
period of no more than 30 days, at which the public is invited to provide input
regarding the composition of the districts. Before these hearings, the political
subdivision may conduct outreach to the public, including to non -English-
speaking communities, to explain the districting process and to encourage public
participation.
(2) After all draft maps are drawn, the political subdivision shall publish and
make available for release at least one draft map and, if members of the
governing body of the political subdivision will be elected in their districts at
different times to provide for staggered terms of office, the potential sequence of
the elections. The political subdivision shall also hold at least two additional
hearings over a period of no more than 45 days, at which the public is invited to
provide input regarding the content of the draft map or maps and the proposed
sequence of elections, if applicable. The first version of a draft map shall be
published at least seven days before consideration at a hearing. If a draft
map is revised at or following a hearing, it shall be published and made available
to the public for at least seven days before being adopted.
(b) In determining the final sequence of the district elections conducted in a political
subdivision in which members of the governing body will be elected at different times to
provide for staggered terms of office, the governing body shall give special
75A-15
consideration to the purposes of the California Voting Rights Act of 2001, and it shall
take into account the preferences expressed by members of the districts.
(c) This section applies to, but is not limited to, a proposal that is required due to a
court -imposed change from an at -large method of election to a district -based election.
(d) For purposes of this section, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1) "At -large method of election" has the same meaning as set forth in
subdivision (a) of Section 14026.
(2) "District -based election" has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision
(b) of Section 14026.
(3) "Political subdivision" has the same meaning as set forth in subdivision (c)
of Section 14026.
(e) (1) Before commencing an action to enforce Sections 14027 and 14028, a
prospective plaintiff shall send by certified mail a written notice to the clerk of the
political subdivision against which the action would be brought asserting that the
political subdivision's method of conducting elections may violate the California Voting
Rights Act of 2001.
(2) A prospective plaintiff shall not commence an action to enforce Sections
14027 and 14028 within 45 days of the political subdivision's receipt of the
written notice described in paragraph (1).
(3) (A) Before receiving a written notice described in paragraph (1), or within
45 days of receipt of a notice, a political subdivision may pass a resolution
outlining its intention to transition from at -large to district -based elections, specific
steps it will undertake to facilitate this transition, and an estimated time frame for
doing so.
(B) If a political subdivision passes a resolution pursuant to subparagraph (A), a
prospective plaintiff shall not commence an action to enforce Sections 14027 and 14028
within 90 days of the resolution's passage.
(f) (1) If a political subdivision adopts an ordinance establishing district -based
elections pursuant to subdivision (a), a prospective plaintiff who sent a written notice
pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) before the political subdivision passed its
resolution of intention may, within 30 days of the ordinance's adoption, demand
reimbursement for the cost of the work product generated to support the notice. A
prospective plaintiff shall make the demand in writing and shall substantiate the demand
with financial documentation, such as a detailed invoice for demography services. A
political subdivision may request additional documentation if the provided
documentation is insufficient to corroborate the claimed costs. A political subdivision
shall reimburse a prospective plaintiff for reasonable costs claimed, or in an amount to
which the parties mutually agree, within 45 days of receiving the written demand, except
as provided in paragraph (2). In all cases, the amount of the reimbursement shall
not exceed the cap described in paragraph (3).
(2) If more than one prospective plaintiff is entitled to reimbursement, the political
subdivision shall reimburse the prospective plaintiffs in the order in which they sent a
written notice pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (e), and the 45 -day time period
described in paragraph (1) shall apply only to reimbursement of the first prospective
plaintiff who sent a written notice. The cumulative amount of reimbursements to all
prospective plaintiffs shall not exceed the cap described in paragraph (3).
(3) The amount of reimbursement required by this section is capped at $30,000, as
adjusted annually to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, United States
city average, as published by the United States Department of Labor.
(Amended by Stats. 2017, Ch. 561, Sec. 51. (AB 1516) Effective January 1, 2018.)
75A-16
CITY OF SANATA ANA - PLAN A
Population I US CENSUS
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Population %
ACS White
Deviation
A
54,539
0.8%
441
B
54,399
0.6%
301
C
53,751
-0.6%
(347)
D
53,680
-0.8%
(418)
E
54,038
-0.1%
(60)
F
54,176
0.1%
78
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
ACS Population
ACS White
ACS Black
ACS US -White
ACS American Indian
ACS Asian
ACS Latino
A
56,010
103%
20,097
36%
452
1%
181
0%
17,129
31%
34,503
62%
B
57,618
106%
22,097
38%
626
1%
334
1%
3,719
6%
50,374
87%
C
54,613
102%
30,882
57%
812
1%
433
1%
4,071
7%
37,442
69%
D
54,733
102%
31,560
58%
842
2%
359
1%
6,286
11%
41,021
75%
E
53,783
100%
30,993
584Y.
150
0%
189
0%
1,404
3%
49,738
92%
F
56,177
104%
30,075
54%
974
2%
249
0%
3,439
6%
46,034
82%
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
'Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
ACS US Citizen
ACS US -Latino
AGS US -Not Latino I
ACS US -White
ACS US_Blk
ACS US -Asian
A
40,447
72%
21,795
54%
18,661
46%
3,248
8%
318
10
14,382
36%
B
36,412
63%
30,209
83%
6,203
17%
2,605
7%
459
1%
2,909
8%
C
41,535
76%
25,148
61%
16,409
40%
11,447
2891
635
2%
3,527
89/
D
40,086
73%
27,393
68%
12,691
32%
6,000
15%
789
2%
5,496
14%
E
33,167
62%
29,460
89%
3,710
11%
2,130
6%
103
0%
1,170
4%
F
37,805
6791
28,741
76%
9,056
24%
5,078
13%
781
2%
2,755
7%
'Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
•Percentage based on total ACS Population
137av
75A-17
ACS US
-18+
ACS US -H18+
ACS US- H18+
ACS US -White 18+
ACS US_Blk18+
ACS US_Asian18+
A
27,026
671
11,883
44%
15,141
56%
2,915
11%
263
1%
11,494
43%
B
20,813
38%
15,300
74%
5,506
26%
2,345
11%
444
2%
2,525
12%
C
27,174
51%
13,168
48%
14,030
52%
10,335
38%
396
1%
2,776
10%
D
25,585
48%
14,905
58%
10,682
42%
5,378
21%
754
3%
4,272
17%
E
17,295
32%
14,155
82%
3,116
18%
1,808
10%
93
1%
995
6%
F
22,526
1 429/
14,641
65%
7,872
35%
4,616
20%
609
3%
2,332
10%
•Percentage based on total ACS Population
137av
75A-17
CITY OF SANATA ANA - PLAN B
Population ( US CENSUS
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survev
Population %
ACS White
Deviation
A
53,864
-0.4%
(234)
B
54,497
0.7%
399
C
54,367
0.5%
269
D
53,794
-0.6%
(304)
E
54,269
0.3%
171
F
53,792
-0.6%
(306)
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survev
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
ACS Population
ACS White
ACS Black
ACS US -White
ACS American Indian
ACS Asian
ACS Latino
A
55,749
103%
18,499
33%
427
1%
188
0%
18,065
32%
32,840
59%
B
54,248
100%
31,405
58%
882
2%
306
1%
6,856
13%
39,797
73%
C
57,385
106%
26,952
47%
718
1%
321
1%
3,519
6%
46,679
81%
D
56,093
104%
23,468
42%
618
1%
242
0%
3,440
6%
46,894
84%
E
55,391
102%
33,720
61%
850
2%
453
1%
2,793
5%
42,552
77%
F
54,068
101%
31,660
59%
361
1%
235
0%
1,375
3%
50,350
93%
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
'Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Votive Al Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survev
ACS US Citizen
ACS US -Latino
ACS US No Latino I
ACS US -White
ACS US_Blk
ACS US_Asian
A
40,921
73%
20,822
51%
20,117
49%
3,569
9%
319
1%
15,392
38%
B
40,284
741Y.
27,002
6794
13,285
33%
6,118
15%
799
2%
5,874
15%
C
40,754
71%
31,142
76%
9,614
24%
5,592
14%
657
2%
2,882
7%
D
37,716
67%
29,346
78%
8,350
22%
4,762
13%
408
1%
2,735
7%
E
37,953
69%
25,934
68%
12,048
32%
8,560
23%
707
2%
2,297
6%
F
31,799
59%
28,505
90%
3,311
30%
1,907
6%
198
1%
1,054
3%
'Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Votive Al Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survev
*Percentage based on total ACS Population
75A-18
ACS US
-18+
ACS US -H18+
ACS US- H18+
I ACS US -White 38+
ACS US_BIk18+
ACS US_Ashm18+
A
27,755
689/
11,202
40%
16,555
609'
3,216
12%
269
1%
12,482
45%
B
26,321
48%
15,239
58%
11,091
42%
5,534
21%
751
3%
4,486
17%
C
26,164
48%
17,809
68%
8,336
32%
5,061
19%
5052%
2,417
9%
D
22,589
42%
15,472
68%
7,069
31%
4,200
19%
393
2%
2,163
30%
E
22,235
41%
11,933
549'
10,335
46%
7,637
34%
447
2%
1,943
9%
F
15,365
29%
12,402
81%
2,971
19%
1,754
119
188
1%
898
6%
*Percentage based on total ACS Population
75A-18
CITY OF SANATA ANA - PLAN C
Population I US CENSUS
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Population %
ACS White
Deviation
A
53,852
-0.5%
(246)
B
53,158
-1.7%
(940)
C
55,083
1.8%
985
D
54,848
1.4%
750
E
53,494
-1.1%
(604)
F
54,148
0.1%
50
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Estimate Total US Citizens (AllAges) I American CommunitySurvey
ACS Population
ACS White
ACS Black
ACS US -White
ACSAmerlcan Indian
ACS Asian
ACS Latino
A
561563
105%
20,403
36%
323
1%
281
0%
18,661
33%
32,155
57%
B
53,517
101%
29,649
55%
839
2%
251
0%
4,919
9%
42,751
80%
C
57,352
104%
22,718
40%
783
1%
246
0%
3,629
6%
49,897
87%
D
56,474
103%
30,263
54%
444
1%
255
0%
2,399
4%
48,248
85%
E
54,655
102%
31,972
58%
847
2%
441
1%
4,219
8%
37,043
6891
F
54,373
100%
30,699
5691
620
1%
271
0%
2,221
4%
49,018
90%
Estimate Total US Citizens (AllAges) I American CommunitySurvey
Ve¢entage based on total A6 Populaton
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
ACS US Citizen
ACS US_Latino
ACS US -Not Latino I
ACS US -White
ACS US_Blk
ACS US -Asian
A
42,404
75%
20,834
49%
21,5621
51% 1
4,401
10%
319
1%
15,990
38%
B
37,756
71%
27,968
7491
9,790
26%
4,625
12%
752
2%
4,096
11%
C
36,272
63%
29,927
83%
6,361
18%
2,837
8%
522
1%
2,751
8%
D
37,764
67%
30,261
80%
7,512
20%
4,706
12%
376
1%
1,997
5%
E
41,834
77%
25,034
60%
16,817
409/
11,662
28%
665
2%
3,651
9%
F
33,407
61%
28,727
86%
4,683
14%
2,272
7%
460
1%
1,744
5%
Ve¢entage based on total A6 Populaton
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
*Percentage based on total Ars Popuiatlon
75A-19
ACS US -18+
ACS US -H28+
ACS US_NH18+
I ACS US -White 18+ 1
ACS US_Blk18+
ACS US_ASIan18+
A
29,010
68%
11,267
39%
17,730
61%
4,017
149'
283
1%
12,851
44%
B
23,573
44%
15,478
66%
8,097
34%
4,096
17%
718
3%
3,052
13%
C
20,253
37%
14,647
72%
5,617
28%
2,507
12%
487
2%
2,450
12%
D
22,784
42%
16,210
71%
6,560
29%
4,161
189'
331
1%
1,711
8%
E
27,818
52%
13,426
48%
14,408
52%
10,533
389'
425
2%
2,900
10%
F
16,986
31%
13,034
77%
3,950
23%
2,078
12%
320
2%
1,415
8%
*Percentage based on total Ars Popuiatlon
75A-19
CITY OF SANATA ANA - PLAN D
Population I US CENSUS
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Population %
ACS White
Deviation
A
53,515
-1.1%
(583)
B
52,395
-3.1%
(1,703)
C
52,744
-2.5%
(1,354)
D
56,104
3.7%
2,006
E
54,425
0.6%
327
F
55,402
2.4%
1,304
Estimated Total Current Population I American Community Survey
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
ACS Population
ACS White
ACS Black
ACS US -White
ACS American Indian
ACS Asian
ACS Latino
A
54,867
103%
17,864
33%
252
0%
193
0%
17,04631%
14,507
33,139
83%
B
55,469
105%
30,712
55%
725
1%
294
1%
3,015
5%
46,026
122%
C
50,827
96%
30,230
59%
310
1%
157
0%
1,444
3%
46,683
156%
D
58,013
103%
27,588
48%
851
19,
469
1%
3,775
7%
42,084
97%
E
56,119
103%
29,603
53%
568
1%
330
1%
4,593
8%
44,323
111%
F
57,640
104%
29,707
52%
1,150
2%
302
1%
6,175
11%
46,858
120%
Estimate Total US Citizens (All Ages) I American Community Survey
*Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
ACS US Citizen
ACS US -Latino
ACS US -No t Latino
ACS US -White
ACS US_Blk
ACS US -Asian
A
39,739
72%
20,709
52%
19,030
48%
3,421
9%
2231%
1%
14,507
37%
B
37,611
68%
29,111
77%
8,526
23%
5,085
14%
580
2%
2,500
70
C
29,919
59%
26,208
88%
3,695
12%
2,082
7%
253
1%
1,099
0.
D
43,327
75%
28,333
65%
14,997
35%
10,767
259/
644
1%
3,0201
7%
E
39,906
71%
29,196
73%
10,716
27%
5,997
15%
468
1%
3,854
30%
F
38,946
68%
29,179
75%
9,776
25%
3,151
8%
921
2%
5,254
13%
*Percentage based on total ACS Population
Estimate Citizen Voting Age Population (Age 18+ US Citizens) I American Community Survey
•Percentage based an total A6 Population
75A-20
ACS US -18+
ACS US -H18+
ACS US_NH38+
I ACS US -White 18+
ACS US_BIk18+
ALS US_Asian1$+
A
26,467
67%
10,803
41%
15,657
59%
3,058
12%
193
1%
11,776
44%
B
22,302
43%
14,777
66%
7,547
34%
4,651
21%
459
2%
2,182
109'
C
14,023
27%
10,901
78%
3,114
22%
1,799
139'
193
1%
964
7%
D
28,648
51%
15,789
55%
12,855
45%
9,696
34%
444
2%
2,354
8%
E
25,663
47%
16,595
65%
9,047
35%
5,337
21%
423
2%
2,964
12%
F
23,321
42%
15,192
65%
8,137
35%
2,861
12%
846
4%
4,139
18%
•Percentage based an total A6 Population
75A-20