HomeMy WebLinkAbout80B - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUNDSREQUEST FOR COUNCIL/
HOUSING AUTHORITY
ACTION
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
JULY 2, 2019
TITLE:
APPROVE A PRE -COMMITMENT OF
$3,971,440 OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATIONS OF
A SIXTY-TWO YEAR GROUND LEASE TO
THE RELATED COMPANIES OF CALIFORNIA
AND A COMMUNITY OF FRIENDS FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CROSSROADS AT
WASHINGTON PROJECT LOCATED AT 1126
AND 1146 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE
(APNS 398-092-13 AND 398-092-14)
(STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 5, 3C)
CITY MANAGER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
RECOMMENDED ACTION
CITY COUNCIL
CLERK OF COUNCIL USE ONLY:
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on 1sl Reading
❑ Ordinance on 2nd Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
Authorize the City Manager and the Clerk of the Council to execute a pre -commitment letter with
The Related Companies of California ('Related") and A Community of Friends ("ACOF") as the
service provider for $3,971,440 in affordable housing funds consisting of $963,951 in Neighborhood
Stabilization Program funds and $3,007,489 in HOME Investment Partnerships Program funds, for
the development of the Crossroads at Washington affordable housing project located at 1126 and
1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701, (APNs 398-092-13 and 398-092-14), subject
to non -substantive changes approved by the City Manager and City Attorney.
HOUSING AUTHORITY
Authorize the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and the Recording Secretary to execute
a pre -commitment letter with The Related Companies of California ('Related") and A Community
of Friends ("ACOF") as the service provider to enter into negotiations for a sixty-two (62) year
ground -lease of 1126 E. Washington Ave for the development of the Crossroads at Washington
affordable housing project located at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA
92701, (APNs 398-092-13 and 398-092-14), subject to non -substantive changes approved by
the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and Authority General Counsel.
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 2
2. Authorize the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and the Recording Secretary to enter
into negotiations on a Tenants in Common agreement, or similar document, and any other
required actions necessary to draft that Tenants in Common agreement with the County of
Orange for the joint ownership and development of the Crossroads at Washington affordable
housing project located at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (APNs
398-092-13 and 398-092-14).
Authorize the Executive Director of the Housing Authority and the Recording Secretary to enter
into negotiations on a Joint Powers Agreement, or similar document, and any other required
actions necessary for the properties to be held as Tenants in Common with the County of Orange
for the joint ownership and development of the Crossroads at Washington affordable housing
project located at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (APNs 398-092-
13 and 398-092-14).
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At its regular meeting on May 22, 2019, the Community Redevelopment and Housing Commission
(CRHC) recommended approval of the actions above by a vote of 8:0 (Garcia absent).
DISCUSSION
On June 19, 2018, the City Council authorized
release a FY 2018 — 2019 Request for Proposals
ownership project(s) in the City of Santa Ana.
the Community Development Agency (CDA) to
(RFP # 18-056) to develop affordable rental and
On July 2, 2018, CDA issued RFP # 18-056 for Affordable Housing Development. The RFP was
published on both the City and Housing Authority's websites; a public notice was published in the
OC Register on July 2, 2018; an e-mail was sent out by Orange County's largest affordable housing
membership associations including the Kennedy Commission, 2-1-1 Orange County, and Southern
California Association of Nonprofit Housing; and an electronic letter was e-mailed to interested
developers and nonprofit organizations who had previously requested to be informed of development
opportunities on CDA's RFP Process Database.
The first deadline for the City's RFP # 18-056 for Affordable Housing Development closed on
Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 5:00 p.m. The City received thirteen (13) proposals prior to the
deadline. The affordable housing developers that submitted a proposal are:
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 3
Affordable Housing Developer
Cesar Chavez Foundation
Chelsea Investment Corporation
Community Development Partners — 2 Proposals
Community Housin Works
Habitat for Humanity of Orange Count
HomeAid Orange County
Jamboree Housing — 2 Proposals
National Community Renaissance & Mercy House Living Centers
Orange Housing Development Corporation & C&C Development, LLC
Related California
LINC Housing Corporation
After the deadline, staff conducted a minimum threshold review of each proposal to ensure the
proposal complied with all of the minimum requirements in the RFP. Following the minimum
threshold review, staff formed a Review Panel that consisted of the Executive Director of the City's
Public Works Agency with his designee, the Executive Director of the Planning and Building Agency
with his designee, the Executive Director of the Community Development Agency, and the Housing
Division Manager. The Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Long Beach, the County of Orange,
Keyser Marston Associates, and MDG Associates served as advisors to the Review Panel.
In compliance with the City's Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures, the Review Panel
used the proposal Scoring and Selection Criteria from the RFP to conduct their review and analysis
of each proposal. In addition to the Scoring and Selection Criteria from the RFP, the Review Panel
also reviewed the proposed project design for appropriateness for the proposed target group,
compatibility with surrounding uses, cost effectiveness of construction, and appropriateness of the
design and construction for low maintenance and long term durability.
On October 30, 2018, the Review Panel met and interviewed all of the developers who submitted a
proposal. LINC Housing requested to be removed from consideration prior to their scheduled
interview and therefore their proposal was removed from consideration. On November 14, 2018,
the Review Panel met a second time to discuss and deliberate upon the scoring and selection of the
proposals. Following this deliberative selection process, the Review Panel agreed upon the final
scores below based on an average of the Individual Reviewer Scores:
1W
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 4
Housing Authority Land Asset Requested /
HUD-VASH Vouchers y Non -Housing
Authority Land Asset
Developer Name
Project Name
FINAL SCORE (Average of IntlMitlual
Reviewer Stores)
1126& 1146 E. WastingtonAverue
Orange Housing Development Corporation and
C&C Development, LLC
1128-1148 E. Washington Site
92
Related California
The Crossroads at Washington
91
Jamboree Homing
REVOApartmeras
87
Cesar Chavez Foundation
Santa Ana Place
84
CommunityHousingWadu
Trarefonnar
60
Community Development Partners
Washington Fleas, GRFLD, Lacy Walk
77
Chelsea shnent Corporaton
Cielo
76
826 N. Lecy/830 N. Lacy
Habitat for Hunahity of Orange CouM/
Lacy Streetlaroject
82
Community Development Pampers
Washington Plana, GRFLD, Lacy Was
77
801, 809 & 80912 E. Santa Ana Blvd.
Hom"d Orange County
Frances Xavier Residencs
90
Community Development Partners
Washington Plaza, GRFLD, Lacy WaN
77
HUD-VASH Vouchers (As hie Primary Source
of Firancing)
Jamboree Housing
BWgetlmsite
86
Community Development Partners
WesMew House
81
NorrHowing kahomy land Asset
NaJoal Community Renaissance and Me¢y
Hawse Living Canters
SaNa Ara United Methodist ChuGUSim
93
For the development of the Housing Authority -owned land asset at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington
Ave, the adjacent parcel (APN 398-092-13) to the Housing Authority's parcel (APN 398-092-14) is
owned by the County of Orange ("County"). Therefore on December 4, 2018, the Review Panel sent
a letter to the County and requested their staff to review the top three highest scoring proposals for
the combined site and advise the City on their recommendation for a final developer of the combined
Housing Authority -owned and County -owned parcel. Specifically, the Review Panel recommended
the County select from Orange Housing Development Corporation / C&C Development (92 points),
Related California (91 points) or Jamboree Housing (87 points) as the final developer of the
combined site. The County's award recommendation is contingent upon final approval by the Board
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 5
of Supervisors and the award recommendation for the Housing Authority's parcel is also contingent
upon final approval by the City Council / Housing Authority. The Review Panel recommended that
the County follow a transparent, deliberative selection and review process to include, at a minimum,
conducting in -person interviews with all three developers by their selection team.
In January and February 2019, the County followed a transparent deliberative process and
conducted in -person interviews with the three developers. On March 7, 2019, the County, met with
the City and provided their recommendation for the developer of the combined site. The County
advised the City that the three developers had submitted revised proposals to the County than what
they had originally provided to the City's Review Panel. Therefore, following the recommendation
by the County, the City's Review Panel requested the revised proposals from the three developers
that had been submitted to the County. The revised proposals were provided to the City on March
21, 2019. The City's real estate advisor, Keyser Marston Associates (KMA), completed a preliminary
review of the three revised proposals for the City. Following KMA's analysis, the City's Review Panel
met again on April 10, 2019 and recommended the Related Companies of California with A
Community of Friends as the developer of the combined City and County -owned parcels at 1126
and 1146 E. Washington Avenue (APNs 398-092-13 and 398-092-14). The City and County met
again on April 17, 2019 to finalize the recommendation for joint development of the site, pending
review and approval by the County of Orange Board of Supervisors.
Based on the scores above and the deliberative selection and review process followed by the City
and County, the Review Panel recommends the following award for this project:
Developer: The Related Companies of California and A Community of Friends
Project Name: 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Ave — the "Crossroads at Washington"
Award Recommendation:
Sixty -Two (62) Year Ground Lease
Agreement for 1126 and 1146 E.
Washington Site (APNs 398-092-13 and
$3,080,000
398-092-14) - Appraised Value of APN #
398-092-14 Owned by Housing Authority as
of Oct 25, 2018
HOME Investment Partnerships Program
$3,007,489
HOME funds
Neighborhood Stabilization Program
$963,951
NSP funds
Total Financial Award
$7,051,440
Foerlliw,
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 6
The pre -loan commitment letter with The Related Companies of California with A Community of
Friends as the service provider for $3,971,440 in affordable housing funds consisting of $963,951 in
Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds and $3,007,489 in HOME Investment Partnerships
Program funds, and a sixty-two (62) year ground -lease of 1126 E. Washington Ave, for the
development of the Crossroads at Washington affordable housing project located at 1126 and 1146
E. Washington Ave, Santa Ana, CA 92701, (APNs 398-092-13 and 398-092-14) provides the
enforceable funding commitment from the City (Exhibit 1). Among various other conditions, the pre -
commitment letter is conditional on the developer securing any and all permits and discretionary
approvals that may be required for the Project by the City, Housing Authority, and County. The pre -
commitment does not not obligate the City or any department thereof to approve any application or
request for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other action
necessary for the construction of the project.
In compliance with the City's Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures, KMA has
conducted a preliminary financial gap analysis to confirm the underwriting for the Crossroads at
Washington, the financial gap, and other programmatic requirements related to the funding sources
(Exhibit 2). KMA reviewed the developer's estimates and projections of rents, expenses, reserves
and development costs in accordance with industry -standard underwriting guidelines. Following this
gap analysis and the procurement and deliberative process described above, staff recommends the
full amount of the award to the City Council / Housing Authority for final approval.
Project Description
Following the competitive multi -stage Request for Proposal (RFP) process that included an extensive
RFP response, supplemental proposals, presentations and two interviews, The Related Companies
of California ("Related") in partnership with A Community of Friends ("ACOF") is being recommended
by the City of Santa Ana staff as the developers to co -develop an affordable housing community on
the 1126 & 1146 E. Washington Avenue site (the Project) that was part of the City of Santa Ana RFP
# 18-056. The proposed name for the project is the Crossroads at Washington.
Drawing from more than 60 years of combined experience in the successful development and
ongoing property management of affordable and supportive housing communities, Related and
ACOF are ideally suited to collaborate on the Washington Avenue Site with the City of Santa Ana to
develop an enriched, transit -oriented community that will support housing for extremely low income
families and special needs populations in the City of Santa Ana. The collaboration between Related
and ACOF brings complementary experiences in developing, building, and managing housing for
families and special needs populations; success in competing and receiving local, state, federal, and
private financing; and experience from the development of a large portfolio of award -winning
affordable housing developments. All these benefits ensures the greatest results for the residents
and surrounding community.
As an experienced developer, Related draws on both their market rate and affordable communities
to produce their award -winning housing developments. Related has completed over 11,000 units of
top-quality affordable and mixed income multifamily rental housing throughout California since its
inception in 1989. Over the course of 30 years, Related has partnered with over 25 community-
1 E .,
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 7
based nonprofits and over 20 municipal agencies to help communities realize their affordable
housing needs and redevelopment goals. Related brings a diverse portfolio in project size of 20 to
500 units and product type, new construction and acquisition/rehab. Related successfully led and
completed the entitlements process on 91 tax credit financed developments, 65 of which were new
construction projects. Related's fully integrated development team includes in-house capabilities for
all stages of the development process including planning, entitlements, architecture, finance,
construction and property management. Related is well versed in leveraging public funding sources
and navigating regulatory complexities. In the past five years alone, Related has received over 30
awards, ranging from "Best Affordable Project" to "Real Estate Deal of The Year."
ACOF is one of the.most experienced developers of supportive, special needs and veterans housing
in Southern California, with a track record spanning 30 years and over 2,000 completed units of
supportive housing. As a developer, ACOF has also demonstrated its expertise in affordable housing
development by structuring and securing over $536 million in financing from all levels of government.
ACOF has been a service provider since 1996 and currently provides supportive services in 22
developments for over 700 tenants. ACOF provides an array of intensive supportive services and
connects tenants to the full range of services they need to gain increased independence and remain
stably housed. Integrated services are provided on an ongoing, individualized and flexible basis in
concert with tenants' needs and priorities, both individually and in group settings.
Related has partnered with ACOF as its non-profit partner for the Project to provide the services and
expertise for serving the special needs units. ACOF is one of the most experienced developers of
permanent supportive housing in Los Angeles County and Southern California, with a long track
record of delivering high quality supportive housing for people who were formerly homeless. ACOF
has completed 50 housing developments of supportive housing for homeless individuals and
families.
Related is proposing to develop a new transit -oriented affordable housing community on 2.28 acres
located at 1126 and 1146 Washington Avenue and the County of Orange parcel directly to the South
of 1126 and 1146 Washington Avenue. The site is currently vacant, and positioned within walking
distance from the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center — a key transit hub for not only Orange
County, but all of Southern California. The Project site is on two (2) contiguous undeveloped parcels,
one fronting E. Washington Avenue on the northern half of the site (Housing Authority -owned Parcel)
and one parcel directly south of the City Parcel (County -owned Parcel). The five original buildings
located on the site were demolished in the 1990s by CalTrans during a freeway -widening project. As
a vacant and undeveloped site, there is an opportunity to imagine a newly designed site that will truly
meet the needs of the local community. The entire site is designated District Center (DC) in the City
of Santa Ana 1998 General Plan and zoned Transit Village (TV) in the Transit Zoning Code.
The proposed Project includes the development of one residential building, subdivided into three (3)
residential portions, with 86 units surrounding two interior, landscaped courtyard/amenity spaces
(Exhibit 3). Developed at an overall density of 37.7 units per acre, there will be 16 studios, 26 one -
bedrooms units, 22 two -bedroom units, 17 three -bedroom units, and 5 four -bedroom units. All units
will be flat apartments located on the first, second, and third floors. Currently, the building has been
designed to buffer courtyards, open green areas, and pool area from highway noise and visual
Foerlliffi
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 8
pollution. In addition, a proposed sound wall is being positioned along the eastern property line
adjacent to the US Interstate 5 ramp. Approximately 3,500 square foot of interior community
amenities and leasing offices is designed to accommodate supportive and management services.
One vehicular entry point to the site is provided off E. Washington Avenue. The entry point has a
small driveway roundabout with deliberate urban greening features, to reduce vehicle speeds and
create a welcoming and aesthetically pleasing entrance and pickup/drop-off area for pedestrians,
bike riders, and motor vehicles alike. Careful consideration for the character and scale of the
surrounding neighborhood and buildings were taken into account, to ensure that the project
architecture and massing blends -in with the existing surrounding uses.
The Project proposes a Mission Revival architectural style to complement adjoining neighborhoods
and buildings. In particular, the design is envisioned to complement nearby buildings — similar to the
Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center and the Triada at the Station District Apartments
(developed by Related) — which are part of Santa Ana's extensive history of prominent architecture.
The Project includes amenities ranging from a children's tot lot to a public plaza fronting E. Santa
Ana Boulevard — that acts as a passive and active space at the southern entrance onto the site.
Each outdoor common area is intended to act as a retreat from the surrounding urban landscape.
Overall, the layout of the buildings and common areas are designed to create several unique areas
to best utilize outdoor space. Outdoor amenities include a pool, tot -lot, dog wash, and a BBQ and
picnic area.
Parking
Parking is located along the western property line to take advantage of the only regular geometry on
the site, resulting in a very efficient layout to maximize parking spaces. This pattern allows for direct
resident access to the buildings. Parking will be softened by "fingers of landscape" and a linear tree
line separating parking from the apartments/courtyard. A vehicular gate will provide a degree of
security. Car-share/electric charging spaces will be located near the gate. The proposed Site Plan
includes approximately 110 surface parking spaces, of which 42 spaces would be tandem spaces,
which will be assigned to the three -bedroom and four -bedroom apartments. Residents will not be
charged for parking. As a transit -oriented development, the project is at the start of the OC Streetcar
and directly across the street from the Santa Ana Regional Transportation Center. A total of 110
parking spaces will be sufficient for this type of transit -oriented development.
FOONW46
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 9
Resident Services
As previously described, ACOF provides an array of intensive supportive services and connects
tenants to the full range of services they need to gain increased independence and remain stably
housed. Integrated services are provided on an ongoing, individualized and flexible basis in concert
with tenants' needs and priorities, both individually and in group settings. Examples of the resident
services ACOF can provide at the Project include the following:
Case Management and Service Coordination
Tenant Outreach and Engagement
Employment and Training Services
Housing Outplacement
Independent Living and Life Skills Support
Benefits and Education Assistance
Substance Abuse and Treatment Assistance
and Referrals
Educational Assistance and Referrals
Financial Literacy and Money Management
Classes
Childcare Assistance and Referrals
Family and General Legal Referrals
Domestic Violence Support and Referrals
Food Security and Food Bank Access
Green Education
Individualized Service Plans
Employment & Training
Peer Advocacy
Social Activities/Recreational
Referrals
Community Building Activities (including
social activities, health and fitness activities,
neighborhood watch committee)
Linkages and Referrals to Mainstream
Resources (including healthcare, family and
individual therapy, and mental health)
Health and Wellness Programs
Unit Mix
The Project will be 100% affordable to households earning no more than 30 percent of Area Median
Income (AMI) of which 43 units will be set -aside for Permanent Supportive Housing, with one
exempt 2-bedroom managers unit. The large bedroom units align with the City's priorities and
needs while the Permanent Supportive Housing units meets the County's priorities. The proposed
unit mix and rent restrictions are as follows:
Bedroom
Size
30%
AMI PSH
30%
AMI
Manager's
Unit
Total Units
Studios
16
16
One -Bedroom
26
26
Two -Bedroom
1
20
1
22
Three -Bedroom
17
17
Four -Bedroom
5
5
TOTAL
43
42
1
86
City and County -Owned Parcel Land Use Issues and Proposed Solution
The 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue site is comprised of two adjacent parcels (APNs 398-
092-13 and 398-092-14), one of which is owned by the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana
(APN 398-092-14) and the other owned by the County of Orange (APN 398-092-13). Developing
one affordable housing project across two parcels with differing ownership presents unique
challenges from a development, legal and lending perspective. Through preliminary conversations
Foerlliwo
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 10
with Related's title company, tax credit investor, and legal counsel, it was confirmed that splitting
the buildings through the existing parcel line would require extensive discussions for approval. As
a result, in order to develop the site plan as -is, parcel line changes would be necessary in order to
make the development amendable to key stakeholders in the Project. The following options were
explored during the proposal process:
1) Separate parcels (same site plan) — Two options were explored to retain the separate
ownership of the parcels. With the first option (1 a), the parcel line would be changed and the
City and County would enter a covenant and agree that both lots are considered "tied" and hold
property as one (1) parcel. With the second option (1b), the parcel lines would be changed to
divide the property, and the buildings and units would be separated through a building firewall(s)
in a manner that would allow the property to be divided into two different and independent
properties. The two options were reviewed by City of Santa Ana's Planning and Building
Agency which advised that they will not consider lot tie agreements of parcels with separate
owners for the purpose of the development with buildings that cross property lines as it is
prohibited in the California Building Code. Firewalls will only serve to separate a building with
fire resistance ratings at the property line and a "lot tie" and many easements would still be
required. Retaining separate ownership of the parcels would also pose challenges with the
authority for jurisdiction over the review and issuance of permits which would complicate the
development and permit process.
2) Separate parcels (different site plan with separate buildings) — In this option, the Project would
be redesigned to account for two individual buildings and site plans. Additional agreements
between the City and County allowing an easement from the County parcel through the City
parcel would be required. Additional variances to reduce setback requirements imposed on
each parcel and between buildings to minimize design impact and maximize units would also
be required. This option would create two separate projects which would also affect the
competitiveness of the Project in applying for 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credit financing
due to the smaller size of each individual project.
3) Consolidated Parcels (same site plan) — In this option, ownership of the City and County parcels
would be consolidated under one ownership. Two options were explored. In the first option
(3a), the City or County would sell the land to the other landowner (City/County) and the Parcels
will be under one ownership. In the second option (3b), the City and County would execute a
"grant deed" for joint ownership of the parcels. Joint title to the property would be held as
"Tenants In Common."
Following discussion with the County, City and County staff recommend to develop the properties
underjoint ownership. Consolidating ownership of the site retains the integrity of the site plan and
does not require a redesign or complicate the development, permitting or lending processes. City
and County staff recommend that each landowner (the City and the County) enter into negotiations
on a "grant deed" to merge the ownership of the parcels into one joint ownership by the City and
County, and to convey an interest in the respective parcels into a jointly held "tenants in common"
ownership structure, with title for the joint property to be held as Tenants in Common (TIC). This
TIC structure would be comprised of an ownership arrangement in which the two jurisdictions would
jointly own a single parcel formed from APN Nos. 398-092-13 and 398-092-14, and title would be
held individually to the extent of each party's proportional interest in the combined two parcels.
FOODIME1
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 11
This TIC ownership structure could help to simplify ground leasing and developing a jointly held
property. The percentage ownership for each landowner will be determined based on the
percentage of the current acreage between the two parcels. The Housing Authority's parcel is
1.456 acres and the County's parcel is .83 acres. One ground lease agreement with both
landowners can then be entered into with Related for the development of the site. During the
development process the parcels will be combined into one, creating a single APN number, which
will allow more flexibility on site development.
Following approval by the City Council / Housing Authority, staff will work with the County to bring
the Project to the Board of Supervisors for selection of Related and ACOF as the Project developer
and approval of a ground -lease agreement and joint powers agreement arrangement with the City.
Staff will draft and negotiate a Tenants in Common agreement, a Joint Powers Agreement, or
similar document, and any other required actions necessary to draft that Tenants in Common
agreement with the County of Orange for the joint ownership and development of the Crossroads
at Washington. The approval of the Tenants in Common agreement and Joint Powers Agreement
will be contingent upon final approval by the City Council and the County Board of Supervisors.
The final project will require review of the site plan by an interdepartmental team of staff and may
require review and approval by the Planning Commission.
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal # 5 - Community Health, Livability,
Engagement & Sustainability, Objective #3 (Facilitate diverse housing opportunities and support
efforts to preserve and improve the livability of Santa Ana neighborhoods), and Strategy C (Provide
that Santa Ana residents, employees, artists and veterans receive priority for affordable housing
created under the City's Housing Opportunity Ordinance or with City funding to the extent allowed
under state law).
FISCAL IMPACT
The various agreements, including the loan payment, are estimated to be finalized for City Council
/ Housing Authority approval in FY 2020-21. Upon future approval of the loan agreements, funds
will be budgeted and available as shown below: ,
Fiscal
Accounting Unit
Accounting Unit,
Year
— Account #
Fund Description
Account
Amount
Description
FY 20-21
13018780-69152
HOME Program
Loans & Grants
$3,007,489
FY 20-21
14218760-69152
Neighborhood
Loans & Grants
$ 788,000
Stabilization Program 1
FY 20-21
14218761-69152
Neighborhood
Loans & Grants
$ 131,000
Stabilization Program 2
FY 20-21
14218762-69152
Neighborhood
Loans & Grants
$ 44,951
Stabilization Program 3
Total Loans
$3,971,440
Pre -Commitment of Affordable Housing Funds and a Ground Lease to Related Companies
July 2, 2019
Page 12
Steven A. Mendoza
Executive Director
APPROVED AS TO FUNDS AND ACCOUNTS:
"
Kathryn D�PA
Executive Director
Community Development Agency Finance and Management Services Agency
Exhibits: 1. Pre -Commitment Letter with Related and ACOF
2. Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis by Keyser Marston Associates
3. Proposed Project Renderings / Preliminary Site Plan
EXHIBIT 1
MAYOR
Miguel A. Pulido
MAYOR PRO TEM
Juan Villages
COUNCILMEMBERS
Cecilia Iglesias
David Penaloza
Vicente Sarmiento
Jose Solodo
CITY OF SANTA ANA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
20 Civic Center Plaza M-25 • P.O. Box 1988
Santa Ana, California 92702
(714) 647-5360
w .santa-ana.om
June 18, 2019
Liane Takano
Southern California Director
The Related Companies of California
18201 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92612
Dora Leong Gallo
Chief Executive Officer
A Community of Friends
3701 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Los Angeles, CA 90010
CITY MANAGER
Kristine Ridge
CITY ATTORNEY
Sonia R. Carvalho
ACTING CLERK OF THE COUNCIL
Norma Mitre -Ramirez
Re: Crossroads at Washington
1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701
Pre -Commitment Letter for: NSP Loan, HOME Loan, and Lease Agreement
Dear Ms. Takano and Ms. Gallo,
The Related Companies of California and A Community of Friends (collectively referred to
as the "Developer") requested financial assistance in connection with the proposed
development of an eighty-six (86) unit affordable housing complex, with eighty-five (85) units
restricted to extremely -low income households, to be located at 1126 and 1146 E.
Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (APNs 398-092-13 and 398-092-14) ("Project').
The site consists of two adjacent parcels. The Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana
("Housing Authority') owns one parcel at 1126 E. Washington Ave. (APN 398-092-14)
totaling approximately 1.43 acres of land area ("Housing Authority Parcel"). The County of
Orange ("County") owns an adjacent parcel (APN 398-092-13) totaling approximately .85
acres of land area ("County Parcel"). The Housing Authority and County will work together
to merge their respective parcels with joint ownership for purposes of master leasing the
parcels to the Developer to construct the Project over a single parcel ("Property').
Foorlimp
EXHIBIT 1
The City of Santa Ana ("City") and the Housing Authority have reviewed the Developer's
request for assistance, and at the City Council/Housing Authority meeting on June 18, 2019,
the City Council and Housing Authority Board authorized and approved issuance of this pre -
commitment letter evidencing the preliminary award of (collectively, the "City Assistance"):
- A loan in the maximum amount of $963,951.00 from the Neighborhood
Stabilization Program ("NSP") held by the City for the Project ("NSP Loan");
A loan in the maximum amount of $3,007,489.00 from the HOME Investment
Partnerships Program ("HOME") held by the City for the Project ("HOME Loan');
and,
- A 62-year ground lease for the Housing Authority portion of the Property located
at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (APNs: 398-
092-13 and 398-092-14); to be used for development of an eighty-six (86) unit
affordable housing complex, with eighty-five (85) units restricted to extremely -low
income households ("Ground Lease').
This letter shall evidence the City's pre -commitment of the City Assistance to the Developer
for the Project subject to the conditions described below.
NSP and HOME Loans:
The amount of the proposed NSP and HOME Loans has been determined based upon the
City's review of the Developer's request for the receipt of the City Assistance and the
development proforma and projected cash flows for the Project submitted by the Developer
to the City ("Proforma"). The City Manager has authority to approve revised development
proformas and projected cash flows for the Project; provided, however, that the City
Assistance is not increased or extended.
The NSP and HOME Loans shall include the following terms:
• The NSP Loan shall be for a maximum principal amount of $963,951.00, or as much
thereof as is disbursed for hard and soft costs in constructing the Project, provided
from NSP funds.
• The HOME Loan shall be for a maximum principal amount of $3,007,489.00, or as
much thereof as is disbursed for hard and soft costs in constructing the Project,
provided from HOME funds.
• 3% simple interest per annum.
• Repayment from 33.3% of Residual Receipts (pro-rata with payments due in
connection with other financing provided by other public agencies) (after payment of
operating expenses, debt service, any deferred developer fee, and partnership fees
FOODIMEA
EXHIBIT 1
to be described in the Agreement), with 33.4% to the County, and the remaining
33.3% to be disbursed to the Developer.
Remaining principal and accrued interest due upon the 55th anniversary of the
issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or earlier upon sale, refinancing or default. On
that date, the City and Housing Authority agrees to review the performance of the
Property and consider in good faith any reasonable request by Developer to modify
the terms or extend the term of the City Promissory Notes. Additionally, the City will
receive a pro rata share of 33.3% of the net proceeds received from any sale or
refinancing of the Project, after payment of outstanding debt and payment in full of
any deferred developer fee and establishment of any reserves and transaction costs.
Cost savings from the Project, if any, will be applied first to pay down the NSP and
HOME Loans, subject to compliance with the Tax Credit Allocation Committee
("TCAC") Regulations and California Health and Safety Code, as applicable.
After all other funding sources have been secured through enforceable funding
commitments, a HOME Subsidy Layering Review is required in order to formally
commit HOME funds to the Project.
The HOME Loan shall also require specific HOME designated units in the Project.
Based on a preliminary HOME Cost Allocation Analysis, the City must designate at least
sixteen (16) units in the Project as HOME assisted -units per the following preliminary
unit mix:
• Three (3) studio units;
• Five (5) one -bedroom units;
• Four (4) two -bedroom units;
• Three (3) three -bedroom units; and,
• One (1) four -bedroom unit.
As least 20% of the HOME designated units must be designated as Low HOME units.
This equates to four (4) Low HOME units based on a sixteen (16) unit HOME
requirement. The remainder of the HOME designated units can be restricted as High
HOME units. This is subject to change based on a final HOME Cost Allocation Analysis
to be completed prior to a formal commitment of HOME funds to the Project.
Ground Lease:
The Project will be located on the Property at 1126 and 1146 E. Washington Avenue,
currently owned by the Housing Authority, as well as the adjacent parcel owned by the
County (APNs: 398-092-13 and 398-092-14). The Housing Authority will be working with
the County to draft and negotiate the necessary documents to join ownership so that the
Project may be constructed over the combined Property under a master lease with the
Housing Authority and County, as joint owners.
,•1m
The ground lease payments will be structured as capitalized ground rent payments based
on the appraised fair market value of the Property. The Developer estimates the current
value of the Property at $5,580,000. This figure will need to be confirmed through an
appraisal, but based on the Developer's assessment, the capitalized ground rent
payments are estimated as follows:
• The capitalized ground rent payment for the County parcel is estimated at
$2,500,000; and,
• The capitalized ground rent payments for the Housing Authority parcel is estimated
at $3,080,000.
These amounts will be secured by a promissory note on the Property and be repaid
through a share of the Project's residual receipts to be paid to the County and Housing
Authority respectively.
Based on the above, the Housing Authority Board authorized a preliminary award of a 62-
year lease of the Housing Authority portion of the Property to the Developer for the
Project. After Developer secures a commitment from the County for a 62-year lease of
the County portion of the Property, staff will return to the Housing Authority for
consideration of a 62-year Ground Lease Agreement. There will only be one final Ground
Lease Agreement that will have all three parties: the County, City (as tenants in common)
and the Developer. The Ground Lease Agreement will be contingent on the successful
development of the Project by the Developer.
General Provisions:
The City's obligation to provide the City Assistance to the Project is subject to each of the
following conditions:
Developer must provide proof that it has secured all of its remaining financing for
the development of the Project in the form of enforceable funding commitments,
including, but not limited to, 9% or 4% Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credits,
State Housing Tax Credits, a loan of affordable housing funds from the County of
Orange, Section 8 project -based vouchers from the Orange County Housing
Authority, or any other funding sources necessary in the Project's capital stack to
close on their financing, before staff will return to the City Council for consideration
of the NSP and HOME Loan Agreements.
• Developer must provide proof that the County has approved or committed to approve
a 62-year ground lease for the County portion of the Property located at 1126 and
1146 E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701 (APNs: 398-092-13 and 398-
092-14) before staff will return to the Housing Authority for consideration of the
Ground Lease Agreement.
• All of the affordable units in the Project will be restricted to extremely low-income
households.
,•1M •
O3:11:31a
• The rent standards for the Project must be in compliance with the strictest of the
standards imposed by TCAC and HOME Program regulations, or other funding
sources contributed to the Project, as applicable.
• All provided funding and Project requirements shall conform to the City's adopted
Affordable Housing Funds Policies and Procedures, unless alternative
requirements are expressly provided in the executed NSP and HOME Loan
Agreements, Ground Lease Agreement, or any other documents related to the
development of the Project.
• Approval of all required entitlements and discretionary actions, to allow the
construction of an 86-unit affordable housing complex to be located at 1126 and 1146
E. Washington Avenue, Santa Ana, CA 92701.
• The City's obligation to provide the NSP Loan and HOME Loan is and shall remain
subject to all covenants, conditions, and restrictions set forth in the Loan Agreements,
and in particular City's analysis of the available funding sources and development
and operating costs of the Project and the overall economic feasibility of the Project.
• Review and approval of the documents evidencing the NSP Loan and HOME Loan
by the City Council.
• Review and approval of the documents evidencing the Ground Lease by the Housing
Authority and the County.
• Project funding is contingent on the successful execution of a 62-year Ground
Lease Agreement by the Developer with the Housing Authority and County.
• Compliance with California Health and Safety Code and applicable regulations set
forth in Section 34176.
Developer, at its sole cost and expense, will be responsible for securing any and all
permits and discretionary approvals that may be required for the Project by the City,
Housing Authority, County, or any other federal, state, or local governmental entity having
or claiming jurisdiction over the Property or Project. Notably, this pre -commitment letter
shall not obligate the City or any department thereof to approve any application or request
for or take any other action in connection with any planning approval, permit or other
action necessary for the construction, rehabilitation, installation or operation of the
Project.
This pre -commitment letter for the Project will expire on June 18, 2022.
,•1M
EXHIBIT 1
If you have any questions or require any additional information regarding this pre -
commitment letter, please contact Judson Brown, Housing Division Manager, by
telephone at (714) 667-2241 or by e-mail at ibrown(a)santa-ana.oro.
Sincerely,
On behalf of the City of Santa Ana:
Kristine Ridge
City Manager
Attest:
Norma Mitre
Acting Clerk of the Council
On behalf of the Housing Authority of the City of Santa Ana:
Steven A. Mendoza
Housing Authority Executive Director
/d147TR
Norma Mitre
Acting Recording Secretary
FOODIMU46
EXHIBIT 2
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES.
ADVISORS IN PUBLIC/PRIVATE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM
ADVISORS IN:
Real Estate
To: Judson Brown, Housing Division Manager
Affordable Housing
Economic Development
City of Santa Ana
BERKELEY
A. Jerry Keyser
From: Tim Bretz
Timothy C. Kelly
Debbie M. Kern
Parker Dietz
David Doezema
Kevin Feeney
Date: May 22, 2019
Los ANGELES
Kathleen H. Head
James A. Rabe
Subject: 1126-46 East Washington Ave— Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
Gregory D. Soo-Hoo
Kevin E. Engstrom
Julie L. Romey
At your request, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. (KMA) prepared a preliminary financial
Tim R. Bretz
gap analysis for the project proposed to be developed at 1126 —1146 East Washington
SAN DIEGO
Paul C. Marra
Avenue (Site) by Related California (Developer). The Developer is proposing to
construct an 86-unit apartment project with 85 units restricted to extremely -low income
households (Project). One unit will be un-restricted and reserved for an on -site
manager.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Site consists of two adjacent parcels. The Housing Authority of the City of Santa
Ana (Housing Authority) owns one parcel totaling approximately 1.43 acres of land area
(Housing Authority Parcel). The County of Orange (County) owns an adjacent parcel
totaling approximately 0.85 acres of land area (County Parcel). Collectively, the Housing
Authority Parcel and the County Parcel are referred to as the "Site" in this analysis. The
Housing Authority and the County are working together to develop the Site with the
proposed Project.
The Developer is requesting the following assistance from the City of Santa Ana (City)
and the Housing Authority:
1. A long-term ground lease for the Housing Authority Parcel;
500 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE, SUITE 1480 > LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071 > PHONE 213.622.8095
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
VAM.KEYSERMARSTON.COM
80B-19
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 2
2. A loan of HOME Program (HOME) funds allocated to the City by the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and
3. A loan of Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) funds allocated to the City
by HUD.
The purpose of KMA analysis is to evaluate the Developer's assistance request.
Estimated Financial Gap
The results of the KMA financial gap analysis are compared to the Developer's financial
proposal in the following table:
KMA
Developer
Difference
Total Development Costs $38,688,000
$38,734,000
($46,000)
Outside Funding Sources 34,746,000
34,762,000
(16,000)
Financial Gap $3,942,000
$3,972,000
($30,000)
As shown in the preceding table, KMA estimates the Project's financial gap at $3.94
million. Comparatively, the Developer is requesting $3.97 million in financial assistance
from the City. This represents a less than 1% differential, which can be considered
inconsequential. However, it is important to note that the KMA and Developer
estimates differ on a line item by line item basis.
Proposed Funding Sources
The following summarizes the proposed funding sources for the Project:
1. It is estimated that the Project will receive forty-three (43) Section 8 Project
Based Vouchers (PBVs) that are allocated to the County by HUD.
2. The Project's stabilized net operating income (NOI) supports $2.90 million in
permanent financing.
The Developer is proposing to apply for 9% Federal Low Income Housing Tax
Credits (Federal Tax Credits) that are competitively awarded by the California Tax
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO W
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 3
Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC). The net Federal Tax Credit proceeds are
estimated at $18.98 million.
4. The Developer is proposing to apply for State Housing Tax Credits (State Tax
Credits) that are awarded by TCAC. The net State Tax Credit proceeds are
estimated at $5.0 million.
5. The Developer is proposing to apply for a loan of permanent supportive housing
(OCHA PSH Loan) funds awarded by the Orange County Housing Authority
(OCHA).
6. The Developer proposes to ground lease the Housing Authority and County
parcels based on current fair market value of the Site. The capital ground rent
payment amounts are estimated as follows:
a. A $2.50 million capitalized ground rent payment to the County; and
b. A $3.08 million capitalized ground rent payment to the Housing
Authority.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed scope of development can be described as follows:
1. The site is comprised of 2.28 acres, or 99,317 square feet of land area.
2. The Project's unit mix is as follows:
Number of
Unit Size
Units
SF
Studio Units
16
400
One -Bedroom Units
26
600
Two -Bedroom Units
22
850
Three -Bedroom Units
17
1,100
Four -Bedroom Units
5
1,300
Total / Weighted Average
86
766
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
F4
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
Page 4
3. Detailed project plans were not available for review. As such, KMA estimates
the Project's gross building area (GBA) at 85,000 square feet, which is comprised
of the following:
a. The residential GBA is estimated at 65,900 square feet;
b. The community building GBA is estimated at 3,500 square feet; and
C. The circulation / common area GBA is estimated at 15,600 square feet.
4. The Project includes 110 surface parking spaces, which equates to
approximately 1.28 parking spaces per unit.
5. The Project's proposed affordability mix is as follows:
Tax Credit @ 30% Median/Moderate H&SC/Low HOME 1 85
Unrestricted Manager's Unit 1
Total Units 86
FINANCIAL GAP ANALYSIS
KMA prepared a pro forma analysis to assist in evaluating the Developer's proposal. The
analysis is located at the end of this memorandum, and is organized as follows:
Table 1: Estimated Development Costs
Table 2: Stabilized Net Operating Income
Table 3: Financial Gap Calculation
Table 4: Preliminary HOME Cost Allocation
1 H&SC = the California Health and Safety Code, and the "Median" represents the Orange County Median
Income published by HCD. The median income published by TCAC is referred to as the TC Median.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 5
Estimated Development Costs (Table 1)
KMA reviewed the Developer's development cost estimates, and then independently
prepared a pro forma analysis for the Project. The resulting development costs are
estimated as follows:
Property Assemblage Costs
The Developer will enter into longterm ground leases with the Housing Authority and
the County for both the Housing Authority Parcel and the County Parcel. As proposed,
the ground lease payments will be structured as capitalized ground rent payments
based on the appraised fair market value of the Site. The Developer estimates the
current value of the Site at $5.58 million.' Thus, the capitalized ground rent payments
are estimated as follows:
1. The capitalized ground rent payment for the County Parcel is estimated at $2.50
million; and
2. The capitalized ground rent payment for the Housing Authority Parcel is
estimated at $3.08 million.
Direct Costs
The direct cost estimates assume that the Project will be subject to State of California
and/or Federal Davis Bacon prevailing wage requirements. The direct costs applied in
this analysis can be summarized as follows:
1. The Developer estimated the off -site improvement costs at $493,000. City staff
should verify the scope and cost of the off -site improvements required to serve
the Project.
2. The on -site improvement costs are estimated at $30 per square foot of land
area, or $2.98 million.
The surface parking costs are estimated at $3,000 per space, or $330,000.
z An appraisal was not available for the fair market value of the combined Housing Authority and County
Parcels. This analysis will need to be updated if the appraised value of the Site differs from the estimate
used in the analysis.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 6
4. The residential shell costs are estimated at $170 per square foot of residential
GBA, or $14.43 million.
5. A $550,000 allowance for furnishings, fixtures and equipment is provided.
6. A 14% allowance for contractor fees and general requirements is provided.
7. An allowance for construction bonds / general liability insurance at 2% of
construction costs is provided.
8. The third -party construction management costs are estimated at $150,000.
9. A direct cost contingency allowance equal to 5% of other direct costs is provided
KMA estimates the total direct costs at $22.95 million. This equates to $270 per square
foot of GBA.
Indirect costs
KMA utilized the following assumptions in estimating the indirect costs:
1. The architecture, engineering and consulting costs are estimated at 7% of direct
costs.
2. The Developer estimated the public permits and fees costs at $3.05 million, or
$35,500 per unit. City staff should verify the accuracy of this estimate.
3. The taxes, insurance, legal and accounting costs are estimated at 2.5% of direct
costs.
4. An approximately $1,700 per unit allowance for marketing and leasing costs is
provided.
5. The Developer Fee is set at $2.41 million, which is the maximum amount allowed
to be included in the Project by TCAC.
6. An indirect cost contingency allowance equal to 5% of other indirect costs is
provided.
KMA estimates the total indirect costs at $8.18 million.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
Financing Costs
The financing costs for the Project are estimated as follows:
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
Page 7
1. The construction period and absorption period interest costs are estimated at
$1.21 million. This estimate is based on the following assumptions:
a. A $24.08 million construction loan;
b. A 4.38% interest rate;
C. An 18-month construction period with a 60% average outstanding loan
balance; and
d. A 3-month absorption period with a 100% average outstanding loan
balance.
2. The financing fees for the construction and permanent loans are estimated at
1.50 points, or $505,000.
3. A $248,000 capitalized operating reserve account is provided. This equates to
approximately three months of operating expenses and debt service payments.
4. The Tax Credit fees are estimated at $115,000 based on the following:
a. A $2,000 application fee;
b. A $410 per unit monitoring fee; and
C. Four percent (4%) of gross Tax Credit proceeds for one year.
KMA estimates the total financing costs at $38.69 million.
Total Development Costs
As shown in Table 1, KMA estimates the total development costs at $36.69 million,
which equates to approximately $449,900 per unit. In comparison, the Developer
estimates the total development costs at $38.73 million. This equates to a less than 1%
differential, which can be considered an insignificant difference.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 8
Stabilized Net Operating Income (Table 2)
The Project's funding sources include Tax Credits, HOME funds and NSP funds. In
addition, the Housing Authority Parcel was purchased with Property Tax Increment
Housing Set -Aside (Set -Aside) Funds. These programs all publish the applicable income
limits for households that are qualified to reside in the development.
TCAC and the HOME Program publish rent standards for projects that receive Tax
Credits and HOME funds, respectively. Comparatively, Health and Safety Code Section
50053 defines the methodology that must be used to calculate the affordable housing
costs for projects that include Set -Aside Funds. The Developer will be required to
adhere to the strictest of the standards imposed by the funding sources contributed to
the Project.
Achievable Rent Income
The rents used in this analysis are based on 2019 information published by TCAC and
HCD, and 2018 information published by the HOME Program.' For the purposes of this
analysis, KMA set the HOME rents at the Low HOME standard; however, only 20% of the
HOME -designated units need to be restricted to Low HOME rents. The maximum
allowable rents, net of the appropriate utility allowances, are estimated as follows:'
30%
Moderate
Low
Applicable
TCAC
H&SC
HOME
Rents
Rent Restriction
Studios
$575
$1,837
$909
$575
1-Bedrooms
611
2,097
969
611
2-Bedrooms
723
2,345
1,152
723
3-Bedrooms
825
2,592
1,321
825
4-Bedrooms
907
2,783
1,460
907
3 As of May 22, 2019, HUD had not yet published the 2019 HOME rents.
4 The monthly utility allowances are estimated at: $48 for studio units; $56 for one -bedroom units; $78 for
two -bedroom units; $100 for three -bedroom units; and $125 for four -bedroom units.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO •
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
Page 9
The Developer will request 43 PBVs from the County for the Project. The PBV payments
are equal to the difference between the tenants' rent payments and the fair market
rents (FMRs) approved by the County. The 2019 FMRs for the Project are estimated as
follows:
Studio Units $1,362
One -Bedroom Units $1,470
Two -Bedroom Units $1,807
Estimated Effective Gross Income
KMA estimates the Project's effective gross income at approximately $1.05 million
based on the following assumptions:
1. The base rental income is estimated at $705,900.
2. The PBV income is estimated at $432,100.
3. Laundry and miscellaneous income is estimated to average $6 per unit per
month for a total of $6,200 per year.
4. A vacancy and collection allowance equal to 7.5% of gross affordable income is
provided. This equates to $53,400.
A vacancy and collection allowance for Section 8 Subsidy equal to 10% of gross
subsidy income is provided. This equates to $43,200
Estimated Operating Expenses
The operating expenses are estimated at $705,900 based on the following assumptions:
1. The general operating expenses are estimated at $5,880 per unit per year.
2. KMA assumes the Developer will apply for the property tax abatement that is
accorded to non-profit housing organizations that own and operate apartment
units that are restricted to households earning less than 80% of the Median. The
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
Page 10
Developer estimates that the Project will incur $2,000 per year in property tax
assessment override costs.
3. The Developer is proposing to provide social services at an estimated cost of
$170,000 per year.
4. The Project will be subject to a County monitoring fee estimated at $2,400 per
year.
5. The Developer provided an allowance for replacement reserve deposits at $300
per unit per year. This exceeds the minimum amount required by TCAC.
Stabilized Net Operating Income
The Project's effective gross income is estimated at $1.05 million, and the operating
expenses are estimated at $705,900. This results in an estimated stabilized net
operating income of $341,700.
Financial Gap Calculation
The financial gap is estimated by deducting the available outside funding sources from
the Project's total development costs. The outside funding sources anticipated to be
received by the Project are described in the following sections of this analysis.
Available Funding Sources
Permanent Loan
To estimate the maximum permanent loan that can be supported by the Project's NO[,
KMA assumed that the loan would be underwritten based on the following
requirements:
1. A 120% debt service coverage ratio;
2. A 5.50% interest rate; and
3. A 15-year amortization period.
Based on these assumptions, KMA estimates that the $341,700 NOI can support a $2.90
million permanent loan.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO •
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 11
Federal Tax Credit Proceeds
Tax Credit Basis
KMA estimates the net Federal Tax Credit proceeds at $18.99 million. This estimate is
based on the following assumptions:
1. The Project's eligible Tax Credit basis is equal to the lesser of the depreciable
costs for the 86 Tax Credit units, or the threshold basis limits established by
TCAC. In this case, the Project's depreciable costs are estimated at $30.42
million, and the threshold basis limits applied by TCAC equal $33.64 million.
2. To increase the competitiveness of the Project's Tax Credit application in the
TCAC tiebreaker process, the Developer is proposing to voluntarily exclude a
portion of the eligible Tax Credit basis.
3. The Project is not located in a designated "Difficult to Develop" census tract.
4. The current Tax Credit regulations set the annual Tax Credit rate at 9.0%. This
rate is applied over the 10-year Tax Credit period.
100% of the Project's building area is located in units that qualify for Federal Tax
Credits.
6. The net syndication value supported by the Tax Credit is ultimately determined
based on competitive market conditions and on the timing of the disbursements.
Based on currently available information, KMA and the Developer estimate the
proceeds at $0.98 per gross Federal Tax Credit dollar.
State Tax Credits
Since the Project is not located in a "Difficult to Develop" census tract, the Project will
apply for State Tax Credits awarded by TCAC. The net syndication value supported by
the State Tax Credit is ultimately determined based on competitive market conditions
and on the timing of the disbursements. Based on currently available information, KMA
and the Developer estimate the State Tax Credit proceeds at $0.77 per gross State Tax
Credit dollar, which equates to $5.0 million in State Tax Credit proceeds.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
EXHIBIT 2
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 12
OCHA PSH Loan
The Developer is proposing to apply for $2.28 million in permanent supportive housing
funds awarded by the Orange County Housing Authority.
County Capitalized Ground Rent Payment
The County's Capitalized Ground Rent Payment is estimated at $2.50 million. This
amount will be secured by a promissory note on the property and be repaid through a
share of the Project's residual receipts.
City Capitalized Ground Rent Payment
The City's Capitalized Ground Rent Payment is estimated at $3.08 million. This amount
will be secured by a promissory note on the property and be repaid through a share of
the Project's residual receipts.
Deferred Developer Fee
The Developer is not proposing to defer any of the Developer Fee as a permanent
funding source.
Total Available Funding Sources
As shown in Table 3, the outside funding sources available to the Project are estimated
at $34.75 million. In comparison, the Developer estimates the available outside funding
sources at $34.76 million. This equates to an approximately $16,000 differential, which
is due to a slight difference in vacancy and collection allowance assumptions between
KMA and the Developer.
Estimated Financial Gap
Based on the preceding analysis, KMA estimates the Project's financial gap as follows:
Total Development Costs $38,688,000
(Less) Total Available Outside Funding Sources (34,746,000)
Financial Gap $3,942,000
Per Unit $45,800
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
Fo I P M
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
Page 13
As shown in the table above, KMA estimates that the Project exhibits a $3.94 million
financial gap. In contrast, the Developer is requesting $3.97 million in financial
assistance from the City. This represents a $30,000 differential, which is a less than 1%
difference. It is the KMA opinion that a difference of this magnitude can be considered
insignificant.
CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS
The following summarizes the conclusions of the KMA analysis:
1. Based on the currently available information, it is KMA's conclusion that the
Developer's request for $3.97 million in financial assistance is supported by the
Project economics. However, given the preliminary nature of the proposal, if the
scope of development or financing assumptions change, the KMA analysis may
need to be updated accordingly.
2. The Developer initially requested to ground lease the Housing Authority Parcel
for a 99-year ground lease term. At a minimum, the ground lease term must be
set at 57 years to comply with TCAC's requirements. However, based on the
KMA analysis and discussions with the Developer, it was determined that a
shorter ground lease term is sufficient to meet the requirements of most lenders
and Tax Credit investors. As such, KMA recommends that the Housing Authority
work with the Developer and the County to negotiate a ground lease term
between 57 — 75 years. Additionally, the Housing Authority, County and
Developer should work to negotiate the specific terms of the ground leases.
3. The City / Housing Authority should discuss the proposed residual receipts
distributions with the County and the Developer.
4. It is important to note that 100% of the affordable units will be restricted to
extremely low income households. As such, the only reason the Project is
operationally feasible is due to the 43 PBVs proposed to be provided by the
County. If the PBVs are terminated, the Project's net operating income will go
negative immediately, which could pose a risk of foreclosure if this occurs during
the permanent loan term.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
Judson Brown, City of Santa Ana
EXHIBIT 2
May 22, 2019
1126-46 E. Washington Ave: Preliminary Financial Gap Analysis Page 14
5. Based on a preliminary HOME Cost Allocation Analysis, the City must designate
at least 15 units in the Project as HOME units per the following unit mix:
a. Three (3) studio units;
b. Four (4) one -bedroom units;
C. Four (4) two -bedroom units;
d. Three (3) three -bedroom units; and
e. One (1) four -bedroom unit.
6. At least 20% of the HOME -designated units must be designated as Low HOME
units. This equates to three Low HOME units based on a 15-unit HOME
Requirement. The remainder of the HOME -designated units can be restricted as
High HOME units.
7. It is important to note that the City cannot commit HOME funds to the Project
until after all of the other funding sources have received formal commitments.
At that time, the City must prepare a HOME Subsidy Layering Review in order to
formally commit HOME funds to the Project.
1905019:SA:TRB
19090.017.019
FO
EXHIBIT 2
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED DEVELOPMENT COSTS
1126-46 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
I. Capitalized Ground Rent Payment
II. Direct Costs
Off -site Improvements
On -site Improvements
Surface Parking Costs
Residential Building Costs
Furnishings, Fixtures & Equipment
Contractor Fees / General Requirements
Construction Bonds/Insurance
Construction Management
Direct Cost Contingency Allowance
Total Direct Costs
III. Indirect Costs
Arch, Eng, & Consulting
Public Permits & Fees
Taxes, Insurance, Legal & Accounting
Marketing & Leasing
Developer Fee
Soft Cost Contingency Allowance
Total Indirect Costs
IV. Financing Costs
Interest During Construction
Financing Fees
Construction Loan
Permanent Loans
Capitalized Reserves
Operating Reserve
TCAC Fees
Total Financing Costs
3 99,317
Sf Land
2
3
99,317
Sf Land
110
Spaces
85,000
Sf GBA
14.0%
Construction Costs
2.0°%
Construction Costs
5.0%
Other Direct Costs
85,000
Sf GBA
7.0%
Direct Costs
3 86
Units
2.5%
Direct Costs
86
Units
° 8.1%
Eligible Basis
5.0%
Other Indirect Costs
S $24,081,000 Loan Amount
$24,081,000 Loan Amount
$2,904,000 Loan Amount
$56 /Sf Land $5,580,000
$493,000
$30
/Sf Land
2,980,000
$3,000
/Space
330,000
$170
/Sf GBA
14,433,000
550,000
2,553,000
365,000
150,000
1,093,000
$270 /Sf GBA $22,947,000
$1,606,000
$35,465 /Unit 3,050,000
574,000
$1,744 /Unit 150,000
2,410,000
390,000
$8,180,000
4.38% Interest
1.50 Points
1.50 Points
3 Months Operating Expenses/ Debt Service
6
1,213,000
361,000
44,000
248,000
115,000
$1,981,000
V. JTotal Development Costs 86 Units $449,900 /Unit $38,688,000
Based on the estimated fair market value of the Housing Authority and County parcels.
z Estimates assume Federal Davis Bacon and/or State prevailing wage requirements will be imposed on the Project.
3 Based on Developer estimate. The estimate should be verified by City staff.
° Based on the maximum amount allowed by TCAC.
s Includes debt on the 81°% of the Tax Credit Equity which will not be funded during construction. Assumes an 18-month construction period with a 60%
average outstanding balance and a 3-month absorption period with a 100% average outstanding balance.
6 Includes a $2,000 application fee; $410/unit monitoring fee; and 4% of the gross Tax Credit proceeds for one year.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
Filename: 112646 E Washington_5 22 19; PF; trb 80 B-33
EXHIBIT 2
TABLE 2
STABILIZED NET OPERATING INCOME
112646 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
I. Gross Income '
Manager's Unit
1
Unit
$0
/Unit/Month
$0
Base Rental Income
TC @ 30%Median/Low HOME/Moderate H&SC
Studio Units @ (400-Sf)
16
Units
$575
/Unit/Month
110,400
1-Bedroom Units @ (600-50
26
Units
$611
/Unit/Month
190,600
2-Bedroom Units @ (850-Sf)
21
Units
$723
/Unit/Month
182,200
3-Bedroom Units @ (1,100-Sf)
17
Units
$825
/Unit/Month
168,300
4-Bedroom Units @ (1,300-Sf)
5
Units
$907
/Unit/Month
54,400
Operating Subsidv
PBV Subsidy -TC Cw 30% Median/Low HOME/Moderate H&SC
Studio Units @ (400-Sf)
16
Units
$787
/Unit/Month
151,100
1-Bedroom Units @ (600-Sf)
26
Units
$859
/Unit/Month
268,000
2-Bedroom Units @ (850-5f)
1
Unit
$1,084
/Unit/Month
13,000
Laundry/Miscellaneous Income
86
Units
$6
/Unit/Month
6,200
Gross Income
$1,144,200
(Less) Vacancy & Collection Allowance
7.5%
Affordable Income
(53,400)
(Less) Vacancy & Collection Allowance 10.0%
Section 8 Subsidy
(43,200)
Effective Gross Income
$1,047,600
Operatine Expenses
General Operating Expenses
86
Units
$5,880
/Unit
$505,700
Property Taxes '
86
Units
$23
/Unit
2,000
Services
86
Units
$1,977
/Unit
170,000
PSH Monitoring Fee
2,400
Replacement Reserve
86
Units
$300
/Unit
25,800
Total Operating Expenses
86
Units
$8,208
/Unit
$705,900
Ill. IStabilized Net Operating Income
$341,700
t Based on Orange County Incomes distributed by HUD/HCD in 2019. The rents are based on those published in 2018 by the HOME Program, and in
2019 by TCAC and the CA HSC Section 50053 calculation methodology. Utility Allowances per the Developer: $48 for studio units; $56 for 1-Bdrm
units; $78 for 2-Bdrm units; $100 for 3-Bdrm units and $125 for 4-Bdrm units.
z Based on Developer estimate. Assumes that the Developer will receive the property tax exemption available to non-profit housing organizations that
own and operate apartment units restricted to households earning less than 80%AMI.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
Filename: 1126-46 E Washington_5 22 19; PF; trb Q U B-3 A
EXHIBIT 2
TABLE 3
FINANCIAL GAP CALCULATION
1126-46 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
I. Available Funding Sources
Permanent Loan '
Stabilized Net Operating Income $341,700 NO1 (See Table 2)
Income Available for Mortgage 1.20 DCR
Interest Rate/Mortgage Constant 5.50°% Interest Rate
Permanent Loan
Federal Tax Credit Equity
Gross Tax Credit Value
Syndication Rate
Net Federal Tax Credit Equity
State Tax Credit Equity
Gross Tax Credit Value
Syndication Rate
Net State Tax Credit Equity
OCHA PSH Loan 3
County Capitalized Ground Rent Payment 3
City Capitalized Ground Rent Payment 3
Deferred Developer Fee
Total Available Funding Sources
If. Financial Gap Calculation
Total Development Costs
(Less) Total Available Funding Sources
$19,372,000
$0.98 /Tax Credit Dollar
$6,457,000
$0.77 /Tax Credit Dollar
0% Total Developer Fee
$284,750 Debt Service
9.81% Mortgage Constant
$2,904,000
$18,982,000
$4,999,000
$2,281,000
$2,500,000
$3,080,000
$38,688,000
(34,746,000)
$34,746,000
Total Financial Gap 85 Units $45,800 /Unit $3,942,000
3 Assumes a 15-year amortization period.
2 Assumes a $21.5 million requested unadjusted eligible basis, which includes a $8.89 million voluntary basis reduction, a 100°%difficult-to-develop
premium, a 9.0%Tax Credit rate, and an applicable fraction of 100°%.
3 Based on Developer estimates.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
Filename: 1126-46 E Washington-5 22 19; PF; trb 80 B-35
i0:cn--im
TABLE 4
HOME COST ALLOCATION WORKSHEET - STANDARD MODEL
1126-46 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
Step 1: Determine Comparability, Select Method of Cost Allocation
Step 2: Proposed HOME Investment
Step 3: Calculate Actual Cost of HOME Units
Total Development Costs '
Ineligible Development Costs z
Unit -Specific Upgrades
Relocation Costs
Assign Relocation Exclusively to HOME Units?
Net Residential SF 65,900
$3,007,489
$38,733,621
(1,290,817)
0
0
NA
Base Project Cost
$568 /Sf Gross Residential SF
$37,442,804
Asstan Units
# of Bdrms
Unit Size
Cost Unit
1
Studio
400
$227,270
2
Studio
400
$227,270
3
Studio
400
$227,270
4
1
500
$284,088
5
1
Soo
$284,088
6
1
500
$284,088
7
1
500
$284,088
8
2
850
$482,950
9
2
850
$482,950
10
2
850
$482,950
11
2
850
$482,950
12
3
1,100
$624,994
13
3
1,100
$624,994
14
3
1,100
$624,994
15
4
1,300
$738,629
Subtotal HOME Unit Costs $6,363,572
Add: Relocation Costs Allocated Exclusively to HOME Units (if applicable) $0
Actual Cost of HOME Units $6,363,572
Step 4: Calculate Maximum Project Subsidy
Unit Size
# of Units
Max Subsidy/Unit
Maximum Subsidy
0 Bedroom
3
$147,074
$441,222
1 Bedroom
4
$168,600
674,400
2 Bedroom
4
$205,502
822,008
3 Bedroom
3
$265,229
795,687
4 Bedroom
1
$291,114
291,114
Maximum Project Subsidy
15
$3,024,431
Step 5: Maximum HOME Investment, Lesser of
Proposed Investment (Step 2) $3,007,489
Actual Cost of HOME Units (Step 3) $6,363,572
Maximum Project Subsidy (Step 4) $3,024,431
Maximum HOME Investment 15 HOME Units $3,007,489
The ineligibe costs include: off -site improvements, capitalized reserves and furnishings.
Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.
Filename: 1126-46 E Washington_5 22 19; HOME; trb 80 B-36
IT 3
Q
Li
Q
O
o
Q
CD CD(D
CD
U)
— ®
z�
o
a u.i
V1LLD
V
us
LU
`°
N
T
�
FO
EXHIBIT 3
C
�P
LL +--�
N0
v
0
0
0 Ln
coo
0
i
ti
0
m
ri
I
c
2
LO
I
N
o
o
a
N
a
0
o
N
ff
+I
w
o
rl
o
M
\
N
\
NN
N
o
0
C
er-4
N
N
�
N
co
U
LL
X
N
c
G
E
0
E
0
o
0
E
0
m
• =
C
o
o
c
c
`
m
a
m
Ol
'0
N
mi
5
:°
c
0
E
ljiLqooMoo
0
e �onFa_,
Q
LLB
Q
LLI
ii
-9 7 h
Q
N
V
i
fC
.00
z
0
0
z
0
V
z
LU
w
cz
Ln
Ln
J
z
Q
w
V1
1 f
3
a
a
�
E
�
u
E
•d
�
C
Y
�
VI
r.
O
N
01
V
(Ln0
O
W
I~O
++
O
W
W
{A
31T 3
Ii1
w _z
Q J
J IrN
W LU
N
d
acr
7
Q
s
O
LOO
Z
l�
MAn
If I .A_ :1. __
2M
t1v
UJI
J
Q
UJ
LLJ
CD
EXHIBIT 3
n\,
14 7ekil
— A . Y!:, . t.
Tolm
Q
W
Q
W
Ix
III♦
l7
l/1
W
0
J
Q
1
L.J
z
0
V
EXHIBIT 3
G
G
O V
N N
¢
N C
1- v;
C
0
os
C p
C
H N
[�m
II?
M
ID
m
EXHIBIT 3
4%
Y
EXHIBIT 3
EXHIBIT 3
0
W
Q
J
W
L
cn
w
L7
Q
J
Q
n
w
V
z
0
V
1i
Loe l m •