HomeMy WebLinkAbout20B - AA 2019-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTREQUEST FOR
COUNCIL ACTION
Is] III r-ed la.I:s]10Ji1=I =111I1.lei Ue%9:i
DECEMBER 17, 2019
TITLE:
APPROVE AN APPROPRIATION
ADJUSTMENT AND AMENDMENT TO THE
FISCAL YEAR 2019-20 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM TO ACCOUNT
FOR $13,665,000 IN NEWLY AWARDED
GRANT FUNDS
(NON -GENERAL FUND)
{STRATEGIC PLAN NO. 6, 1G}
/s/Kristine Ridge
CITY MANAGER
[a]I=11N:(+]Zd la, Eel =E•7,IWIF
APPROVED
❑ As Recommended
❑ As Amended
❑ Ordinance on 1" Reading
❑ Ordinance on 2"' Reading
❑ Implementing Resolution
❑ Set Public Hearing For_
CONTINUED TO
FILE NUMBER
RECOMMENDED ACTION
1. Approve an appropriation adjustment recognizing $13,665,000 in Active Transportation SB 1
Augmentation funds into the Traffic System Management, State Grants -Direct revenue account
and appropriating the same amount into the Active Transportation Program SB 1 Augmentation,
Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account.
2. Approve an amendment to the Fiscal Year 2019-20 Capital Improvement Program to include
additional Active Transportation Program SB 1 Augmentation grant funds in the amount of
$13,665,000 for the inclusion of the McFadden Avenue Protected Bike Lane and Bicycle
Boulevard, and Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane projects, Environmental, Design, and
Construction Engineering phases.
DISCUSSION
In May 2019, the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) notified the City of Santa
Ana that the following Active Transportation Program projects were awarded grant funding, with
no City matching funds requirements (Exhibits 1 and 2):
PROJECT
PHASE
GRANTAMOUNT
FISCAL
YEAR
Environmental
$102,000
2019/20
McFadden Avenue Protected Bike
Lane and Bicycle Boulevard Project:
Design Engineering
$1,022,000
2019/20
Harbor to Grand
Construction
$5,875,000
2020/21
Environmental
$122,000
2019/20
Standard Avenue Protected Bike
Lanes: 3rd to Warner
Design Engineering
$1,100,000
2019/20
Construction
$5,444,000
2020/21
TOTAL GRANT FUNDING:1 $13,665,000
20B-1
Appropriation Adjustment & Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019-20 CIP
December 17, 2019
Page 2
The McFadden Avenue Protected Bike Lane and Bicycle Boulevard Project will install Class 4
Protected Bike Lanes from Harbor Boulevard to Bristol Street, from Halladay Street to Grand
Avenue, and a Class 3 Bike Boulevard from Bristol to Halladay Street. This project will include
signing, striping, median, bike detection, bulb -outs, and traffic signal modifications to provide a safe
and low -stress mobility option, with expected outcomes to improve air quality, reduce greenhouse
gas emissions, and promote healthy lifestyles.
The Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lane Project from 3'd Street to Warner Avenue will install
Class 4 Protected Bike Lanes, Class 2 Buffered Bike Lanes, a Class 3 Bike Boulevard from 3'd
Street to Warner Avenue, and a Protected Intersection at McFadden and Standard Avenue. Both
projects are designed to increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety and mobility, as well as provide
connections to future bike facilities.
Protected Bike Lanes categorized as Class 4 bikeways are also known as cycle tracks, and provide
space that is exclusively for bicyclists and separated from motor vehicle travel lanes, parking lanes,
and sidewalks. Bike Boulevards categorized as Class 3 bikeways are bike routes on residential
streets that prioritize through trips for bicyclists. Traffic calming is included as needed to discourage
drivers from using the boulevard as a through route.
Recommended Action No. 1 will recognize the grant award of $13,665,000, appropriating
$2,346,000 for expenditure in Fiscal Year 2019-20 and $11,319,000 in Fiscal Year 2020-21.
Recommended Action No. 2 will amend the FY 2019-20 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to include
the $13,655,000 grant fund allocation, making this revenue available for the continued progress of
City's Active Transportation Plan (ATP) enhancements for multi -modal transportation safety
(Exhibit 3).
STRATEGIC PLAN ALIGNMENT
Approval of this item supports the City's efforts to meet Goal #6 - Community Facilities &
Infrastructure, Objective #1 (Establish and Maintain a Community Investment Plan for All City
Assets), Strategy G (Develop and Implement the City's Capital Improvement Program in
Coordination with the Community Investment and Deferred Maintenance Plans).
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
There is no environmental impact associated with this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
Approval of the requested Appropriation Adjustment will recognize $13,665,000 in State -funded
ATP funds into the Traffic System Management, State Grants -Direct revenue account (No.
14817002-52025) and appropriate the same amount into the Active Transportation Program
Augmentation, Improvements Other Than Building expenditure account (No. 14817614-66220).
Appropriated funds will be expended as follows:
20B-2
Appropriation Adjustment & Amendment to Fiscal Year 2019-20 CIP
December 17, 2019
Page 3
Fiscal Year
Accounting
Fund Description
Accounting Unit,
Amount
Unit -Account #
Account Description
McFadden Avenue Protected Bike Lane and Bicycle Boulevard Project
Traffic System
Active Transportation
FY 2019-20
14817614-66220
Management
Program Augmentation,
$1,124,000
Dec. -June
Grant
Improvements Other
Than Building
Traffic System
Active Transportation
FY 2020-21
14817614-66220
Management
Program Augmentation,
$5,875,000
July - June
Grant
Improvements Other
Than Building
Standard Avenue Protected Bike Lanes
Traffic System
Active Transportation
FY 2019-20
14817614-66220
Management
Program Augmentation,
$1,222,000
Dec. -June
Grant
Improvements Other
Than Building
Traffic System
Active Transportation
FY 2020-21
14817614-66220
Management
Program Augmentation,
$5,444,000
July - June
Grant
Improvements Other
Than Building
Total:
$13,665,000
Fuad S. Sweiss, PE, PLS Kathryn Downs, CPA
Executive Director Executive Director
Public Works Agency Finance and Management Services Agency
FSS/NS/EWG/JG/KN/HG
Exhibits: 1. 2019 SCAG Regional Active Transportation Program Award Letter, May 21, 2019
2. California Transportation Commission Board Action, May 15-16, 2019
3. Amended FY 2019-20 CIP Worksheets
r1-
EXHIBIT 1
ll
Is��,�
'I.`
SCAGM
INNOVATING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
goo Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
T: (213) 236-1800
www.scag.ca.gov
REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICERS
President
Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake
First Vice President
Bandon Lane, Murrieta
Second Vice President
Rex Richardson, Long Beach
Immediate Past President
Alan D. Wapner, San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority
COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Executive/Administration
Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake
Community, Economic &
Human Development
Peggy Huang, Transportation
Corridor Agencies
Energy & Environment
Linda Parks, Ventura County
Transportation
Cheryl Viegas-Walker, El Centro
May 21, 2019
Zed Kekula
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92702
RE: 2019 SCAG Regional Active Transportation Program
Dear Zed Kekula:
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), I am pleased to inform you that the McFadden Avenue
Protected Bike Lane and Bicycle Boulevard Project was formally
adopted under the 2019 SCAG Regional Active Transportation Program
by SCAG's Regional Council on April 4, 2019, and that the California
Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted the 2019 SCAG Regional ATP
on May 15, 2019. Please find the board agenda on the website of the
California Transportation Commission (CTC).
SCAG looks forward to partnering with the City of Santa Ana and
appreciates your interest in the program. This project has been
awarded Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding which includes a
few more steps prior to launching the project. The next steps are:
• To initiate the project, your agency will need to receive funding
allocation from the CTC. Project sponsors must submit their allocation
request to Caltrans within the fiscal year in which the project is
programmed and ensure that they can meet CTC guidelines for
approving the allocation on time.
• Prior to allocation, your project must be programmed in the
Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Please contact
your County Transportation Commission staff to coordinate this process
at your earliest opportunity to keep the project on schedule.
• Upon allocation, you will have six (6) months to award the
contract. Once the contract is awarded, you will have 36 months to
complete the phase of the project that was allocated. Semi-annual
reports and final delivery reports shall be submitted to Caltrans, SCAG
and County Transportation Commission staff, per the Project Progress
Report Instructions.
If you have any questions, Caltrans Local Assistance Office and the
County Transportation Commission are the main points of contact for
Page I 1 of 2
allocation requirements. Contact information for Caltrans and the County Transportation
Commission staff is attached. SCAG staff is also available to address any questions you may
have. Please do not hesitate to contact, Rye Baerg, Acting Manager, Active Transportation and
Special Programs, at (213) 236-1866 or by email at baerg@scag.ca.gov.
Thank you again for your interest in partnering with SCAG to plan for a better future for your
community and the entire SCAG region.
Sincerely,
Sarah Jepson
Acting Planning Director, SCAG
20 B-5 Page 12 of 2
•I Mj M.
SCAGM
INNOVATING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
goo Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90017
T: (213) 236-1800
www.scag.ca.gov
REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICERS
President
Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake
First Vice President
Bandon Lane, Murrieta
Second Vice President
Rex Richardson, Long Beach
Immediate Past President
Alan D. Wapner, San Bernardino
County Transportation Authority
COMMITTEE CHAIRS
Executive/Administration
Bill Jahn, Big Bear Lake
Community, Economic &
Human Development
Peggy Huang, Transportation
Corridor Agencies
Energy & Environment
Linda Parks, Ventura County
Transportation
Cheryl Viegas-Walker, El Centro
May 21, 2019
Zed Kekula
City of Santa Ana
20 Civic Center Plaza, M-43
Santa Ana, CA 92702
RE: 2019 SCAG Regional Active Transportation Program
Dear Zed Kekula:
On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments
(SCAG), I am pleased to inform you that the Standard Avenue
Protected Bike Lane and Protected Intersection Project was formally
adopted under the 2019 SCAG Regional Active Transportation Program
by SCAG's Regional Council on April 4, 2019, and that the California
Transportation Commission (CTC) adopted the 2019 SCAG Regional ATP
on May 15, 2019. Please find the board agenda on the website of the
California Transportation Commission (CTC).
SCAG looks forward to partnering with the City of Santa Ana and
appreciates your interest in the program. This project has been
awarded Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding which includes a
few more steps prior to launching the project. The next steps are:
• To initiate the project, your agency will need to receive funding
allocation from the CTC. Project sponsors must submit their allocation
request to Caltrans within the fiscal year in which the project is
programmed and ensure that they can meet CTC guidelines for
approving the allocation on time.
• Prior to allocation, your project must be programmed in the
Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP). Please contact
your County Transportation Commission staff to coordinate this process
at your earliest opportunity to keep the project on schedule.
• Upon allocation, you will have six (6) months to award the
contract. Once the contract is awarded, you will have 36 months to
complete the phase of the project that was allocated. Semi-annual
reports and final delivery reports shall be submitted to Caltrans, SCAG
and County Transportation Commission staff, per the Project Progress
Report Instructions.
If you have any questions, Caltrans Local Assistance Office and the
County Transportation Commission are the main points of contact for
rI-
Page I 1 of 2
allocation requirements. Contact information for Caltrans and the County Transportation
Commission staff is attached. SCAG staff is also available to address any questions you may
have. Please do not hesitate to contact, Rye Baerg, Acting Manager, Active Transportation and
Special Programs, at (213) 236-1866 or by email at baerg@scag.ca.gov.
Thank you again for your interest in partnering with SCAG to plan for a better future for your
community and the entire SCAG region.
Sincerely,
Sarah Jepson
Acting Planning Director, SCAG
20 B-7 Page 12 of 2
EXHIBIT 2
Tab 59
Memorandum
To: CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
From: SUSAN BRANSEN, Executive Director
Reference Number: 4.21, Action
Prepared By: Anja Aulenbacher,
Assistant Deputy Director
Published Date: May 3, 2019
CTC Meeting: May 15-16, 2019
Subject: Adoption of the 2019 Active Transportation Program Metropolitan Planning
Organization Component —10 of 10 Large Metropolitan Planning Organizations,
Resolution G-19-12
Issue:
Should the California Transportation Commission (Commission) adopt the 2019 Active
Transportation Program Metropolitan Planning Organization component— 10 of 10 large
Metropolitan Planning Organizations?
Recommendation:
Commission staff recommends that the Commission:
1. Adopt the 2019 Active Transportation Program Metropolitan Planning Organization
Component for Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG), Kern Council of
Governments (KCOG), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Sacramento
Council of Governments (SACOG), San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG), San Joaquin Council of Governments (SJCOG), Southern California
Association of Governments (SCAG), Stanislaus Council of Governments
(StanCOG), Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization (TMPO) and Tulare County
Association of Governments (TCAG) in accordance with the attached resolution and
programming spreadsheet. Commission staff recommendations correspond with the
Metropolitan Planning Organization recommendations.
2. Authorize Commission staff to make any specific technical changes, corrections or
exceptions to Commission staff recommendations, with a report of any substantive
changes back to the Commission for approval at a subsequent Commission meeting.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
20B-8
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 2 of 8
Background:
In summary, Commission staff recommends that the 2019 Active Transportation
Program Metropolitan Planning Organization Component funds totaling $174,885,000
for all ten large Metropolitan Planning Organizations be programmed to 59 projects
valued at $331,474,000.
• $165,147,000 (94 percent of $174,885,000) to 53 projects benefiting disadvantaged
communities.
• $95,599,000 (55 percent of $174,885,000) to 40 Safe Routes to School projects.
• 31 of the 59 projects are designated for state only funding.
The Commission's adoption of the 2019 Active Transportation Program
Metropolitan Planning Organization Component is not authorization to begin work
on a project. Contracts may not be awarded nor may work begin until an
allocation is approved by the Commission for a project in the adopted program.
On September 26, 2013, the Governor signed legislation creating the Active
Transportation Program (Senate Bill 99, Chapter 359 and Assembly Bill 101, Chapter
354). Senate Bill 1, signed by the Governor on April 28, 2017, directs an additional $100
million annually from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account to the Active
Transportation Program beginning in Fiscal Year 2017-18. Per legislation, a minimum of
25 percent of all 2019 Active Transportation Program funds must benefit disadvantaged
communities.
The Commission adopted the Fund Estimate and the program guidelines for the 2019
Active Transportation Program on May 16, 2018. The 2019 Active Transportation
Program includes four years of programming, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, and 2022-23,
with $445,560,000 in funding capacity for the following program components:
• Statewide (50 percent or $218,780,000)
• Small Urban & Rural (10 percent or $43,756,000)
• Metropolitan Planning Organizations (40 percent or $175,024,000)
• California Conservation Corps ($8,000,000)
The Commission staff recommendations are based on consistency with the Active
Transportation Program Metropolitan Planning Organization competitive program
project selection criteria set forth in the 2019 Active Transportation Program Guidelines
(Section 19, Metropolitan Planning Organization Competitive Project Selection) and the
following:
• Funding levels identified in the 2019 Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate.
• Eligibility for the program.
• Metropolitan Planning Organization multidisciplinary advisory group scores.
• Statutory requirements.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2C,AyFaRNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 3 of 8
The Commission adopted the 2019 Active Transportation Program Statewide and Small
Urban and Rural Components on January 30, 2019. Projects not programmed in the
Statewide competitive component were distributed to the ten large Metropolitan
Planning Organizations based on location.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Evaluation Process
All applications considered by the ten large Metropolitan Planning Organizations were
submitted through the statewide competitive program. Per the 2019 Active
Transportation Program Guidelines, a Metropolitan Planning Organization may delegate
its project selection to the Commission using the statewide competition project selection
criteria; or, with Commission approval, a Metropolitan Planning Organization may use
different project selection criteria, weighting, minimum project size, and match
requirement.
The Commission approved amendments to the 2019 Active Transportation Program
guidelines allowing different project selection criteria for the following Metropolitan
Planning Organizations: Fresno Council of Governments, Metropolitan Transportation
Commission, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, San Diego Association of
Governments, Southern California Association of Governments, Tulare County
Association of Governments, and Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization.
The Kern Council of Governments, Stanislaus Council of Governments, and the San
Joaquin Council of Governments did not propose regional 2019 Active Transportation
Program Guidelines.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Program of Projects - Examples
The Metropolitan Planning Organization program recommendations include active
transportation projects that will provide significant benefits. Examples include:
Fresno Council of Governments
City of Fresno — Connecting the Winchell Neighborhood, Butler/8th and Orange/Lowe
Signals Project will install two traffic signals, pedestrian countdown equipment,
sidewalks, curb ramps, and gutters. The City has been working to improve active
transportation facilities in this neighborhood for the last several years as part of the
"Restore Fresno" effort which aims to improve health, safety and infrastructure
through close collaboration with the community. This project will result in improved
safety for non -motorized users so that they can travel by foot, bike, or mobility device
comfortably and reliably, and more parents will allow their children to walk to school.
Fresno County — West Park Pedestrian Pathway Project will develop a four -foot wide
asphalt concrete walking and biking path between the community of West Park and
the West Park Elementary School. The path will provide a safe active transportation
route; benefits will include decreased risk of traffic -related injuries, increased active
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff F�tNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 4 of 8
transportation usage, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions through reduced
reliance on motorized vehicles, and increased sense of place for the community.
Kern Council of Governments
• City of Bakersfield — Friant-Kern Canal Multi -Use Path Project will construct a six -mile
Class I multi -use path along the Friant-Kern Canal within a 25-foot easement. The
Project creates a regional active transportation corridor along the Friant-Kern Canal
that connects to an existing east/west multi -use path (32 miles) along the Kern River
Parkway. The project substantially transforms the active transportation network in
Bakersfield and adds regional connectivity throughout Kern County.
Metropolitan Transportation Commission
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency —6th Street Pedestrian Safety
Project will substantially improve safety and livability in San Francisco's most dense
and diverse neighborhood. The project includes sidewalk widening, upgraded traffic
signals, improved signal timing, reduced crossing distances, new pedestrian -scale
lighting, and landscaping/street furniture upgrades. This project will transform 6th
Street and reduce the high numbers of pedestrian collisions and injuries.
City of San Jose — Willow -Keyes Complete Street Improvements Project will enhance
safety for people walking and biking by constructing complete street elements such
as a Class IV protected bike lane, new sidewalk, and curb extensions. The
improvements will provide continuous, safe, and comfortable facilities for people of all
ages and abilities. Pedestrians and bicyclists will benefit from a safe, calm,
comfortable roadway, encouraging more walking and biking.
Sacramento Council of Governments
City of Sacramento — Broadway Complete Streets Project - Phase 2 will complete the
two -mile -long corridor mobility improvements which aim to rebalance space for all
modes on the Broadway corridor by reducing the number of travel lanes, installing
bike facilities, and constructing pedestrian improvements. This project closes a critical
gap in the bikeway network and improves pedestrian facilities, which will make active
transportation and transit a more attractive and viable option.
Yuba County — Cedar Lane Elementary Safe Routes to Schools Project will provide
safe bicycle and pedestrian access to Cedar Lane Elementary School, transit
facilities, and downtown Linda. The project promotes active transportation, decreases
vehicle speeds, decreases the number of motorized vehicle trips, increases bicycle
and pedestrian trips, improves air quality, and improves public health. The project
will also provide pedestrian and bicycle education for parents and students from
educators at WALKSacramento.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff FffNIATRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 5 of 8
San Diego Association of Governments
• San Diego Association of Governments — University Bikeway Project consists of a
road diet, removal of free -right slip lanes, separated bike lanes, buffered bike lanes,
protected intersections, signal -protected crossings, new/enhanced pedestrian
crossings, curb extensions, speed cushions, bikeway markings, and other high -
visibility treatments. Expected benefits include a dramatic drop in the level of traffic
stress, reduced speeds, increased protection from vehicle traffic, increased
crossings, shorter crossings, greater visibility, and traffic calming.
• City of Escondido — Escondido Creek Trail Transit Center Bicycle Path Improvements
Project will increase active transportation connectivity by improving approximately 1.6
miles of underutilized Class I bike trail and close several bike/pedestrian gaps along
the trail. This project will add lighting, pedestrian signals, crosswalks, ramps, and
signage to two intersections.
San Joaquin Council of Governments
• San Joaquin County — Oro Avenue and Section Avenue Sidewalk Improvements
Project will install sidewalks, curbs, and gutters on approximately 1,900 feet of Oro
Avenue, as well as approximately 1,100 feet of Section Avenue. Seven new curb
ramps will be installed, allowing easier access for those walking or using wheeled
apparatus. The addition of sidewalks, curb ramps, and a beacon in this area
addresses a need to connect students to nearby schools and community members to
transit stops, stores, markets and childcare facilities.
• City of Stockton — Safe Routes to School Sidewalk Gap Closure Project will install
curbs, gutters, and sidewalks to close sidewalk gaps along routes to schools
surrounding five school sites. Minimum five feet wide sidewalks, bulb -outs, pedestrian
lighting, school signage, compliant ADA curb ramps, and where necessary, a
pedestrian gate and high visibility crosswalks will be installed to provide protection
and increase safety for students walking to school. The anticipated benefit of this
project is an increase in safety for students which will lead to an increase in the
number of students who use these new or upgraded facilities. Additionally, the City
anticipates an improvement to public health and reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions.
Southern California Association of Governments
• City of Ontario — Pedestrian Improvements around Haynes, Vista Grande, and Oaks
Schools Project will complete a pedestrian network by installing missing sidewalks,
replacement ADA curb ramps, truncated domes on existing ADA curb ramps, street
lights, enhanced crosswalks, and shade trees. In addition, an education and
encouragement non -infrastructure component is included to encourage children to
walk to school. Upon completion of the project, residents will have improved
pedestrian access to local schools, parks, commercial centers, and transit stops, and
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff FfffNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 6 of 8
programs to encourage behavior change resulting in more residents walking to local
destinations and walking for the positive health benefits.
• Los Angeles Bureau of Street Services (Engineering Division) — Broadway -
Manchester Active Transportation Equity Project will construct a separated, Class IV
cycle track, continental crosswalks, a center median pedestrian refuge island,
sidewalk improvements, curb extensions, upgraded access ramps, pedestrian
signals, and more. Each of these measures will work to slow speeding vehicles on
the corridor and increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety. The project benefits include
enhanced safety and mobility for active transportation users, a rise in trips taken by
pedestrians and bicyclists and an increase in public health outcomes for residents
due to an increase in active transportation activities.
Stanislaus Council of Governments
• Stanislaus County— Bret Harte Elementary Safe Crossing and Active Transportation
Connectivity Project will install new sidewalks, Class III bicycle routes, and bike
racks. Improvements created by this project to help support student safety to and
from Bret Harte Elementary School and Evelyn Hanshaw Middle School include high
visibility crosswalks adjacent to the school site, and various safety improvements and
enhancements which create an overall improved bicycle and pedestrian network
throughout the neighborhood. This project will result in a safer environment for
students and community members, increase access to various local destinations,
improve safety, and provide greater regional access.
Tahoe Metropolitan Planning Organization
• City of South Lake Tahoe — Lake Tahoe Boulevard Class I Bicycle Trail Project will
construct a lit Class I bike trail that will parallel Lake Tahoe Boulevard, allowing
commuters and recreational users to travel between the city and county areas without
ever leaving the safety of a Class I bike path. The benefits of this project include
closing a trail gap, completing a safe route to the South Tahoe High School, and
providing a connection to a transit center and various shopping areas.
Tulare County Association of Governments
• City of Woodlake — North Valencia Boulevard Safe Routes to School Extension, Gap
Improvements Project will extend previously built improvements and close a gap on
North Valencia. The improvements include curbs, gutters, sidewalks, ADA compliant
ramps, street lighting, crosswalks, and Class II bike lanes along North Valencia
Boulevard. This project benefits students and the community at large by providing
much needed infrastructure in a disadvantaged community, creating a safer active
transportation corridor, and increasing walking and biking. Additional benefits will be
healthier citizens, cleaner management of storm water, and reduction in emissions.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff FfJNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Programming Recommendations
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 7 of 8
The following table summarizes the proposed programming recommendations for the
ten Metropolitan Planning Organizations (dollar amounts are in $1,000's):
Metropolitan
#
FY
FY
FY
FY
Fund
Under
Planning
Proj.
2019-20
2020-21
2021-22
2022-23
Total
Est.
(Over)
Organization
Target
Target
FCOG
9
$392
$1,584
$450
$2,346
$4,772
$4,772
$0
KCOG
1
$0
$4,306
$0
$0
$4,306
$4,306
$0
MTC
6
$12,987
$10,757
$0
$12,926
$36,670
$36,670
$0
SACOG
7
$3,427
$3,335
$4,902
$0
$11,664
$11,666
$2
SANDAG
4
$1,381
$747
$8,561
$5,185
$15,874
$15,874
$0
SCAG
25
$20,331
$20,896
$22,198
$29,147
$92,572
$92,572
$0
SJCOG
2
$565
$745
$1,184
$1,020
$3,514
$3,514
$0
StanCOG
2
$99
$0
$0
$2,402
$2,501
$2,638
$137
TCAG
2
$980
$263
$0
$1,025
$2,268
$2,268
$0
TMPO
1
$0
$744
$0
$0
$744
$744
$0
Totals:
59
$40,162
$43,377
$37,295
$54,051
$174,885
$175,024
$139
Cumulative
Fund
Estimate
Capacity
$38,400
$38,400
$49,112
$49,112
$175,024
Cumulative
Under (Over)
Fund
Estimate
$ 1,762
$ 4,977
$11,817
$ 4,939
$139
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff FfINIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Page 8 of 8
The following table shows the amount of funding per Metropolitan Planning
Organization that benefits disadvantaged communities (dollar amounts are in $1,000's):
Metropolitan Planning
Organization
# DAC
Projects
Total DAC
Projects
Programmed
Fund
Est.
Target
Under
(Over)
Target
FCOG
9
$4,772
$1,194
$(3,578)
KCOG
1
$4,306
$1,076
$(3,230)
MTC
6
$36,670
$9,166
$(27,504)
SACOG
3
$8,270
$2,916
$(5,354)
SANDAG
4
$15,874
$3,970
$(11,904)
SCAG
23
$86,228
$23,144
$(63,084)
SJCOG
2
$3,514
$880
$(2,634)
StanCOG
2
$2,501
$660
$(1,841)
TCAG
2
$2,268
$566
$(1,702)
TMPO
1
$744
$186
$(558)
Totals:
53
$165,147
$43,758
$(121,389)
Attachments:
• Attachment A: Resolution G-19-12
• Attachment B: 2019 Active Transportation Program — Metropolitan Planning
Organization Component Project Recommendations
• Attachment C: 2019 Active Transportation Program — Metropolitan Planning
Organization Submittals
STATE OF CALIFORNIA 26 ff FfgNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Attachment A
CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
Adoption of the 2019 Active Transportation Program
Metropolitan Planning Organization Component
RESOLUTION G-19-12
1.1 WHEREAS, Streets and Highways Code Section 2384 requires the California
Transportation Commission (Commission) to adopt a program of projects to
receive allocations under the Active Transportation Program; and
1.2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2384, the 2019 Active Transportation Program
is a four-year program covering program years 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22 and
2022-23; and
1.3 WHEREAS, the Commission adopted 2019 Active Transportation Program
Guidelines at the May 2018 meeting; and
1.4 WHEREAS, the 2019 Active Transportation Program Fund Estimate provided
$445,560,000 in Active Transportation Program programming capacity to be
apportioned to the Statewide (50 percent), Small Urban and Rural (10 percent)
and Metropolitan Planning Organization (40 percent) Components and the
California Conservation Corps ($8,000,000); and
1.5 WHEREAS, the Commission adopted the 2019 Active Transportation Program
Statewide and Small Urban and Rural Components at the January 2019 meeting;
and
1.6 WHEREAS, the total amount programmed may not exceed the amount specified
in the adopted Fund Estimate; and
1.7 WHEREAS, the Commission staff recommendations conform to the Fund
Estimate and other requirements of statute for the Active Transportation
Program; and
1.8 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Planning Organizations have designated projects to
receive state only funding.
2.1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Commission hereby adopts the
2019 Active Transportation Program, Metropolitan Planning Organization
Component (10 of 10 Metropolitan Planning Organizations), to include the
program described in the Commission staff recommendations, including the
attachments to this resolution; and
2.2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that having a project included in the adopted
2019 Active Transportation Program, Metropolitan Planning Organization
Component, is not authorization to begin work on that project. Contracts may not
be awarded, nor work begin until an allocation is approved by the Commission
for a project in the adopted program; and
2.3 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Metropolitan Planning Organizations
have designated projects to receive state only funding and if a Metropolitan
Planning Organization wishes to change the designation to another project, they
must notify the Commission and the California Department of Transportation's
20B-16
Resolution G-19-12
2.4
Reference No.: 4.21
May 15-16, 2019
Attachment A
Page 2 of 2
(Department) Active Transportation Program office of a previously designated
state only funded project that will now receive federal funding. In addition, all
amendments to the state only funding designation must be made prior to an
allocation request for that project; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that if available funding is less than assumed in
the Fund Estimate, the Commission may be forced to delay or restrict allocations
using interim allocation plans, or, if available funding proves to be greater than
assumed, it may be possible to allocate funding to some projects earlier than the
year programmed; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Commission staff, in consultation with the
Department and regional agencies, is authorized to make further technical
changes in cost, schedules, and descriptions for projects in the 2019 Active
Transportation Program — Metropolitan Planning Organization Component,
consistent with the Fund Estimate, in order to reflect the most current
information, or to clarify the Commission's programming commitments, with
report of any substantive changes back to the Commission for approval at a
subsequent meeting.
20B-17
c
wm
N
F
K
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
N
N
2
2
O
N
X
X
X
X
2
O
U
n
O
V
�
n
.
.
•
�
n
n
O
C
N
a
m
QK
rvn
w
w
rvn
w
w
e9
ea
W
a3
w
w
e»
w
y
e9
H6e9
M
W
e9
M
W
e9
M
W
»
w
w
e»
w
es
e9
E Y
-
_
lo
F
�S
mtt
Eo
-o
o
o_
vo
a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O 20�
1
O
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
c
wm
LLa
`
o
0
N
F
K
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Q
X
X
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
2
2
O
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
O
U
O
V
O
C
y
N
a
w
a
QK
H6rvn
w
W
e9
w
w
rvn
w
W
rvn
w
w
»
N
w
e»
N
�
N
C.1
u=
ma
mr
LL9
Fm
cia
3
¢'m
0�a
w"ua`
x
m¢z
o`er
im
is""ci
9
3
9
9
-
a
E
E
E
E
1.
—
2
3
9
u
9
0�
oA
o
u
4
ci
N >
o0
a
o
a
0
0
0
0
0
a
a
z
o
0
0
0
V
V
V
.20131$
¢
c
wm
m
LLa
N
F
K
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
2
2
2
2
2
O
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
2
O
U
O
V
�
O
C
y
N
a
-
m
QK
rvn
e9
w
»
w
N
»
m
w
a>
e9
w
e9
w
us
»
H6rvn
M
en
»
w
W
a3
M
w
a3
M
w
e9
w
es
»
20
97
w w
o
o`
o`
o
rc
a
a
rc
a
u,m
mm"
uim
u,m
u, m"
a
>Nr
dy
dm2`
m
m
a
V
�
,�
G6
C7
R a
R m
R a
K
F
K
R
Q
_
m•F
m0�
a
6
Q
Q
6
Q
Q
6
2U13
6
Q
Q
6
Q
Q
6
c
wm
LLa
N
F
K
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Q
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
F
2
2
O
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Z
2
O
U
�
m
•
•
.
N
2
O
V
r
m
f
m
s
~
m
s
m
f
m
O
C
w
N
a
6,
m
w
rvn
w
rvn
3
Q fL
j
s
N
Q
H6
y£e
6
�
_
U
�
_
_
U
U
gG
O
U
U'
U'
U
U'
U
V'
U
U'
U
/�
� 2
O 0
am20041
[al
F
F
EXHIBIT 3
)
\
\
2
.>
\\
§}
°»
§[)
■m
■2«
B��B��
�
§
B
/
LA
|
2
0
24uu
U
2
�
§� 2
E
o > co
.(
LL c
■
\
\
7
[14
A
\
)
�\\
■§!§/«
�
§
B
�e
\ Z
. !
.(.
}
G+;
•�«
Lei
,m4:.
WEW s K
\
/
ƒ
)
ƒ
■
\
\
)
20B-24